Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*1tQLEejZ5oGenTvos3Ka3g.jpeg
The symmetric system of three jets emanating from the nucleus of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS (separately from the primary anti-tail jet) after the circularly symmetric glow was removed by the Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter, based on a Hubble Space Telescope image taken on November 30, 2025. (Image credit: T. Scarmato and A. Loeb 2026)

A new paper (accessible here) that I co-authored today with Toni Scarmato analyzed images of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope over the past five months. After removing the circularly-symmetric glow around the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS using the Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter, we identified three jets emanating from the nucleus that are equally separated from each other in sky projection by about 120 degrees in addition to a primary anti-tail jet pointed at the Sun.

Whether these jets are technological thrusters or pockets of ice that happened to be oriented symmetrically on the surface of a natural iceberg, the outflows of gas and dust in these three jets exerted thrusts through the rocket effect, which resulted in the observed non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS (as summarized in a paper that I co-authored with Valentin Thoss and Andi Burkert, accessible here). Our new paper links, for the first time, the directions and momentum flows in these three jets to the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS.

In our previous paper (accessible here), we demonstrated that the jet system wobbles with a period of 7.2 hours, likely as a result the rotation of the nucleus. We concluded that the jet structure wobbles around the rotation axis with a characteristic angular excursion of about 20 degrees, and the rotation axis is aligned with the sunward direction to within about 20 degrees.

Building on this inferred jet system and periodic wobble analysis of 3I/ATLAS, our new paper measures the observed jet position angles and links them to the non-gravitational acceleration components in three dimensions. We use the sky projection and images of the three persistent jets to estimate the order-of-magnitude thrust that each of them provides to the nucleus. Altogether, our analysis provides consistency between the properties of the three jets and the inferred non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS, strengthening the evidence that the rocket effect explains the deviations of its trajectory from the path expected from gravity alone.

We adopted the observed jet position angles (PAs) in the sky (with North=0◦, East=90◦) on November 30, 2025 as follows:

• Jet1: PA = 65◦, • Jet2: PA = 290◦, • Jet3: PA = 175◦.

Our analysis identifies Jet2 as the dominant contributor to the transverse non-gravitational acceleration. The table below shows the breakdown of the contributions from the three jets to the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS, a [with components (A1,A2,A3)], in meters per second squared:

1*BwErEuoKSgFAAzUpvTMhxw.jpeg

The complete set of Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images is available here.

The symmetric configuration of three jets plus the anti-tail jet raises the question of whether they might constitute a technological system designed for stabilizing the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS. A recent paper by Bo Andree (accessible here) suggested that the

minimal approach for steering an interstellar comet along a controlled trajectory indeed matches this 3+1 jet configuration. By relaxing the full six-degree-of-freedom control to forward-cone steering — sufficient for practical navigation — the paper showed that four thrusters are required: one primary jet and three secondary jets separated symmetrically by 120 degrees from each other. The secondary 3-jets synthesize continuous in-plane steering, while the primary (anti-tail) jet provides low-bandwidth attitude shaping: as the body rotates, the primary-jet torque direction sweeps predictably over a cycle, enabling out-of-plane steering via phase-scheduled firing.

This highlights the fundamental question: is the observed 3+1 jet system around 3I/ATLAS a technological signature?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, former director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (2005–2026), and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

Professional website:

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/

Social media:

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb

https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By DeepSkyExplorer
      It’s intriguing to think about how certain cases seem to defy explanation, and the YouTube video titled 'Three Deaths Filed as Alien Encounters' dives into three particularly eerie incidents. One case describes a man who goes out for potatoes and reappears five days later, looking well-groomed but with chemical burns on his neck. What happened during those missing days? It’s a small detail, yet it raises so many questions about the circumstances surrounding his disappearance.
      Another chilling story involves two television repairmen near São Paulo. They ascend a hill with handwritten instructions, cut lead into masks, and then vanish without a trace. The note found with them suggested they knew exactly what to do, but why did they never return? The lack of any suspects or explanations is haunting, and it makes you think about what they may have encountered on that hill.
      The third case is no less perplexing—a fisherman crosses a quiet reservoir but never comes back. What’s left of him raises even more questions: there are no wounds, no signs of struggle, and even more unnervingly, no organs. In each of these cases, the files close with a similar refrain: no suspects, no causes, and no answers. This pattern is unsettling, especially given how often we associate unexplained phenomena with alien encounters.
      Looking at these incidents through the lens of government investigation and potential UAP connections is interesting. While the video doesn’t delve deep into official records or declassified files, it does evoke the kind of mysterious occurrences that often lead to speculation about extraterrestrial involvement. The lack of clarity in the outcomes of these cases reflects a broader trend in how we process and understand unexplained events.
      It’s crucial to consider the nature of evidence presented in these stories. Are they merely anecdotal, or is there something more substantial that ties them to a larger narrative regarding alien life? The absence of clear conclusions leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Perhaps these cases are more about highlighting gaps in our understanding of human experience than they are about extraterrestrial visits.
      With the growing interest in UAP disclosures and the government’s increased transparency, it’s worth asking: what would it take for these mysterious deaths to be thoroughly investigated by authorities? Or are they simply too far removed from conventional understandings of investigation? The unresolved nature of these incidents opens the door for a wider discussion on how society perceives the unknown and the limits of official inquiry into such bizarre occurrences.
    • By DeepSkyExplorer
      The YouTube video titled "Three Deaths Filed as Alien Encounters" presents a series of eerie, unexplained cases that are difficult to rationalize. Each story seems to point toward a strange and unsettling conclusion, yet the lack of concrete evidence leaves us with more questions than answers. For instance, one narrative describes a man who goes out for potatoes and returns five days later, disoriented and with chemical burns. What could have caused this? The video's format suggests a connection to alien encounters, but the evidence is circumstantial at best.
      Another case features two television repairmen from São Paulo who vanish while carrying handwritten instructions. They were supposedly told when to lie down, which is quite bizarre. The fact that they leave behind a note with such specific direction raises eyebrows, but again, there's no follow-up evidence that could clarify their fate. It's an odd blend of human behavior and what sounds like a science fiction plot.
      The third story involves a fisherman who disappears from a reservoir, only to be found with no visible wounds or organs. This detail is particularly chilling, as it suggests a scenario that defies typical explanations for disappearance and death. The absence of struggle and the intact condition of the body lead viewers to wonder about possible explanations beyond the ordinary.
      In examining these narratives, it’s crucial to consider the cultural and psychological factors at play. Stories of alien encounters often serve as a reflection of societal fears and fascinations with the unknown. However, without verifiable facts or robust evidence, it’s challenging to draw any meaningful conclusions. The video seems to thrive on the mystery, which can be captivating but also risks sensationalism.
      The lack of clarity in the outcomes of these cases leaves a sense of frustration. Could there be undisclosed investigations or theories that might lend context to these strange incidents? The creators of the video certainly imply a connection to extraterrestrial phenomena, yet the evidence remains elusive. I can't help but feel that while these narratives are intriguing, they lack the rigor of established investigations into UAPs or government disclosures, which typically rely on more substantial documentation or witness corroboration.
      As we engage with these stories, it raises an important question: how do we differentiate between genuine unexplained phenomena and stories that draw on sensationalism for entertainment? While the video presents compelling content, it also illustrates the need for critical thinking when approaching claims of alien encounters. Given the current climate of interest surrounding UAPs and government transparency, it’s essential to maintain a discerning perspective.
      What do you think? Are these cases worth investigating further, or do they serve primarily as entertainment? How do we balance curiosity with skepticism in such narratives?
    • By SpaceObserver
      The video titled 'Three Deaths Filed as Alien Encounters' dives into three chilling cases where individuals disappeared under mysterious circumstances, only to be found later with no clear explanations. The intriguing claims include a man who vanished for five days, reappearing with chemical burns and a cleaned appearance, and two television repairmen who reportedly climbed a hill with handwritten instructions, never to return. Each incident culminates with files that leave authorities stumped, marked by a lack of suspects or concrete answers.
      These cases evoke strong reactions, particularly in light of ongoing discussions around UAPs and their implications for national security. The scenarios presented in the video could potentially fall under the purview of government investigations, especially when considering the cultural context surrounding unexplained phenomena. As we look at these narratives, it's essential to ask how they fit within the broader framework of UAP disclosure and possible official acknowledgment of such events.
      One could argue that the lack of solid evidence or verification surrounding these deaths raises questions about the nature of the claims. While the video presents them as possible alien encounters, the absence of corroborating data challenges the narrative. The combination of sensational storytelling and the mysterious elements of these cases might detract from a more rational exploration of unexplained phenomena. The need for rigorous investigation and evidence remains crucial, especially when discussing potential extraterrestrial involvement.
      In this context, it’s worth noting how important the government's role is in addressing such incidents. If these cases indeed suggest an extraterrestrial connection, it could highlight gaps in current protocols for investigating unexplained events. As we consider the implications of these claims, one must also acknowledge the responsibility to discern fact from fiction, particularly when narratives are tied to public interest and fear.
      Audience reactions to the video reflect a mix of intrigue and skepticism. Some viewers express fascination with the mysterious elements, while others call for a more evidence-based approach to understand the events discussed. The varied responses underscore the tension between sensational narratives and the desire for scientific clarity, especially in discussions related to UAPs.
      Ultimately, the video raises a critical question: What should be the criteria for linking unexplained deaths to the possibility of alien encounters, and how can we ensure that investigations into such cases are thorough and transparent? This question not only pertains to the specific incidents highlighted in the video but also speaks to the broader implications of how society understands and reacts to the concept of UAPs and the unknown.
    • By MysteryFiles
      I recently stumbled upon a thought-provoking YouTube video titled 'Three Deaths Filed as Alien Encounters,' which dives into some unusual claims regarding alleged extraterrestrial involvement in unexplained deaths. While it's easy to be skeptical about these narratives, the video does present some interesting points that merit further discussion. There's a tendency for dramatic claims to overshadow more nuanced investigations, but the intersections between unexplained phenomena and human experiences are worth examining more closely.
      One moment that stood out in the video was the mention of three specific incidents where the victims reportedly had strange markings or anomalies on their bodies. This raises questions about the nature of these encounters and whether there could be any truth to the assertion that they were somehow linked to alien interactions. The video goes on to detail the circumstances surrounding these deaths, but it's crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation. In many of these historical reports, the lack of concrete evidence often leads to speculation, so we need to tread carefully.
      The discussion also touches on how these cases have been handled by government agencies. What records exist? Have any formal investigations been conducted? The lack of transparency surrounding UAP incidents can leave the public feeling unsatisfied, especially when cases like these are mentioned in passing. If there are indeed declassified files or reports that relate to these deaths, it might help clarify the situation. A deeper dive into the AARO's findings and any related FOIA releases could shed light on whether these accounts have been taken seriously by officials.
      Additionally, the video hints at whistleblower testimony that suggests some governmental oversight or awareness of these incidents, suggesting more may be hidden in the shadows. If there are former military personnel or officials willing to share firsthand accounts, it could offer a different perspective from the typical media portrayal. I wonder how many of these individuals might feel compelled to come forward as more information is requested by the public.
      In light of these points, it's essential to critically analyze the claims made in the video while remaining open to the possibilities they present. Are there legitimate investigations that have been overlooked in the past? What standards of evidence are we holding these cases to, and do they align with what we expect from other unexplained phenomena? With the increasing interest in UAPs and the government's recent focus on transparency, it seems like the perfect time to revisit these unsettling stories.
      What are your thoughts on the claims made in this video? Do you think there's any merit to the idea that these deaths could be linked to alien encounters, or do you think they are more likely to have conventional explanations? Let’s dig into the evidence and see where it leads us.
    • By DisclosureWatch
      Proxima Centauri b has been a topic of interest for years due to its position in the habitable zone of its star. However, I can't help but wonder if we might be oversimplifying the conditions on this planet. The latest studies show that while it has the right distance from its star, there are so many other variables that impact habitability that we might not fully understand yet.
      For instance, the fact that Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf means it experiences stellar flares and intense radiation. How does this affect the planet's atmosphere, and can it sustain liquid water as previously thought? There have been suggestions that it might have a thick atmosphere that could shield life, but wouldn’t that depend heavily on its composition?
      The more we learn about exoplanets, the more it seems that habitability is a complex interplay of factors rather than a simple checklist. What do you all think about the potential for life on Proxima Centauri b? Can we really consider it a true candidate for extraterrestrial life, or are we getting ahead of ourselves?
      I’ve also been reading about the potential biosignatures we might look for in its atmosphere. If we could analyze it from a distance, what would be the most telling signs for us to focus on? Given the technological advances in telescopes, could we see meaningful data on Proxima Centauri b in the near future?
      It’s exciting to imagine the possibilities, but I wonder if there’s a collective tendency to jump on the exoplanet bandwagon without enough critical analysis of the actual environmental conditions. The excitement is understandable, but could it lead to overconfidence in our assumptions about where we might find life?
      I’m interested to hear your takes on this. Do you think Proxima Centauri b is still a viable candidate for habitability, or are there simply too many unknowns at this stage? What research areas should we be monitoring closely?
×
×
  • Create New...