Jump to content

A 1.5-Solar-Mass Star in a Tight Orbit Around the 4.3-Million

Avi Loeb Medium
 Share

Recommended Posts

Avi Loeb Medium Newbie

Avi Loeb Medium

Posted
Posted

A 1.5-Solar-Mass Star in a Tight Orbit Around the 4.3-Million Solar-Mass Black Hole at the Milky-Way Center

1*TH7R6Yaq_yttwTqUfJv2Gg.png
Time series of the orbits of various stars around the supermassive black hole, SgrA*, at the Milky-Way center, obtained from data by GRAVITY/VLT between 2021 to 2025. The new star S301 arrives within 140 Schwarzschild radii of the black hole where its peak velocity is 8.3% of the speed of light, 25,000 kilometers per second. (Image credit: Abd El Dayem et al. 2026)

The fastest moving star, labeled S301, was discovered recently by Stefan Gillessen’s team at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany (as first reported here, with the full paper accessible here). The star was discovered by near-infrared interferometry on 8-meter telescopes, using the GRAVITY instrument in operation at the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO’s) Very Large Telescope (VLT). Last night, I sat next to Stefan at the reception dinner of the annual conference of Harvard’s Black Hole Initiative, for which I served as the founding director a decade ago.

This 1.5-solar-mass star moves on a highly elliptical orbit with a period of 8.7 years and eccentricity of 0.98 around the supermassive black hole at the Milky-Way center, called Sagittarius A*. This black hole has a long history of swallowing 4.3 million solar masses of gas and stars from its environment. The peak velocity of S301 is 25,000 kilometers per second or 8.3% of the speed of light, as it comes down to a distance of 140 times the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole — which defines the scale of the black hole mouth from where even light cannot escape. If the star were to pass ten times closer to the black hole, it would have been ripped apart by tidal gravity into a stream of gas that shines brightly as it feeds the mouth of this spacetime beast.

The orbit of S301 can be used to test expectations from Albert Einstein’s formulation of gravity as the curvature of spacetime. Einstein’s equations predict that S301’s orbit will precess in response to the spin of the black hole, offering a precise new way to measure how fast Sagittarius A* is rotating within the coming decade.

How did this star get so close to the black hole?

A natural mechanism, proposed by Jack Hills in a 1988 paper published here, is the tidal break-up of a pair of stars by the black hole. About half of solar-mass stars form in binaries. When a binary star system gets close enough to the black hole, the tidal gravity becomes strong than the gravitational binding of the two stars and breaks the binary apart, sending one star out at a speed of up to thousands of kilometers per second and launching the second star into a tighter orbit around the black hole. Indeed, a population of hypervelocity stars had been discovered on their way out in the Milky-Way halo by Warren Brown and collaborators from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (as reported here).

In a 2006 paper published here, I proposed with the student, Idan Ginsburg, that the former companions of the observed hypervelocity stars in the Milky-Way halo might have produced the observed population of close-in S-stars on highly eccentric orbits around Sagittarius A*. The Galactic center star S301 is likely one of them, formed via the Hills mechanism out of an initial binary star system with an orbital period of 1–2 weeks over the past 100 million years.

In a follow-up paper published here, I showed with Idan that planets could survive the break-up of binary star systems by Sagittarius A*. As a result, Galactic travel agencies could sell tickets for thrilling journeys on habitable planets around hypervelocity stars. I wonder whether adventurous Galactic passengers would prefer to travel with a hypervelocity star on its way out of the Milky-Way galaxy at a speed of up to 1% of the speed of light or travel with a star like S301 as it reaches 8.3% of the speed of light and gets within a distance of 140 Schwarzschild radii from the largest black hole in our Galaxy. I would personally favor the latter, since the extreme spacetime structure of a supermassive black hole is far more exhilarating than the rarefied environment of intergalactic space. The trip close to the black hole also offers health benefits, since aging slows down by a third of a percent at closest approach of S301 to Sagittarius A*. This corresponds to a gain of 5 minutes to the passenger’s lifespan every day relative to distant relatives.

The black hole tour with S301 offers a view of the black hole’s mouth from a distance where it occupies roughly the same angle as the Moon or the Sun on our sky. The gas swirling into the event horizon of Sagittarius A* glows bright but at the center of this glow, there is a silhouette — a shadow cast by the absorption of light emanating behind the black hole. Over the decade between 2006 and 2016, I wrote 30 papers in collaboration with my postdoc, Avery Broderick, forecasting the expected portrait of a black hole (as detailed here and summarized for the general public here). By now, Sagittarius A* was imaged by the Event Horizon Telescope (here), whose headquarters was established at Harvard’s Black Hole Initiative during my directorship.

On a tour with S301, it would be fascinating to observed the silhouette image of Sagittarius A* from a minimum distance that is 140 million times closer than the Earth is from the black hole. I would have loved to serve as the tour guide on such a journey. Here’s hoping that Galactic travel agents would pay attention to this essay.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

Professional website:

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/

Social media:

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb

https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Topics

    • DeepSkyExplorer
      Coulthart Expresses Concern Over U.S. Weapons In Orbit Discussion
      By DeepSkyExplorer
      In a recent talk with NewsNation, investigative journalist Ross Coulthart shared some alarming thoughts regarding the Pentagon's decision to launch defensive weapons into orbit. He noted that this move has drawn sharp criticism from foreign adversaries, raising questions about the implications for U.S. security and international relations. This discussion took place against the backdrop of ongoing developments surrounding government files on UAPs, which Coulthart has been closely following.
      What's particularly striking about Coulthart's comments is his assertion that these actions should make us 'really worried.' It seems he's pointing to a growing concern not just about the weapons themselves but about what this means for transparency and accountability in how the U.S. handles its space initiatives. The discussion hints at a potential shift in public perception regarding military operations in space, especially as more UAP-related documents are being released.
      Coulthart emphasizes the critical nature of this topic by linking it to the broader narrative of UAP disclosures. The U.S. government has been gradually opening up about its investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena, but the introduction of weapons into space complicates this narrative. It suggests a dual focus on both defense and secrecy, which could fuel further skepticism and concern among the public and international community.
      It's also worth noting that while the conversation centers around the military aspect of space, it ties back to longstanding questions about the government's stance on UAPs. Official records have been trickling out, but the relationship between military readiness and transparency remains a contentious issue. As Coulthart discusses this, it raises the question of how much the public should know about military capabilities and their implications for national and global security.
      One thing that remains unclear from this conversation is the extent of the U.S. military's capabilities in space and how they align with international law and agreements. There's a gap in details about the specific types of weapons being deployed and how they might be used against potential airborne threats, including UAPs. This lack of clarity could lead to misunderstandings or even escalate tensions with other nations.
      Given Coulthart's insights and the ongoing discussions around UAPs, it seems we need to critically assess how military developments in space could impact the broader narrative of transparency and accountability concerning unidentified aerial phenomena. As more information comes to light, the conversation around this issue will likely evolve, but for now, it feels like we’re at a crossroads in understanding the implications of such military actions.
      As we consider the broader implications, how do you think the deployment of defensive weapons in orbit could affect the future of UAP disclosure and military transparency?
    • SpaceObserver
      Artemis I's Lunar Orbit Surprises: What Did We Miss?
      By SpaceObserver
      I was reflecting on the Artemis I mission and its lunar orbit phase. It's wild to think we had a spacecraft making such close passes around the Moon again after all these years. The data it's sent back feels like a treasure trove for anyone interested in lunar science.
      One detail I found particularly interesting is how Artemis I managed to provide insights into the Moon's polar regions. It seems like there’s finally a push to explore areas that have been neglected in past missions. Do you think this could lead to more targeted exploration in the future, especially with the potential for water ice?
      Also, the trajectory adjustments required for the mission were fascinating. I read that they had to do some significant maneuvers to get into that distant retrograde orbit. It’s kind of mind-boggling how precise they have to be with that kind of navigation. Has anyone else looked into the technical aspects of these maneuvers?
      I wonder if the Artemis missions will set a new standard for what we expect from lunar exploration. With the upcoming lander missions planned, do you think we'll see any surprises similar to what Artemis I delivered? The potential for new discoveries about the Moon's history is so exciting.
      Let's not forget the implications of all this for future Mars missions as well. NASA seems keen to use the Artemis program as a stepping stone. Do you think lessons learned from Artemis I will influence how we approach Mars exploration? I can't help but feel that this interplanetary strategy is going to change our understanding of both the Moon and Mars.
      Lastly, it's worth mentioning how Artemis I's success sets the stage for international collaboration. With ESA and other agencies involved, it could pave the way for more joint missions in the future. What are your thoughts on the global impact of this mission?
    • MysteryFiles
      Tabby's Star: The Latest on Its Dimming Events
      By MysteryFiles
      Tabby's Star has always intrigued me with its unusual dimming patterns, but the latest observations seem to raise even more questions. According to recent studies, the star continues to exhibit these irregular dips in brightness that defy a straightforward explanation. There are theories ranging from dust clouds to potential megastructures, which makes it hard to settle on a single hypothesis. It's almost like the star is playing a game of cosmic hide-and-seek, and we’re left trying to figure out the rules.
      I find it interesting that despite all the advancements in our observational technology, we're still struggling to fully understand the behavior of this star. It was first noted for its strange dimming in 2015, and while we’ve had plenty of academic attention since then, the community seems split on what might be causing these fluctuations. Some researchers are even suggesting that the irregularity could be a sign of something artificial, which is a thought that definitely gets the imagination going.
      Then there’s the aspect of how these dimming events could relate to the search for extraterrestrial life. If we assume that there’s something out there that’s capable of creating such phenomena, what does that mean for our understanding of intelligent life in the universe? Are we limiting ourselves by only considering natural explanations? It’s a rabbit hole worth exploring.
      I wonder if anyone has thought about how the historical context of Tabby’s Star plays into this. There have been various instances throughout astronomical history where strange stellar phenomena led to speculation about alien civilizations. However, those cases often ended up being rooted in natural cosmic events. With Tabby’s Star, though, the ambiguity seems to persist, and it feels different somehow.
      What theories or ideas do you all hold about the potential causes of these dimmings? Is it more likely to be cosmic dust, an alien megastructure, or something else entirely? And given the star's unique behavior, how should we approach new data as it comes in? I’m curious to hear what everyone thinks.
      Also, has anyone kept an eye on the latest studies or publications regarding Tabby's Star? It might be helpful to keep this thread updated as new information becomes available, especially if it helps clarify this perplexing mystery.
    • AlienMan
      China's Secretive Spaceplane Releases Mystery Object Into Orbit
      By AlienMan
      China's mysterious reusable spaceplane program is back in the spotlight after commercial space surveillance networks detected the release of an unidentified object from the spacecraft during its latest mission.
      According to tracking data reported by space surveillance company LeoLabs, the object was detected near China's Shenlong ("Divine Dragon") reusable spaceplane on June 22. The spacecraft is currently conducting its fourth known orbital mission, but Chinese authorities have released very few details about its objectives or payloads. Space surveillance analysts quickly cataloged the newly released object and began tracking its movements independently.
      This is not the first time observers have seen unusual activity involving China's experimental spaceplane. During previous missions, tracking networks detected the release of other unidentified objects, leading analysts to speculate that the spacecraft may be testing technologies related to satellite deployment, orbital servicing, proximity operations, or reusable spacecraft systems. Similar questions have surrounded the United States' highly secretive X-37B spaceplane program for years.
      At this stage, nobody outside of the program knows exactly what the newly released object is. It could be a small subsatellite, a technology demonstration payload, a calibration target, or hardware associated with mission operations. Experts caution that releasing objects into orbit is not unusual for experimental spacecraft, but the secrecy surrounding the mission naturally fuels speculation.
      The event also highlights how commercial space tracking companies are becoming increasingly important in monitoring activities in Earth orbit. Organizations such as LeoLabs can often detect and track spacecraft maneuvers that would have remained largely invisible to the public only a decade ago.
      As China continues expanding its space capabilities with lunar missions, space stations, reusable spacecraft, and advanced satellite programs, missions like Shenlong are drawing growing attention from researchers, military analysts, and space enthusiasts alike. For now, the purpose of the newly released object remains unknown, but it serves as another reminder that some of the most intriguing activity in orbit is happening far from public view.
      What do you think? Is this simply a routine technology demonstration, or could China be testing more advanced capabilities for future space operations?
    • CosmicSignals
      Liquid Water on Enceladus: Is Life Just Around the Corner?
      By CosmicSignals
      The more I read about Enceladus, the more I find it puzzling that we aren't talking about it more when it comes to the search for extraterrestrial life. The fact that this moon has liquid water beneath its icy surface is such a compelling lead for astrobiologists. Water is a fundamental ingredient for life as we know it, yet discussions often overlook this fascinating world while focusing on Mars or Europa.
      The plumes of water vapor that erupt from Enceladus’ south pole are also intriguing. They contain organic molecules that could serve as building blocks for life. It makes me wonder whether we should be prioritizing missions to study these plumes more closely. Could we find biosignatures or even microbial life in those ejecta?
      I’ve read that some scientists believe the ocean beneath Enceladus’ ice could be in contact with a rocky seafloor, which would provide the necessary chemical reactions for life. It’s almost as if this moon is a hidden ocean world that hasn't fully revealed its secrets yet. What do you make of the idea that we might already be missing opportunities to investigate?
      There’s also the argument that if life exists there, it could be so different from what we know that it wouldn’t even register on our current detection methods. The concept of alien life in extreme conditions has become more accepted, but still, the silence is deafening. If Enceladus is indeed harboring life, how might it communicate, or even interact with us?
      Given the technological advancements in astrobiology, do you think missions to Enceladus should be ramped up? Or are we still too far from making any concrete discoveries? The potential discoveries that await beneath its icy crust could change everything we know about life in the universe.
      I can't help but feel a sense of urgency about exploring these outer moons. If one day we do confirm life on Enceladus, the implications for our understanding of life elsewhere would be monumental. It’s as if we’re on the brink of a major discovery, yet we’re still holding back. What if we discover that life is more common in our solar system than we ever imagined?
×
×
  • Create New...