Mummified 'Mermaid' to be analyzed by Japanese Scientists
-
Similar Topics
-
By UAPResearcher
In a recent episode from Disclosure Tonight, hosts Thomas Fessler, Mike, and Daryl analyze David Grusch's latest claims regarding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and their ties to national security. In this discussion, they focus on Grusch's assertions about a so-called 'Deep State' influence and the potential malevolence of certain UAP encounters. The episode aired on September 30, 2026, shortly after Grusch's appearance on Joe Rogan's popular podcast.
Grusch, a notable figure in the UAP discussion, has been vocal about the implications of governmental secrecy surrounding UAP. He argues that there are elements within the government that may not have the public's best interests at heart when it comes to transparency about UAP phenomena. This notion of a 'Deep State' suggests there are hidden agendas at play, complicating the narrative around UAPs and their true nature. The hosts engage with these ideas, considering the credibility of Grusch's claims while also discussing the broader implications for national security.
One of the critical points raised in the broadcast is the idea of 'malvolent UAP.' This term suggests that some of these aerial phenomena might pose a threat, which is a departure from the more common discourse that UAPs are merely subjects of curiosity or potential scientific exploration. The conversation delves into the nature of these unidentified objects, questioning whether they could be more than just advanced technology or natural phenomena. This aspect raises questions about the motivations behind UAP encounters and what they could mean for military operations and public safety.
The episode also touches on the historical context of UAP investigations within the military. With the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), there have been increasing calls for accountability and transparency regarding UAP incidents. Grusch's claims fit into this larger narrative, as they point to the necessity of re-evaluating how the government handles information surrounding UAPs. While the episode does not provide concrete evidence to support every claim made by Grusch, it emphasizes the urgency of these discussions in light of recent governmental disclosures and inquiries.
However, there are limitations to the conversation presented in this episode. The hosts and Grusch often rely on anecdotal evidence rather than hard data or verified reports, which can lead to skepticism about the claims. This raises the question of how much weight should be placed on personal testimonies versus documented evidence when discussing national security issues surrounding UAPs. Furthermore, the absence of critical analysis regarding the motivations behind governmental secrecy leaves some gaps in understanding the broader implications of these discussions.
As the episode concludes, it emphasizes the importance of dialogue about UAPs and their potential implications for society. The ongoing investigation into these phenomena by government bodies suggests that we are at a critical juncture in understanding UAPs. The claims made by Grusch, while compelling, must be scrutinized and explored further to grasp their full impact.
Given the complexities surrounding the concept of a 'Deep State' and the implications of malevolent UAP, how should we approach the discussion of national security in relation to UAP investigations? What steps can be taken to ensure transparency while also addressing the potential threats posed by these phenomena?
-
By Avi Loeb Medium
(Image credit: iStock/Getty)The White House, Congress and several federal agencies are currently investigating a loosely defined list of recent deaths and disappearances of about ten scientists and staff with potential ties to classified research. Congressmen James Comer — who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Eric Burlison — who chairs the Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy and Regulatory Affairs, stated officially here that they are investigating the cases as a potential threat to national security.
Publicly available information shows the circumstances surrounding these deaths and disappearances vary widely.
Related families deny a connection between the tragedies associated with their loved ones and prior classified work. In particular, Susan McCasland Wilkerson, wrote here that she wanted to dispel misinformation, since her husband William McCasland was retired for more than a decade before he disappeared, and therefore “It seems quite unlikely that he was taken to extract very dated secrets from him.” Julia Hicks, stated here that her father, Michael Hicks — a JPL scientist, had been struggling with known medical problems before his death a few years ago, and added: “From what I know of my dad, there’s no train of logic to follow that would implicate him in this potential federal investigation … I don’t understand the connection between my dad’s death and the other missing scientists.” In another case, MIT professor Nuno Louriero was killed by the same person who killed two students at Brown University three days earlier, Claudio Valente, who was a classmate of Louriero at the University of Lisbon in Portugal between 1995–2000 but failed to pursue an academic career after struggling socially and dropping out of a physics PhD program at Brown. Valente’s behavior is likely a case of academic grudge and resentment, as Louriero — with similar initial conditions, had a flourishing academic career.
President Trump called the pattern of missing scientists possibly random and stated to reporters: “Hopefully, I don’t know, coincidence, whatever you want to call it. But some of them were very important people, and we’re going to look at it over the next short period.”
So far, there is no reason to connect the dots or identify a pattern among the different cases. But humans tend to search for patterns even if they do not exist. There are thousands of nuclear and aerospace scientists in the U.S., and people die or go missing all the time.
In dozens of television and radio interviews that I had over the past week, I was asked about the missing scientists. This morning on “Wake Up America” in Newsmax, I clarified that I do not believe the cases are connected but the FBI should check if there are adversarial nations behind any one of them.
Nevertheless, I also added that the main problem we currently have is that science is missing from our national priorities. Instead of entertaining budget cuts in federal science agencies like NASA, NHI or NSF, the U.S. government should celebrate the benefits of science to global leadership, national security, economic prosperity and national pride, as evident from the success of recent projects like Artemis II, the Webb telescope or the LIGO gravitational-wave observatory. Cutting funding for science while supporting AI and quantum technologies is equivalent to cutting the roots of a tree while watering its brunches. American superiority in science and technology will not last long this way. The computer chips used in the latest AI systems were designed based on the scientific understanding of quantum mechanics through fundamental curiosity-driven research.
In short, the problem the U.S. has is not about “missing scientists” but about “missing science” in our national conversations.
True, the current culture of science has its challenges. Whereas, evidence-based science offers the best opportunity for us to learn, the pride and prejudice of dogmatic scientists can block that opportunity. As gatekeepers to new knowledge, scientists have the power to suppress innovation. With great powers comes great responsibility.
The efficiency of the scientific engine is measured by the number of breakthrough discoveries made relative to the resources allocated to research. Historical evidence suggests that disruptive science has been declining in recent decades, despite the increases in resources and size of the scientific community. Large communities are dominated by regression to the mean. They foster a dogmatic culture that bets on one possibility as the most likely to succeed. The reduced efficiency of scientific discovery in recent decades begs an alternative approach which will spans alternative strategies to explore the unknown.
The more we learn, the better we get at coping with our societal challenges. The technologies which make our quality of life better than that of past generations are based on the scientific knowledge we gather. Paying attention to anomalies, namely facts that do not line up with our expectations, could foster revolutionary discoveries.
Rather than obsess with depressing cases of death and disappearance of scientists, our federal agencies should promote an inspiring future for U.S. scientific leadership. The best is yet to come, if we will only let it be.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, former director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (2005–2026), and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.
Professional website:
https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/
Social media:
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb
https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb
View the full article
-
By USH
Joshua LeBlanc, a 29-year-old aerospace engineer at NASA, died in a car crash in Huntsville, Alabama, on July 22, 2025. He had been working directly on nuclear propulsion systems, contributing to NASA’s Space Nuclear Propulsion program and the DRACO project, an initiative focused on developing nuclear thermal engines for deep-space missions.
Now consider that alongside a growing list of individuals (now 12) connected to aerospace, defense, and nuclear research who have died or gone missing in recent years. They all surfaced under very different circumstances, yet within the same narrow field of expertise.
It does raise a reasonable question: at what point do these cases stop being viewed as isolated incidents? When placed side by side, the overlap becomes difficult to ignore.
Like many of the missing or dead scientists, also LeBlanc reportedly left behind his phone, wallet, and other personal belongings before leaving his home. More details on LeBlanc’s death can be found on Skywatch Signal.
Still, an important question remains: are all of these scientists truly missing or deceased as reported? Taken together, they would represent a highly specialized group, exactly the kind of team capable of developing advanced, potentially groundbreaking technologies in secrecy. It may sound far-fetched, but it leads to speculation: could some have been quietly recruited into covert programs, while others who refused faced darker outcomes?
To explore this idea, I posed the question to Chatgpt: “Who is behind the disappearance and deaths of scientists?”
The response featured an image generated by ChatGPT that pointed toward several possible explanations:
Click the image to view in full size.
Who is behind the disappearance and deaths of scientists 1. Global institutions, black budget syndicates, shadow networks or corporate or institutional control structures 2. Motives such as suppressing disruptive technologies, maintaining dominance over energy, defense, and information systems, protecting massive financial interests, and preventing large-scale societal shifts.
To keep control over classified programs 1. Reverse engineering efforts 2. Suppressed technologies 3. Breakthroughs in energy and propulsion 4. Highly classified space initiatives 5. Non-human technology
A broader pattern 1. The idea that transformative change is resisted 2. That knowledge equates to power, and power tends to protect itself 3. And that, in extreme interpretations, controlling the future could involve silencing those creating it
These ideas remain speculative, but when patterns appear, even loosely connected ones, they tend to invite deeper scrutiny.
View the full article
-
By USH
Something sinister is unfolding, something is going on: In a span of just nine months, nine high-level scientists and personnel in the United States have reportedly died or vanished under unusual circumstances:
Many of these scientists were connected to highly classified programs, and working on cutting-edge materials science including advanced plasma systems and the reverse engineering of exotic weaponry believed, by some, to originate from crashed UFOs.
1. William Neil McCasland — A former U.S. Air Force lieutenant general who held several high-ranking positions in military science and technology programs, advanced weapons development and classified aerospace programs. He had oversight of deeply classified programs, possibly including investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). (Although retired it is believed that he still was working behind the scenes) — Missing. (Just three days after President Trump ordered to open all UFO files.)
2. Monica Jacinto Reza — Aerospace engineer and Technical Fellow at Aerojet Rocketdyne, later associated with NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory — Missing.
3. Melissa Casias — Administrative assistant at Los Alamos National Laboratory — Missing.
4. Jacob Prichard — Acquisition Project Manager at the Air Force Research Laboratory Sensors Directorate — Reported suicide.
5. Jaymee Prichard — Finance specialist at the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center — Killed.
6. Jaime Gustitus — Operations Analysis Officer with the United States Air Force, working within the 711th Human Performance Wing — Killed.
7. Carl Grillmair — Astrophysicist at the Caltech Infrared Processing and Analysis Center — Killed.
8. Nuno F. Gomes Loureiro — Plasma physicist — Killed.
9. Jason Thomas — Chemical biologist — Found dead.
According to sources,they had been studying and attempting to reverse-engineer these technologies for years. So why, all of a sudden, have so many of them disappeared or killed, the past nine months.
This is no coincidence. As has happened time and again, when individuals get too close to the (ufo/alien) truth, they suddenly vanish, suffer fatal “accidents,” or are silenced altogether.
There appears to be a deeper connection, one tied to classified research on UFO technologies that challenge our current understanding of physics. Although the UFO phenomenon has become far more visible and difficult to dismiss in recent years, there are still powerful organizations operating behind the scenes, doing everything they can to keep these discoveries, all made possible through recovered alien technology, hidden from the public.
View the full article
-
By USH
Yes, there really is a massive “gravity hole” under the ice, known as the Antarctic Geoid Low (AGL). It’s one of the most extreme gravitational anomalies on Earth.
Instead, it’s a region where Earth’s gravitational pull is slightly weaker than average. Because of this, the planet’s “gravity surface”, called the geoid — dips by about 120 meters compared to the global norm. This subtle dip influences ocean behavior, sea level measurements, and even how ice sheets evolve over time.
Recent research, including studies published in Scientific Reports, has helped scientists better understand what’s causing it. The answer lies deep within Earth, far below the Antarctic ice. XX Over tens of millions of years, slow-moving currents in the mantle, the layer beneath Earth’s crust, have shifted dense material around the planet. These movements, including sinking tectonic slabs, reduce mass in certain regions. Less mass means weaker gravity.
Models suggest this anomaly has existed for at least 70 million years, dating back to the age of dinosaurs. It became significantly more pronounced between 50 and 30 million years ago, a period that also saw major climate shifts and the formation of Antarctica’s massive ice sheets. And importantly, it’s still evolving today, just at an incredibly slow pace.
This isn’t guesswork. Scientists used global earthquake data, advanced physics simulations, and reconstructions of Earth’s interior to map the anomaly with increasing precision.
That being said, Antarctica does remain one of the most restricted and least explored places on Earth. Protected zones, such as the Antarctic Treaty System. Given that scientists now acknowledge the existence of a massive gravity anomaly, it raises questions about whether it could be linked to the hollow Earth theory, and prompts us to wonder what might truly lie hidden beneath the ice, beyond what is currently revealed to the public. View the full article
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.