Jump to content

Possible Flying Saucer with Dome half buried in Antarctic Snow

USH
 Share

Recommended Posts

USH Rising Star

USH

Posted
Posted
A possible crashed UFO half buried in the snow found 6 km from an unknown station in the middle of nowhere in Antarctica. 

ufo%2Bwith%2Bdome%2Bantarctica.jpg

The upper part of the disc measures 30 meters whose dome appears to have broken off during the crash. 

It is said that NAZI UFO craft have been stationed in Antarctica before, during and after World War II and since the dome of the disc seems to have been built in the last century, we may wonder whether it is a NAZI UFO eg a Glocke as well as could it be that this station has served as air traffic control for NAZI UFOs in the past? 

Google Earth coordinates: 
Station: 76°14'23.26"S 112° 3'11.90"W 
Flying Saucer: 76°17'13.24"S 112° 9'46.32"W

 

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Topics

    • UAPResearcher
      New UFO/UAP Video Of Flying Disc Obtained By Jeremy Corbell
      By UAPResearcher
      Has anyone seen the new video shared by Elex Michaelson featuring a flying disc? It was obtained from Jeremy Corbell, who’s known for his work with UFO footage. The video showcases what appears to be a disc-shaped object, and it’s raising questions about the nature of UAP encounters.
      In the footage, the disc moves in a way that doesn’t seem typical for any known aircraft. Its dynamics and speed might suggest advanced technology, but without additional context, it’s hard to draw definite conclusions. Corbell has a history of presenting intriguing evidence, but this video alone doesn’t provide enough detail to ascertain the object's origin.
      Viewer reactions on the video have been mixed, with some expressing excitement about the footage and others remaining skeptical. It seems the community is divided between those who think this might be a significant piece of evidence and those who argue it could be misidentified phenomena. The lack of corroborating data or a clear identification leaves plenty of room for speculation.
      As we discuss this video, it’s important to consider the implications of such sightings. While it’s easy to jump to conclusions about advanced technology or extraterrestrial origins, we should also remember that misinterpretations can occur, especially with camera optics and atmospheric conditions. This need for careful analysis is crucial in the ongoing discussion around UAPs.
      What do you think this new footage tells us about the current state of UAP investigations? Are we progressing toward clearer answers, or are we still in the same place of uncertainty?
    • UAPResearcher
      Half of Americans skeptical about UFOs, according to recent poll
      By UAPResearcher
      A recent poll indicates that half of Americans are skeptical about UFOs. The details of this poll couldn't be verified due to access restrictions, but the headline raises interesting questions about public perception of UAPs.
      It’s striking that even with increasing reports from military personnel and official government acknowledgment, many people still doubt the existence of unidentified aerial phenomena. This skepticism seems to persist despite the ongoing UAP investigations and disclosures.
      Recent hearings and the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) by the Department of Defense have aimed to increase transparency surrounding UAP encounters, yet the divide in belief remains. How does this skepticism impact the willingness of witnesses—especially military pilots—to come forward with their own accounts? If half the population doubts these phenomena, it might discourage potential witnesses from sharing their experiences for fear of disbelief or ridicule.
    • SpaceObserver
      Could Starship Really Make Mars Colonization Possible?
      By SpaceObserver
      With all the recent testing of SpaceX's Starship, I can't help but wonder about its actual potential for Mars colonization. The sheer size of Starship is impressive, but it's not just about building a big rocket. I'm curious about how it can handle the challenges of making a sustainable presence on Mars.
      One of the key aspects that stands out to me is the ability to refuel in orbit. This could allow for multiple Starship missions to be launched without the need for heavy lifting all the way from Earth. It seems like a smart move, especially when considering the logistics of transporting equipment and supplies to Mars.
      I remember when NASA's Apollo missions were just focused on getting humans to the Moon and back. Now, SpaceX is aiming to set up a base on another planet. What do you think are the major technological hurdles we still need to overcome to make this a reality?
      Additionally, the partnership between NASA and SpaceX is intriguing. With the Artemis missions aiming for the Moon first, do you believe there’s a strong enough synergy to help accelerate the timeline for Mars missions? SpaceX's work with NASA could definitely pave the way for advancements in life support systems and surface operations.
      Also, could the advancements in reusable rockets change the way we think about space travel altogether? The idea of reusing spacecraft for multiple missions sounds like a game changer. If Starship can make interplanetary travel more cost-effective, it might just open the door for more people to venture beyond Earth.
      Lastly, what do you see as the ultimate goal for Mars colonization? Is it purely scientific exploration, or could it lead to a new frontier for humanity? I'm excited to see how this all unfolds and to discuss the implications of SpaceX's plans for Mars.
    • Avi Loeb Medium
      Are Interstellar Helicopters Possible?
      By Avi Loeb Medium
      The Ingenuity helicopter on Mars. (Image credit: NASA)Helicopters fly by using an engine to spin rotor blades, which create lift and thrust by pushing air away, similarly to a bird flapping its wings or a swimmer moving limbs in water. The spinning blades act as rotating wings, generating low net pressure above and high pressure below to produce lift. A tail rotor or a counter-rotating blade system is essential to cancel torque, preventing the body from spinning in the opposite direction. Forward motion is triggered by tilting the blade plane.
      An image taken from the Orion capsule on April 3, 2026, showing the thin atmosphere of Earth against the blackness of space. (Image credit: Reid Wiseman, NASA)Helicopter propulsion relies on an ambient medium. The blades gain thrust by pushing the surrounding medium in the opposite direction. The typical speed acquired by air around the blades is of order hundreds of meters per second. Momentum conservation implies that the blades can propel the helicopter body to a speed of this magnitude only if they push an air mass comparable to the body’s mass. Since the mass density of air at sea-level is a few hundred times smaller than the average mass per unit volume of a helicopter, the vehicle must push a volume of air that is at least a hundred times larger than the volume of its body in order to move forward at a speed of a hundred meters per second.
      An artist’s illustration of NASA’s “Skyfall” helicopter mission to Mars in 2028. (Image credit: AeroVironment)NASA had just announced a plan to launch the first nuclear-powered interplanetary spacecraft before the end 2028 on a mission to Mars called Skyfall. This Space Reactor-1 Freedom will carry three small helicopters to explore a possible human landing site on the Martian surface.
      The same principle of momentum conservation applies to helicopters flying in the thin atmosphere of Mars. This dilute atmosphere, 95% of which is carbon dioxide (CO2), has a mass density that is 1.6% of the Earth’s atmosphere at sea-level. This implies that a Martian helicopter must process a volume of ambient gas that is about 60 times larger than in Earth’s atmosphere, in order to gain a comparable thrust. If CO2-breathing birds had existed in the Martian atmosphere, they would have needed wings that are roughly 8 times larger than oxygen-breathing counterparts on Earth in order to fly at the same speed. The lift of these hypothetical wings would have benefitted from the lower Martian surface gravity, only 38% of that on Earth.
      Image of Mars and its thin atmosphere. (Image credit: Emirates Mars Mission).But there are Solar System objects with even thinner atmospheres, as announced today in a paper published here in Nature magazine. The Kuiper belt object 2002 XV93 with a diameter of about 500 kilometers was discovered to possess an extremely thin atmosphere with a density that is ten million times smaller than Earth’s atmosphere at sea-level, based on observations of a stellar occultation from 2024. This delicate atmosphere may have been created by volcanic eruptions or a comet strike. In such a thin atmosphere, a helicopter would struggle to push enough gas in order to move around.
      An artist’s illustration of the Kuiper belt object 2002 XV93 occulting a background star, an event which provided in 2024 evidence for a very thin atmosphere around the object. (Image credit: Ko Arimatsu/NAOJ)As we consider even more dilute environments, one might wonder: are interstellar helicopters feasible?
      The average gas density in interstellar space is sextillion (10^{21}) times smaller than in the Earth’s atmosphere. This means that a helicopter would need to cross the entire Milky-Way disk before encountering enough gas mass to push its body to a speed of 100 meters per second. Such a journey would take more than the age of the Universe.
      Intergalactic helicopters are even more impractical, because the mean density of the intergalactic medium is a million times smaller than the interstellar medium. On average, the Universe contains a single proton per cubic meter.
      This is bad news for cosmic travelers who enjoy helicopter rides. But it is good news for those who enjoy rocket rides, because interstellar space is so dilute that any rocket will not be slowed down by friction on the surrounding medium. Interstellar rockets can reach Earth without much resistance. In contrast to a helicopter, a rocket ejects its burnt fuel gas from its exhaust and does not rely on the ambient medium for propulsion.
      Even millimeter-thin membranes, in the form of light-sails or pieces of broken Dyson spheres, can traverse the entire Milky-Way without encountering much resistance, as I calculated here, here and here.
      ***
      Are there any extraterrestrial probes in persistent orbits around Earth right now? One would imagine that if there were any extraterrestrial satellites in orbit around Earth, the U.S. intelligence agencies would have noticed them. The U.S. Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, surely knows whether there are any unidentified, non-human made probes around Earth. If they exist, will we hear about them through the declassification directive from President Trump? Time will tell.
      ABOUT THE AUTHOR
      (Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.
      Professional website:
      https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/
      Social media:
      https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
      https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb
      https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
      https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb
      View the full article
    • USH
      Flying saucer–shaped object filmed over São Paulo highway, Brazil but what was it?
      By USH
      The footage was reportedly recorded by Michelli Azuma on December 25, 2025, at around 9:52 a.m., while traveling along the Anhanguera Highway near Campinas, São Paulo. 

       In the video, a disc-shaped object appears to glide across the sky at a seemingly high speed. Its movement stands out when compared to the witness’s vehicle, estimated to be traveling at roughly 100 km/h, making the object’s motion appear unusually fast and controlled. 
      As with many such sightings, questions quickly arise: is this a genuine unidentified flying object, or could it be a drone or another advanced, man-made aerial device.  
      That uncertainty is further amplified in an era of rapid artificial intelligence development, where distinguishing between authentic footage and fabricated or digitally altered content has become increasingly difficult. 
      In the modern UFO debate, the line between what is real and what is fake has never been more blurred but the rise of AI generated UFO videos doesn’t disprove UFOs, but it raises the bar for evidence and while many sightings are eventually explained, a small percentage remain unresolved.
        View the full article
×
×
  • Create New...