Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since I was a kid I was always fascinated with Sasquatch a.k.a. Bigfoot. From the Patterson film to the pics of footprint casts, it was always interesting to wonder. I think what got me into it was this one time I went hiking with a friend and an adult friend of the family. We were in an update NY Adirondack forest and this one are looked a bit odd. There were broken branches everywhere but what really made it odd was that some of the branches 4"-6" in diameter, were screwed out of the trees, a bunch of them. What would do something like that? It wasn't until I was older and after seeing lots of "evidence" by others that I started to think...maybe.

Fast forward and a few years ago started so much made for tv shows, documentaries, and movies around Bigfoot. Finding BIgfoot was my favorite, but guess what...they never found Bigfoot and probably never will. Every place they went was "Squatchy" of course and the BFRO is always sooo...close to getting one, right? I have to ask, why with all the technology and phone cameras, are we not seeing something amazing by now?  Where is Bigfoot?

So...now I come to the reason I started the topic and something someone once told me, "Bigfoot is an alien".

Well, lets think about it, we can never find him/her, they smell funky, and they are all over the word...they are either invisible or have some sort of out of this world cloaking ability. Maybe they bounce in and out of some sort of multi-dimensional portal? Its getting a bit farfetched here...but is it possible?

I refer you to this article from 2015 -

Is Bigfoot an extraterrestrial visitor? Some researchers think so

LEOMINSTER - Is it possible the creature known as Bigfoot, Sasquatch or by a number of different names all over the world is an inter-dimensional traveler? That's a theory now in play with both Bigfoot and UFO researchers, and one that played heavily into discussions at this weekend's Greater New England UFO Conference held in Leominster.

Paranormal researcher William Hall, at the convention ostensibly to talk ghosts, said the paranormal world as a whole is more connected than people realize. But that is beginning to change, at least from the perspective of those involved in ground level research.

Hall, who began his paranormal researcher with UFOs and aliens, said many of the classic signs from human encounters with otherworldly beings - ghosts, aliens and Bigfoot - have similar signs, be they disappearing beings, fast moving object or strange lights. As a result, many are starting to think of the the fields holistically, he said.

"It used to be that the UFO people didn't talk to the ghost people because they were a little weird, and nobody would talk to the Bigfoot people because they were crazy," Hall said. "I found out, we cannot continue to do that. In reality, quantum physics is leading us there."

If the alien theory is true, it solves one of cryptozoology's biggest unanswered questions: If Bigfoot is real, where are the bodies? Where are the animal carcasses left behind?

What do you think?

Here's an interesting but long film about this theory:

 

  • 5 years later...
Posted (edited)

Just waiting for one of these governemnt files to tell us it's so! 

For decades, Bigfoot has been one of the most fascinating mysteries in North America. Described as a massive, hairy, human-like creature roaming remote forests, Bigfoot—also known as Sasquatch—has inspired countless sightings, documentaries, books, and debates. But one question continues to spark controversy among researchers and enthusiasts.

Most Bigfoot believers view the creature as an undiscovered primate or relic hominid species living in remote wilderness areas. Reports typically describe a large, bipedal creature standing 7–10 feet tall and covered in dark hair. Despite thousands of reported sightings, no conclusive scientific evidence has been found to confirm the existence of Bigfoot.

The idea that Bigfoot could be extraterrestrial emerged when some witnesses began reporting UFO sightings near the same locations and times as Bigfoot encounters. Over the years, stories surfaced describing:

  • Bright unexplained lights in the woods
  • UFOs appearing before or after Bigfoot sightings
  • Bigfoot suddenly disappearing without a trace
  • Reports of telepathic communication
  • Claims of Bigfoot entering or exiting UFOs

These unusual reports led some researchers to speculate that Bigfoot may not be a flesh-and-blood animal at all, but something connected to extraterrestrial intelligence or other unexplained phenomena.

The Interdimensional Bigfoot Theory

An even stranger idea suggests Bigfoot may be an interdimensional being rather than an alien from another planet. Supporters of this theory argue that the lack of physical evidence—bones, bodies, nests, or DNA—could be explained if Bigfoot is able to move between dimensions or realities. This theory is popular in some UFO and paranormal communities.

What Does Science Say?

From a scientific perspective, there is currently no verified evidence that Bigfoot exists, much less that it is extraterrestrial. Mainstream researchers generally attribute Bigfoot sightings to misidentifications, folklore, hoaxes, or natural explanations. Likewise, no credible evidence has established a connection between UFOs and Bigfoot.

Edited by SpaceJunkie

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By MysteryFiles
      The recent 2026 Total Solar Eclipse over Spain has sparked a fascinating intersection between our study of celestial events and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. While solar eclipses are well-documented astronomical phenomena that have captivated humans for centuries, this particular event opens a channel for broader discussions about what lies beyond our own terrestrial horizon. Historical cases of unexplained sightings during significant astronomical events—like the 1966 Westall UFO incident in Australia—raise interesting questions about whether these celestial occurrences coincide with increased alien activity or sightings. The eclipse offers a unique backdrop to reflect on such possibilities, serving as both a spectacle and a potential catalyst for extraterrestrial engagement.
      In the YouTube video covering the eclipse, viewers might notice stunning visuals of the moon perfectly obscuring the sun, casting an eerie twilight across the landscape. This brief interlude of darkness can often lead to unexpected behavior from both wildlife and perhaps even unidentified aerial phenomena. It’s during these moments of atmospheric change that people report unusual sightings—whether they be birds acting strangely or lights in the sky behaving in ways that defy explanation. The intrigue surrounding these observations invites us to consider whether eclipses, in their dramatic fashion, might also serve as a backdrop for first contact scenarios or unexplained encounters with alien species. Could there be a link between significant astronomical events and extraterrestrial behavior?
      Some might argue that the heightened excitement and collective gazing skyward during such events create an environment ripe for misinterpretation of natural phenomena. However, as we continue to explore the cosmos, the line between coincidence and evidence blurs. The eclipse serves as a reminder of our small place in the universe, prompting us to question the existence of life beyond Earth. With ongoing developments in exoplanet research and increasing interest in astrobiology, could this eclipse mark a pivotal moment in our quest for understanding alien life? The claims made in the video regarding public reactions and unique sightings during the eclipse are worth dissecting further. Are these moments just illusions or could they offer genuine insights into the nature of alien species?
      Moreover, the spectacle of a total solar eclipse invites a conversation about the types of worlds capable of harboring life. With exoplanets being discovered at an unprecedented rate, how do these celestial bodies compare to the conditions that allowed life to flourish on Earth? The eclipses serve as a reminder of our own planet's position within a vast universe teeming with potential habitable worlds. The curiosity surrounding these celestial events encourages us to ponder what life might exist elsewhere, especially in systems similar to ours. With the advent of more sophisticated telescopes and studies in astrobiology, we are closer than ever to answering the profound question: Are we alone in the universe?
      The 2026 Total Solar Eclipse might just be another astronomical occurrence, or it could be part of a larger narrative linking the cosmos to the idea of extraterrestrial life. The moments of awe it inspires can lead to deeper reflections on our understanding of the universe and our place within it. As we ponder the implications of this celestial event, it raises a question for us to consider: What do you think the significance of astronomical events like solar eclipses is in relation to our understanding of alien life? Are they mere coincidences, or could they provide glimpses into what we are yet to discover beyond our world?
    • By CosmicSignals
      I've been thinking a lot about the recent discussions around potential signals originating from Proxima Centauri b. With it being the closest known exoplanet in the habitable zone, it's intriguing to consider what kinds of signals we might actually be picking up and what they could mean for the existence of advanced life.
      The signals detected so far seem to have characteristics that set them apart from usual cosmic background noise. Some experts are cautiously optimistic, suggesting that these could be technosignatures, possibly from an intelligent civilization. However, others argue that we should be careful not to jump to conclusions without more concrete evidence.
      What if these signals are not just random cosmic events? Proxima Centauri b has features that suggest it could support liquid water, which is a crucial ingredient for life as we know it. If we assume that life exists there, the possibility of discovering their form of communication is exciting yet daunting.
      We’ve been using radio telescopes for decades to search for signs of life, but the idea of listening for technosignatures from our closest neighbor raises a lot of questions. Are we prepared to deal with the implications of making contact if it turns out that these signals are indeed artificial? Or would we simply classify them as noise due to an overzealous interpretation?
      As the data comes in, it seems vital to approach these findings with a mix of skepticism and curiosity. Could this be the initial spark of a long-awaited breakthrough in our understanding of extraterrestrial intelligence? It might be too early to say, but it’s certainly exciting to consider the potential avenues this could open up in our search for life beyond Earth.
      I’m curious about what others think about this. Are the signals we’re observing just coincidental, or do you think we might actually be on the cusp of discovering something significant? What are the next steps we should take in following up on these signals to ensure we’re not missing out on a potential first contact scenario?
    • By SpaceObserver
      With the recent updates on the Starship lunar test flight, it feels like we're on the brink of some serious advancements in lunar exploration. I can't help but wonder how this test will impact the overall Artemis program and its timeline. The idea that SpaceX could potentially play a central role in returning humans to the Moon is thrilling.
      It's interesting to compare this test flight with previous lunar missions. For instance, Apollo missions relied on Saturn V rockets, which had their own engineering marvels. But now, we have reusable rockets and the capabilities of Starship that could fundamentally change how we approach lunar landings and resupply missions. Does anyone else feel like we’re witnessing a paradigm shift in space exploration?
      The partnership between NASA and SpaceX seems to be evolving rapidly. With Starship aiming to land on the Moon, I'm curious about how NASA's requirements have influenced the design and function of the spacecraft. Are there specific features added to Starship that you think will be essential for lunar operations?
      I've been following the tests closely, and the progress has been impressive. SpaceX's iterative approach to development seems to be paying off. Each test gives them more data to refine the system, and I can’t help but think how critical this is for the safety and success of future Artemis missions. What challenges do you think they might face in the upcoming flights?
      Moreover, the implications for Mars missions are equally exciting. If SpaceX can demonstrate successful lunar capabilities with Starship, I can see this as a stepping stone for the more ambitious plans of sending humans to Mars. But achieving that will require perfecting not only the technology but also the mission architecture.
      At the end of the day, this isn’t just about a single flight; it’s about setting the stage for decades to come in space exploration. How do you all feel about the future of Starship and its potential impact on the Artemis missions? Is it fair to say that this could revolutionize our approach to space travel?
    • By MysteryFiles
      The recent images and data from the Mars rovers have stirred up some intriguing conversations about the possibility of ancient microbial life on the Red Planet. One detail that stood out to me was the discovery of specific sedimentary structures that look strikingly similar to microbial mats found in some of Earth's oldest geological formations. It's as if Mars is echoing our planet's distant past in a way that can't be easily dismissed.
      Thinking back to the findings from Curiosity and Perseverance, we know that these rovers have been meticulously analyzing the Martian soil and rock samples. The presence of certain organic compounds combined with these structural formations raises a lot of questions. Could these be the remnants of long-gone life forms, or are there alternative explanations we haven’t fully explored yet?
      I’ve also been considering the role of water in all this. Mars had a much wetter environment billions of years ago, which seems essential for any form of life as we know it. Some researchers are suggesting that the conditions may have been right for microbial life to thrive. It’s fascinating to think that we might be looking at signs of ancient life in environments that once bore rivers or lakes.
      Then there’s the skepticism angle. Some scientists argue that the structures we’re seeing could be purely chemical in nature and not biological at all. This makes sense, especially when we remember that Mars is full of surprises, and the line between abiotic and biotic processes can get blurry. How do we sift through the evidence without jumping to conclusions?
      What complicates things even further is the historical context. If we look back at how the scientific community reacted to the early discoveries of extremophiles on Earth, it was a game-changer for our understanding of what life can be. Maybe Mars has a similar story to tell, but it relies on us to decode its secrets appropriately.
      With all this in mind, I wonder how we should approach the next phase of exploration. Are there specific experiments or missions that you think should be prioritized to investigate these findings further? I really feel like we’re on the cusp of something significant, and it’s exciting to think about what the next round of data might reveal.
    • By MysteryFiles
      It seems like we’re seeing some pretty remarkable advancements in satellite technology lately, particularly regarding UAP detection. The recent reports indicate that new systems are being deployed that can enhance our capability to track unknown objects in orbit. I wonder how effective these new satellites will be in distinguishing between ordinary debris and potential unidentified aerial phenomena.
      With the growing number of satellites already in operation, it’s intriguing to think about how these new detection systems will integrate into existing frameworks. Will they be able to provide us with real-time data on UAP sightings? Or will there still be a significant lag in information processing, leaving us in the dark about what’s really out there?
      Historical cases like the Phoenix Lights or the Tic Tac incident might have been resolved much quicker with access to improved satellite monitoring. I can’t help but think about the potential for these technologies to uncover previously hidden patterns or even entirely new incidents. Have we seen any indications of this happening with past UAP encounters?
      Another angle worth discussing is the concept of space domain awareness. As we improve our ability to detect and track all objects in our vicinity, how might this reshape our understanding of not just UAP, but other near-Earth objects as well? It raises questions about how much we truly know about our orbital environment and what remains unexplored.
      Also, I’m curious if there are any specific missions or projects on the horizon that will leverage these advancements. For instance, are there ongoing government programs tailored to utilize this tech for more comprehensive UAP monitoring? It seems like the lines between defense, exploration, and scientific inquiry are becoming increasingly blurred.
      All this makes me wonder if we could eventually reach a point where UAP classifications rely on robust data from these new satellite systems. What do you all think? Are we close to a breakthrough in how we interpret the unknown in our skies?
×
×
  • Create New...