Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*boj03ecVD9VwQJ_ZFGJIMg.jpeg
Image of 3I/ATLAS, taken on November 26, 2026. (Credit: Julien de Winter)

The non-gravitational acceleration of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is routinely updated by Davide Farnoccia on NASA’s JPL Horizons website here. On October 30, 2025, the value of the radial acceleration component A1 — normalized at a heliocentric distance of the Earth-Sun separation (=1 au), was listed as 1.6x10^{-6} au per day squared. By November 24, the coefficient A1 was reduced by a factor of 4 to a value of 4x10^{-7} au per day squared.

At that time, I pointed out here that the minimum perijove distance of 3I/ATLAS during its encounter with Jupiter on March 16, 2026 is forecasted to be 53.445 (+/- 0.06) million kilometers, identical within one standard deviation to Jupiter’s Hill radius at the perijopve time, 53.502 million kilometers. Interior to that radius, Jupiter’s gravity dominates of the Sun’s tide. Any small satellite deposited outside this radius will be removed from Jupiter by the Sun’s gravity.

Surprised by the unexpected match between the perijove distance of 3I/ATLAS and the Hill radius of Jupiter on March 16, 2026, I emailed Davide my report here about this unlikely coincidence. There was no response to my email. However, within a couple of days the listed A1 on NASA’s JPL Horizons website here was revised downward by a factor of 6 to a value of 6.8x10^{-8} au per day squared, with a new model for the radial dependence of the non-gravitational acceleration. The new model uses an inverse square dependence on distance from the Sun: 1/r², as appropriate for the sublimation of carbon dioxide (CO2) ice interior to a heliocentric distance of 5 au. This new model replaces the steeper radial dependence associated with the previous model used by NASA’s JPL Horizons — suitable for the sublimation of water (H20) ice based on work by Brian Marsden and collaborators, as described here and here.

Given these revisions, the new JPL Horizons forecast for the perijove distance of 3I/ATLAS is now 53.587 (+/- 0.045) million kilometers, slightly outside the Hill radius on March 16, 2026. However, this forecast relies on a 1/r² model which uses past contributions from larger heliocentric distances to explain the measured deviation of 3I/ATLAS from its original gravitational path.

The new model of JPL Horizons is likely inadequate. There is strong evidence that 3I/ATLAS became brighter near perihelion than the smooth 1/r² model would predict. Correcting the radial dependence of the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS to accommodate this evidence is likely to bring the perijove distance back to agreement with the Hill radius value.

A steeper radial profile of the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS near perihelion than the 1/r² model is suggested by the evolution of the luminosity of 3I/ATLAS. Based on the image obtained by the Hubble Space Telescope on July 21, 2025 (and reported here), the luminosity is dominated by the coma and reflects the mass loss if the total amount of scattered sunlight is proportional to the coma mass. The luminosity evolution was reported in a new preprint here by Marshall Eubanks and collaborators. An earlier report by Qicheng Zhang and Karl Battams here suggested a steep luminosity profile of 1/r^{7.5} inside 2 au as 3I/ATLAS was making its way to the perihelion distance at 1.36 au on October 29, 2025. Adopting this steep radial dependence would change the expected perijove distance towards a closer agreement with Jupiter’s Hill radius.

The insistence of the Vatican on the Earth being at the center of the solar system did not change the orbit of the Earth around the Sun. For the same reason, the new model of JPL Horizons will not change the actual trajectory of 3I/ATLAS. We will know whether the perijove distance agrees with the Hill radius in the coming months thanks to data collected as 3I/ATLAS approaches its perijove on March 16, 2026. In particular, astrometric data from the spacecraft Juno, Juice or Psyche will be very useful for settling the issue.

Since 3I/ATLAS was hidden by the Sun from terrestrial telescopes during its perihelion passage — when it gained most of its non-gravitational acceleration, we might only have a tight constraint on the integrated drift of 3I/ATLAS from its gravitational path but not on its radial dependence close to perihelion.

If the rare coincidence between the perijove distance of 3I/ATLAS and the Hill radius will materialize, it might flag a technological signature. In that case, 3I/ATLAS could release technological devices as artificial satellites of Jupiter, potentially at Jupiter’s Lagrange points L1 and L2 on the Hill sphere — where orbital corrections and fuel requirements are minimal.

Within the diameter of Jupiter’s orbit around the Sun, the coincidence between the perijove distance and the Hill radius has a statistical likelihood smaller than 0.00004. In case the non-gravitational acceleration was needed to achieve this match, the rare coincidence will constitute the most remarkable anomaly of 3I/ATLAS so far in the list compiled here. The final verdict on this matter will eventually be posted on the JPL Horizons website, underlining the inescapable truth that science is always work in progress, not to be settled by the authority of NASA officials in press conferences.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By SpaceObserver
      I noticed there hasn't been much buzz lately about Blue Origin's New Glenn and its anticipated launch schedule. Given that it's supposed to play a significant role in the commercial spaceflight landscape, I wonder how everyone feels about the current timeline and any recent updates.
      With the ongoing developments and delays in the space industry, especially with the competition heating up, it seems crucial for Blue Origin to solidify its launch plans. There was talk of a few test flights this year, but those seem to have shifted. Have there been any announcements that I've missed?
      Looking back at the New Shepard program, Blue Origin has shown they can deliver on suborbital flights for space tourism. However, New Glenn is supposed to take things to a new level, especially with its capabilities for orbital missions. How do you think they are preparing for the transition from suborbital to orbital flight?
      Also, with SpaceX’s consistent launches and upcoming missions, do you think Blue Origin is feeling the pressure? The recent announcements about NASA's partnerships might give them a boost, but I wonder if they can keep pace with the likes of Starship and Falcon Heavy.
      I’m particularly interested in how New Glenn's reusable technology compares to what SpaceX offers. The reusability angle is a game changer for commercial spaceflight, and I’m curious how effective Blue Origin's approach will be. Could they rival SpaceX in that department?
      If anyone has seen recent updates or has insights about the New Glenn schedule, it would be great to share! What are your expectations for its first operational flights?
    • By MysteryFiles
      With all the excitement surrounding the space launch industry lately, I'm curious about the current status of Blue Origin's New Glenn. It seems like the project has been in development for quite a while now, and I'm wondering if there have been any recent updates or timelines shared by Blue Origin regarding its first launch.
      I remember when they announced the New Glenn would be a heavy-lift rocket aimed at competing with Falcon Heavy. But as we know, timelines in the space industry can shift dramatically. Has anyone come across news about test flights or any potential customer contracts that might hint at when we can expect to see it in action?
      Also, considering the advancements with their New Shepard missions, do you think Blue Origin is ready to handle the operational demands of a rocket like New Glenn? It's interesting to think about how that technology could enhance their commercial spaceflight offerings, especially in terms of reusability and cost efficiency.
      Lastly, I’ve seen some speculation about partnerships or collaborations with NASA or other entities for lunar missions. Do you think we might see New Glenn play a role in upcoming Artemis missions? It could be a significant step if they manage to secure that kind of involvement, especially given the focus on sustainable lunar exploration.
      Looking forward to hearing what everyone else has found or thinks about the direction Blue Origin could be heading with New Glenn. There’s certainly a lot at stake in the current landscape of space exploration, and I'm eager to see how they fit into it all.
    • By CosmicSignals
      With the recent focus on Starship's continued testing, I'm curious about what the latest updates are regarding its potential Mars missions. It seems like we're at a pivotal moment with the technology maturing rapidly, but how close are we really to sending humans to Mars? The last few tests have shown significant advancements, especially with the heat shield and engine performance, but I haven't seen much chatter about the timeline for actual crewed missions.
      NASA's Artemis missions are also advancing quickly, which makes me wonder how that will intersect with SpaceX's plans. Are they still planning to support NASA with lunar missions before pushing further out to Mars? It feels like there’s a lot of synergy there, especially with the Lunar Gateway coming into play.
      What are everyone's thoughts on the potential challenges still facing Starship? Reusability is a game changer, but ensuring that it can handle the long duration and harsh conditions of a Mars mission is another beast entirely. Plus, there’s the question of life support systems and how they’ll be integrated into the design.
      I also recall some excitement around the idea of in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) for producing fuel on Mars. Has there been any word on how SpaceX plans to approach that? If they could figure out a reliable way to produce methane on Mars, that would dramatically change the game for long-term colonization efforts.
      I'd love to hear if anyone has caught any recent leaks or statements from SpaceX that give insight into their roadmap. The anticipation for the first human mission to Mars is palpable, and it feels like we're on the brink of some exciting breakthroughs in the next couple of years. Are we still aiming for the mid-2030s?
      It's hard to keep up with everything that's happening, so any detailed updates or insider information would be appreciated! Maybe we can even speculate a bit on what the first crew on Mars might experience, considering how much we’ve learned from previous missions with rovers and landers.
    • By SpaceObserver
      The Artemis II mission is really starting to ramp up, and I can't help but feel a mix of excitement and curiosity about what’s coming next. With the recent tests on the SLS rocket and the Orion spacecraft, it seems like they are trying to address every possible scenario before launch. I wonder how many adjustments they’ve had to make based on previous missions and the feedback they’ve received from Artemis I.
      One detail that struck me was the inclusion of a crew for this mission. It's not just a test flight anymore; we’re actually sending astronauts around the Moon. That adds a whole new layer of complexity and caution to the mission. I’m especially curious about how they’re preparing the crew for the unique challenges of deep space travel. What kind of training do you think they are undergoing?
      From what I’ve read, the mission aims to demonstrate critical technologies for future lunar landings. I’m keen to see how this mission will set the stage for Artemis III and the goal of a sustainable human presence on the Moon. It’s fascinating to think about how this could eventually lead to Mars exploration as well. Do you think we’ll see a direct link in the technology developed for Artemis II that will be applicable to Mars missions?
      Also, I’ve been following the public's reaction to the Artemis program, and it seems to be a mixed bag. While many are excited about returning to the Moon, others are questioning the costs and priorities of NASA. How do you feel about the investment being made in the Artemis missions compared to other scientific endeavors, like the James Webb Telescope and its discoveries?
      Overall, I’m looking forward to seeing the actual launch date and what surprises NASA may have in store. I keep checking the updates, hoping for some exciting news. Are there any specific aspects of the Artemis II mission that you’re particularly interested in, or any predictions on what might go wrong or right during the launch?
    • By SpaceObserver
      With the Mars Sample Return Mission gaining momentum, I can't help but feel excited about the potential discoveries that lie ahead. The mission aims not only to collect samples from the Martian surface but also to bring them back to Earth for thorough analysis. It’s interesting to think about how this could reshape our understanding of the planet's geology and any past life forms.
      When I look back at the Apollo missions, it feels like we’re on the brink of a similar leap in our exploration of Mars. Those lunar samples gave us a wealth of information, and the same could be true for Martian samples. What types of findings do you think we might uncover? Could there be evidence of ancient microbial life, or perhaps some unexpected mineral compositions?
      I was reading about the challenges the ESA faces with this mission, especially when it comes to ensuring the samples are not contaminated during collection or transport. It really highlights how complex these interplanetary missions are. It makes me wonder what kind of protocols are in place to safeguard these samples and maintain their integrity.
      Also, the collaboration between ESA and NASA adds an exciting layer to this mission. The transfer of knowledge and technology between these agencies could lead to significant advancements not just for Mars, but for future exploration of other celestial bodies as well. Have we seen any specific technologies being developed for this mission that might be groundbreaking?
      One of the recent updates mentioned the use of a new rover design. I'm curious about its capabilities and how it differs from previous rovers like Perseverance. Will it have improved autonomy or perhaps enhanced scientific instruments that allow for a more in-depth analysis of the terrain?
      I think the excitement around this mission speaks to our broader fascination with Mars. As we continue to learn more about its past, I wonder how our understanding might influence the search for life elsewhere in the universe. The connection between Mars and the potential for life on exoplanets is something I'd love to explore further. Could our findings from Mars provide clues about habitability on other worlds?
      Overall, I feel like we’re standing at the edge of something monumental with the Mars Sample Return Mission. The blend of technology, science, and international collaboration makes it a thrilling time for space enthusiasts. What are your predictions or hopes for this mission as we move closer to its launch?
×
×
  • Create New...