Jump to content

About Aliens and Earthlings

Avi Loeb Medium
 Share

Recommended Posts

Avi Loeb Medium Newbie

Avi Loeb Medium

Posted
Posted
1*onxaw3IPpeCTA-uH0NXfzQ.jpeg
(Image credit: Lotem Loeb; May 22, 2026)

Below is a set of cosmos-wide set of questions (marked in boldface), posed to me today by a reporter in Athens, Greece, along with my answers.

***

We are living in an era of wars, climate crisis, political polarization and technological acceleration. As someone who spends his life looking at the cosmos, how do you make sense of this particular moment in human history? What kind of era do you think we are living in?

We are approaching a major revolution in human history. The exponential growth of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and the potential discovery of alien intelligence could make our future completely different than our past.

Discovering that we are not the only technological civilization in our cosmic neighborhood resembles hearing a knock on the door by a neighbor. Hopefully, the outside perspective will quiet down the loud arguments among our family members on Earth.

The recognition that we are not alone holds the potential of changing our priorities from conflicts to cooperation among all humans on Earth. We are all in the same boat when dealing with interstellar visitors. At the same time, it is important to make sure that no passenger within our boat acts irresponsibly because such behavior affects all of us.

The Galileo Project is now five years old. What have you learned that you didn’t expect to learn when you started it?

The research team of the Galileo Project had monitored millions of objects in the sky and learned that the vast majority of them are human made or natural phenomena. We are seeking rare outliers to these categories. Even if one object is extraterrestrial, it would be the biggest discovery that humanity ever made. We only need to find one. That particular object could inform us of new science and technology that we do not possess, as well as better our geopolitical priorities on Earth and ambitions in space.

You recently announced that the Project can now measure distances to objects in the sky with better than 10% accuracy, using multiple observatories separated by 10 kilometers. What does this mean in practical terms for your research?

The ability to triangulate objects by observing them from three different directions is a new feature that the Galileo Project employs in Nevada, where we have three observing units separated apart by 10 kilometers. This allows us to infer position, velocity and acceleration of each object in three dimensions. From a single vantage point, a nearby object — like a bug or a bee, may appear to be large or cross the sky fast even though it moves at a relatively low speed. The UFO files released by the Pentagon over the past month do not provide distance information. As a result, it is impossible to conclusively determine whether any of the recorded objects moves outside the performance envelope of human-made technologies, like balloons, drones or airplanes.

After the release of the UFO files in May 2026, your team concluded that none of the objects requires an exotic origin. Were you disappointed by that — or relieved?

I would like to know the nature of all anomalous objects in the sky. In that context, I was disappointed by the lack of sufficient information to make this determination. We are left with uncertainty and need higher quality scientific data.

The good news is that we do not need to wait for the government to tell us what lies in the sky. We can simply look up. This is what the Galileo Project under my leadership is doing by employing state-of-the-art instrumentation and computers.

The government has better quality data, for example from the fleet of satellites that it employs to image the Earth at high spatial resolution of a few centimeters, but such data was declassified as of yet.

Does Oumuamua still occupy your thinking, or have you moved on to other hypotheses?

As a scientist, I am driven by data. The most interesting data carries anomalies which potentially flag new knowledge. Unfortunately, we have acquired limited data on the first recognized interstellar object, 1I/`Oumuamua, which left us in 2017 with uncertainty about its nature. It was most likely a flat object with an extreme shape based on the fact that the amount of sunlight it reflected changed by a factor of 10 as it was tumbling every 8 hours. In addition, it was pushed away from the Sun by a mysterious force, without showing any evidence for cometary outgassing. I proposed that this force was simply a result of the reflection of sunlight, which meant that the object is very thin. Three years later, another object named 2020 SO was discovered by the same telescope in Hawaii. This one was definitely pushed by reflecting sunlight. Within a few months, 2020 SO was identified as an upper stage of a lunar lander mission by NASA — launched in 1966. We know it is technological and made of thin walls because we launched it. The question is who launched 1I/`Oumuamua?

1I/`Oumuamua’s anomalies intrigued me to study in detail subsequent interstellar objects like 3I/ATLAS which was discovered in 2025. Shortly after 3I/ATLAS was reported to move in the orbital plane of the planets around the Sun to within 4.88 degrees, I defined the Loeb Classification Scale which ranks an interstellar object that is definitely of natural origin (namely, a natural rock or iceberg) as 0 and an object that definitely represents alien technology and poses a threat to humanity as 10. I ranked the anomalies of `I/`Oumuamua and 3I/ATLAS as 4 on the Loeb Scale, as they feature anomalies that are intriguing but insufficient to lead to the conclusion that they represent alien technology.

The Pacific expedition retrieved materials from the 2014 interstellar meteor IM1. What exactly did you find, and why do you consider it significant?

We recovered molten droplets, less than a millimeter in size, from the crash site of the interstellar meteor IM1 and found that a tenth of them have a chemical and isotopic composition that deviate from solar system materials and are most likely extrasolar. If true, this is the first time that scientists studied in a laboratory the materials from a large object that arrived from outside the solar system.

If IM1 or Oumuamua were proven to be of artificial origin, what would change for humanity and what wouldn’t?

Discovering alien technology would change our perspective about our place in the Universe and inspire us to invest more in space exploration. We might be tempted to visit the backyard of those who sent probes to our backyard. Religious people would realize that God is not a parent who attends to a single child. The conceptual revolution will take time to affect the mindset of all people on Earth. Some may continue their daily routines and obsession with earthly matters for years after the discovery.

Most of your academic colleagues continue to treat your research with skepticism. Does that hurt you, or does it drive you?

I learned to ignore the audience. Good basketball players keep their eyes on the ball, not the audience.

Is there a line between scientific courage and scientific irresponsibility — and who gets to draw it?

Of course. Scientific progress is driven by paying attention to anomalies in data. It requires childlike curiosity. Scientific irresponsibility is to engage for decades in a belief system that cannot be tested by collecting data on the physical reality that we all share. You might think that I am referring to religious cults, but I am actually referring to the mainstream of the physics community which contemplated in recent decades the untestable concepts of string theory or the multiverse.

You often say that science must follow the data wherever it leads. But data requires interpretation. Where does the scientist’s subjectivity begin?

Subjectivity begins in what the science community regards as worth the effort of data collection. It took four decades between the suggestion made by the astronomer Otto Struve to search for Jupiter-mass planets close to Sun-like stars and the discovery of the hot Jupiter 51-Pegasi b because observers decided not to waste their time in search for such systems. Revolutionary data requires the willingness to collect it. The lack of curiosity by risk-averse gatekeepers is what suppresses innovation in science.

Doing science by consensus is bad for progress, because the beaten path might lead towards a dead end. An example is supersymmetry which was adopted by the mainstream of theoretical physics and not discovered in its natural parameter space by CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.

If extraterrestrial intelligence exists, why do you think it hasn’t communicated with us in an unambiguous way? What is the most compelling explanation you have?

We may not be interesting to them. We tend to think that they care about us for the same reason that we believed that we are at the center of the Universe.

Instead of thinking about ourselves as the focus of cosmic attention, we should seek more accomplished partners. For our blind date with interstellar partners, we should aim high and not low. Instead of searching for the most abundant and mediocre dating partners in the form of primitive lifeforms like microbes, the mainstream of the astronomy community should search for beings who are more intelligent than we are.

The Fermi Paradox remains unanswered. Which version of it do you find most plausible today?

They might be right here. We have not done a proper search in our cosmic backyard.

If it were proven that we are alone in the universe, would that be good news or bad news for humanity?

It would definitely be good news, akin to finding a more accomplished sibling in our family of intelligent beings. We might be jealous of their accomplishments, but at the same time — they might inspire us to do better.

You studied philosophy before turning to physics. How much has philosophy shaped the way you do science?

I am interested in the most fundamental questions about our existence. As a scientist, I narrow down this set of questions to those that we can answer by collecting data.

You have written that curiosity matters more than certainty. In a world that demands quick answers, how do you teach tolerance for uncertainty?

Uncertainty is the most common condition in practicing science. We have to live with it because our knowledge is an island in an ocean of ignorance. The science influencers who give us a false sense of certainty through papers or social media posts might be guiding us in the wrong direction. In 1894, the physicist Albert A. Michaelson argued that physics is over and what remains is measuring the constants of nature to the fifth decimal point. This was a decade before Special Relativity revolutionized our concept of spacetime, two decades before gravity was interpreted by General Relativity as the curvature of spacetime and three decades before Quantum Mechanics revolutionized the way we view the physical reality.

If you could send a single message to an extraterrestrial intelligence, not a scientific one, but a human one, what would you say?

“Where is the nearest hub of intelligent civilizations?”

Outside the laboratory and beyond the telescopes, what do you love most in life? Not the scientist, not the professor. The person. What truly matters to you?

I love my family and enjoy nature. I jog 5 kilometers every morning before sunrise, in the company of birds, wild turkey, bunnies and ducks. If AI will bring us to a catastrophic singularity, I plan to disconnect from the internet and live in harmony with nature.

On warm summer nights, when you step outside and look up at the stars, what goes through your mind? Not the scientist’s thoughts. The human ones.

The stars of the Milky-Way galaxy which streams through the Local Group look to me like lights from the cabins of a giant spaceship sailing through space. I often wonder whether there are other passengers in these cabins.

You were born in Israel, you served in the Israeli army, and you have spent your career at Harvard looking for common ground between humanity and the cosmos. How do you carry that tension, between a world that keeps dividing itself and a universe that knows no borders?”

I ignore the limitations of the current human activities on Earth and focus on what will be remembered in the history books of the Milky-Way galaxy within billions of years from now.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*S6_p_hsrRs1mQ-tjQ_MKGw.jpeg
(Image credit: Lotem Loeb; May 22, 2026)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

Professional website:

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/

Social media:

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb

https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Topics

    • DeepSkyExplorer
      The Friendship Case: An Alliance Between Humans And Aliens?
      By DeepSkyExplorer
      The video titled 'Aliens in the Ocean, and a War for Earth' brings up an intriguing narrative surrounding the so-called Friendship Case. This case claims that for over two decades, humans in Italy were involved in a secret alliance with an alien civilization known as the Friends, who supposedly reside in vast underground bases beneath the Adriatic Sea. The premise is that humans delivered supplies like fruit, water, and chemicals to these aliens, fostering a relationship that could potentially change our understanding of extraterrestrial life.
      One of the more striking claims is that the Friends could teleport supplies and read minds, attributing to them a level of technology that far surpasses our own. This raises questions about the nature of such interactions and whether they could even be classified as a partnership, or if they lean more toward exploitation. It’s fascinating to think about what kind of agreement could lead to such a level of trust between two vastly different species. The reliance on human trust as a foundation for this alliance is particularly interesting; could we really trust an alien civilization, and how would that trust be established?
      However, the video also dives into the evidence surrounding the Friendship Case and discusses where it potentially falls short. The concept of a hidden alien civilization living beneath the sea is certainly captivating, but what tangible proof do we have of their existence? While the narrative builds a strong story, one has to critically assess the sources of evidence presented. The lack of physical proof could easily undermine the validity of such claims, leading one to wonder if they are more folklore than fact.
      Moreover, the idea of aliens reshaping the ground to build their hidden world is captivating but also raises questions about the possible ecological and societal impacts of such activities. If there truly were advanced beings living under the Adriatic, how would their presence affect marine life, environmental regulations, and human communities above? These are not just abstract considerations but real-world implications that go hand-in-hand with the idea of extraterrestrial life.
      Viewer reactions to the video seem divided, with some intrigued by the idea of a secret alliance, while others are skeptical of the claims made. This spectrum of perspectives highlights the ongoing debate about what constitutes credible evidence in the realm of alien life. As we navigate the complexities of such narratives, recognizing the distinction between fiction and possible reality becomes essential.
      As we explore the Friendship Case further, it poses an important question: What would it take for humanity to genuinely accept and trust an extraterrestrial civilization? This dilemma goes beyond one narrative and dives deep into our values, ethics, and readiness to embrace the unknown. It’s a thought-provoking topic that keeps the conversation about alien life and interspecies relationships alive and relevant.
    • DeepSkyExplorer
      The Friendship Case: Aliens Beneath The Adriatic Sea
      By DeepSkyExplorer
      The recent video titled 'Aliens in the Ocean, and a War for Earth' dives into a fascinating and controversial topic known as the Friendship Case. It presents a narrative about an alien civilization referred to as the 'Friends,' who supposedly reside in vast bases beneath the Adriatic Sea. This concept raises some intriguing possibilities about the relationship between humanity and potential extraterrestrial beings.
      The video claims that for over two decades, a group of individuals in Italy engaged in a unique operation where they would load trucks with supplies, leaving them for the Friends to collect. This delivery system implies a significant level of cooperation between humans and an alien civilization, which, according to the narrative, has advanced capabilities like teleportation and mind-reading. However, the idea that such interactions could depend as much on human trust as on technological prowess is both captivating and puzzling.
      Despite the compelling storytelling, the evidence supporting the Friendship Case remains tenuous at best. The video hints at a secret alliance but does not provide concrete proof of these encounters or the existence of the Friends themselves. The skepticism around such claims often stems from the lack of verifiable evidence, raising questions about the authenticity of the narratives presented. How much of the tale is myth, and how much is based on actual events?
      Moreover, the discussion about these alien bases relies heavily on anecdotal accounts rather than scientific data. As intriguing as the concept of hidden worlds beneath our oceans may be, the absence of empirical evidence leaves room for doubt. This discrepancy is particularly crucial in the realm of astrobiology, where claims require rigorous verification to hold any weight in scientific discourse.
      In considering the historical context, there have been various claims and sightings throughout the years that suggest interactions with extraterrestrial beings. However, many of these claims have been debunked or remain unverified. The Friendship Case appears to fit within a larger pattern of stories that challenge our understanding of life beyond Earth but often lack the necessary substantiation to shift from theory to fact.
      As the conversation continues around alien life and potential contact scenarios, one has to wonder about the implications of such narratives. If the Friendship Case were to be validated, what would it mean for our understanding of life in the universe? Conversely, if it remains a fabrication or exaggeration, what impact do these stories have on the serious study of extraterrestrial life? Exploring these questions can help shed light on the delicate balance between curiosity and skepticism in the search for alien existence.
    • SpaceObserver
      Did Aliens Tell Us Not To Return To The Moon?
      By SpaceObserver
      This topic feels particularly intriguing as it touches on the ever-fascinating relationship between public perception and the reality of our lunar explorations. In a recent NewsNation video, journalist Ross Coulthart takes on viral claims suggesting that astronauts like Neil Armstrong were secretly warned against returning to the moon, a notion that plays into our collective fascination with extraterrestrial life. However, Coulthart dismisses these claims, emphasizing that they lack credible evidence. Instead, he points out that NASA has real questions to answer regarding certain anomalous objects observed near the lunar surface.
      Coulthart's skepticism towards the viral narrative about astronauts' warnings is grounded in a lack of substantiated proof. He stresses that while these claims can easily capture the public's imagination, they don’t hold up under scrutiny. This brings us back to NASA's role in lunar exploration and the importance of transparency in communicating findings about the moon, particularly as we're gearing up to return with upcoming missions.
      One aspect that Coulthart highlights revolves around the need for NASA to properly address the existence of strange objects near the moon. While he doesn’t delve into specifics, the notion that there are unexplained phenomena in our immediate cosmic neighborhood raises valid points for scientific inquiry. The ongoing efforts of missions like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and the Artemis program are vital, not just for new discoveries, but also for keeping the public informed and engaged.
      With the Artemis program set to bring humans back to the moon, the timing of this discussion is significant. As we prepare for a new era of lunar exploration, questions about what we might encounter—whether it be geological findings or unexpected artifacts—are more relevant than ever. Coulthart’s remarks underline the necessity for NASA to provide clarity and context about these anomalies, ensuring that speculation doesn’t overshadow scientific validity.
      Moreover, the way we communicate about our findings can shape public perception. If NASA fails to adequately explain the nature of these anomalies, it could inadvertently fuel conspiracy theories. This cycle of speculation can detract from genuine scientific discourse and the excitement surrounding space exploration. It’s crucial for scientists and agencies to bridge the gap between their findings and public understanding.
      As we look ahead to lunar missions, the conversation surrounding the moon’s unexplained features and the myths that spring from them reminds us that exploration is as much about discovering the unknown as it is about understanding what we already know. Given the mixed reception of Coulthart's video, it raises a broader question: how should NASA enhance its communication strategies to foster a better public understanding of lunar anomalies while minimizing sensationalism?
    • MysteryFiles
      UFO Whistleblower Claims Government is Hiding 4 Species of Aliens: Discussion and Analysis
      By MysteryFiles
      This is the kind of video that works best when people separate the interesting claims from the parts that still need evidence.
      This has me reflecting on the historical context of government investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the secrecy that often shrouds these topics. It's intriguing to think about how this compares to past cases, such as the Roswell incident or the Navy pilots' encounters in 2004 and 2015, which prompted a wave of renewed interest in transparency regarding UAPs.
      In the video, various claims are made regarding the nature of these alien species, their technological advancements, and how long the government has known about their existence. This kind of information raises questions about the integrity of the governmental approach to UAP disclosure. What are the implications of hiding such monumental information from the public? The recent congressional UAP hearings and the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) are steps towards accountability, but this new whistleblower testimony complicates things significantly. It suggests that even with these strides, there may still be layers of obfuscation.
      The whistleblower alleges that not only are there multiple species, but that there is an active effort to reverse-engineer their technology. If true, this could explain some of the military’s most advanced aerial capabilities, which have often been attributed to cutting-edge human innovation. The video also hints at specific incidents where military personnel purportedly encountered these beings or their crafts, which could align with FOIA releases from the Pentagon that hint at unexplained phenomena.
      One standout moment in the video comes when the whistleblower refers to specific cases that appear to have been documented but remain classified. This could open a door to further inquiry and FOIA requests. It makes me wonder about the historical incidents that have been swept under the rug. What other cases, perhaps lesser-known, might reveal more about these alleged encounters? It’s possible there are documents from the 1940s, 50s, or even more recent military reports that detail interactions without the public’s knowledge.
      Engaging with this material invites a range of theories, and I would love to hear your thoughts. Given the claims made, how do you feel about the government’s transparency regarding UAPs? Do you think there is a credible basis for the assertion that multiple alien species are being concealed? Also, do you believe that the current governmental framework, including the AARO, is equipped to handle such significant revelations, should they come to light? This keeps getting more intriguing, and I look forward to hearing your insights on this matter.
    • DisclosureWatch
      Discussing Hybrid Aliens: What Types Exist?
      By DisclosureWatch
      I recently stumbled upon a YouTube video titled 'What types of alien hybrids are there?' which has sparked a lot of interest and debate in the community. While the concept of alien hybrids is fascinating, I find myself skeptical about some of the claims made in the video. For instance, the idea that certain alien species have been genetically mixing with humans raises many questions about the evidence behind such assertions. Are we merely entertaining speculative theories, or is there credible research that could substantiate these claims?
      The video suggests various types of hybrids, categorizing them based on their supposed traits and origins. However, it seems crucial to remember that much of this narrative relies heavily on anecdotal accounts and interpretations rather than scientific validation. In the realm of astrobiology and extraterrestrial life, we should push for evidence-based discussions. How do we differentiate between legitimate scientific inquiry into possible life forms and sensationalized theories that lack concrete proof?
      Moreover, this topic of hybrids ties into the broader conversation about the existence of alien species and their potential interactions with humanity. As we delve deeper into the astrobiological search for life, it’s essential to consider what credible signals we may have received from beyond our planet. Have there been any documented communications or signals that could suggest the existence of such hybrids? Or are we simply projecting our human experiences onto hypothetical extraterrestrial scenarios?
      While the fascination with hybrids often captivates popular imagination, I believe it is paramount to focus our inquiries on verifiable scientific findings. The recent revelations from Congress regarding the AARO and the ongoing discussions around potential evidence of extraterrestrial life are steps in the right direction. Yet, we must ensure that our discussions remain grounded in scientific rigor. This also raises the question of how much of what we understand about potential alien life forms and their interactions with us is shaped by cultural narratives versus scientific reality.
      To further this discussion, I’d love to hear thoughts from others on how the hybrid theory fits into our current understanding of astrobiology. Are there specific scientific studies or evidence that you believe lend credibility to the idea of hybridization between humans and extraterrestrial life? Or do you think it’s primarily a cultural phenomenon that reflects our own desires and fears about the unknown? Let’s explore these questions together and see where the evidence truly lies.
×
×
  • Create New...