Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*Ih0Ybc6aAGC8OZUqU9nz1g.jpeg
(Image credit: Cosmin4000/Getty Images)

In the long tradition of scientific wagers, Skeptic magazine publisher and historian of science Dr. Michael Shermer has issued a $1000 bet that…

Discovery or disclosure of alien visitation to Earth in the form of UFOs, UAPs, or any other technological artifact or alien biological form, as confirmed by major scientific institutions and government agencies, will not happen by December 31, 02030.

Taking him up on that challenge is Harvard astronomer and Director of the Galileo Project Dr. Avi Loeb. The wager is placed through the Long Now Foundation’s Long Bets program (“an arena for competitive, accountable predictions”), which adds a 0 at the front of all dates on a 10,000 year calendar (“to foster better long-term thinking”), in keeping with their Clock of the Long Now, being built in Texas and designed to tick for 10,000 years. Details of the Shermer-Loeb wager may be found here.

Whoever wins, the $1000 stakes will be donated to the Galileo Project Foundation. Here are the terms for deciding who wins:

By Dec 31st 02030, at least two of these three scientific organizations — NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the American Astronomical Society — will affirm that discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence in the form of UAPs, UFOs, or any other interstellar objects that are determined to be ETI technological in nature, or any alien biological life form found here on Earth, has been made.

Here is Dr. Loeb’s argument:

The search for technological artifacts has just started in earnest in 2025 with the discovery of the anomalous interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, the launch of the Rubin Observatory and the construction of three Galileo Project Observatories. Given that there are billions of Earth-Sun analogs in the Milky-Way galaxy — most of which are billions of years older than the solar system, and that it will take less than a billion years for our Voyager spacecraft to cross the Milky-Way disk, we must engage in the scientific search for extraterrestrial technological artifacts. It is better to be an optimist because life is sometimes a self-fulfilling prophecy. This is why I am engaged in the search with the hope that we will find a partner on our blind date with interstellar objects.

Here is Dr. Shermer’s argument:

Since the founding of the Skeptics Society and Skeptic magazine in 1992, I have been documenting predictions by UFOlogists that discovery or disclosure of alien visitation to Earth is coming any day now. Believers appear in the media boldly predicting that by the end of the year we will have proof of alien contact — 33 years later I’m still waiting for said proof. More recently, proponents of UAPs as alien spacecraft have appeared before the U.S. Congress, confidently claiming that they know people who have seen and even touched aliens and/or their spaceships, back-engineered their technologies, and even communicated with the aliens. Yet when pushed for evidence, they always demur, saying that it’s “classified”, “top-secret”, that Men-in-Black threatened them into silence, that their careers and even their lives are at stake if they disclose said evidence, that they could only reveal the evidence in a “SCIF” (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) but not in Congress, and that many people in the U.S. government, CIA, FBI, NSA, etc. (never named) have this information and evidence of alien visitation. The purpose of this bet, in keeping with the rules of Long Bets and the philosophy of the Long Now Foundation, is to reveal the actual confidence of UFO/UAP alien believers by getting them to put their money where their beliefs appear to be. You say we will have alien disclosure by the end of the year? O-kay, let’s place a wager on that prediction. I say it won’t happen.

The Long Bets program was started in 2003 by Stewart Brand and Kevin Kelly, and is part of a long tradition of scientific wagers dating back at least to 1870 when Alfred Russel Wallace, co-discoverer with Charles Darwin of natural selection, accepted a £500 wager (a workingman’s wages for one year) placed by flat-Earther John Hampden that scientists could not prove that the Earth is round. Wallace proved it by demonstrating same-height poles placed at even intervals along a six-mile stretch of the Old Bedford Canal (north of London) appeared through a telescope lower by the exact “amount calculated from the known dimensions of the earth.” Unfortunately, Wallace had to take Hampden to court to collect his winnings. Thus, it is important that such wagers be professionally adjudicated by neutral referees. Other wagers include:

· In 1975, cosmologist Kip Thorne bet cosmologist Stephen Hawking that Cygnus X-1 was a black hole. Thorne won.

· In 1980, biologist Paul Ehrlich bet economist Julian Simon that the price of a portfolio of five mineral commodities (copper, chromium, nickel, tin, and tungsten) would rise in price over the next decade. Simon won.

· In 1998, neuroscientist Christof Koch bet philosopher David Chalmers that the Hard Problem of Consciousness (a term coined by Chalmers) would be solved in 25 years. Chalmers won.

· In 2017, astronomer Martin Rees bet psychologist Steven Pinker that “a bioterror or bioerror will lead to one million casualties in a single event within a six-month period starting no later than December 31, 02020.” Since the lab-leak hypothesis for Covid-19 (bioerror) was never proven, Pinker was declared the winner on the Long Bets platform.

If Loeb wins the bet, it will represent what would arguably be the greatest discovery in human history, namely that we are not alone in the universe. If Shermer wins the bet, it does not mean that we are the only intelligence in the cosmos, only that claims of contact are likely greatly exaggerated and that we need to keep searching for the truth about extraterrestrial intelligence.

A couple of weeks ago, the accomplished sculptor Greg Wyatt gave Loeb a foundation to create an original bronze sculpture, which Loeb labeled in advance: “The Alien.” Loeb plans to create the image of an extraterrestrial being with a body better than the human body, including additional eyes — enabling vision in all directions, additional legs — enabling better mobility, additional wings and fins — enabling motion in fluids and gases, and most importantly — a larger brain empowered by AI. Time will tell if Loeb’s vision is manifested in the cosmos.

ABOUT THE POSTING AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By MysteryFiles
      As many of you know, the search for extraterrestrial life has been a fascinating journey for scientists and enthusiasts alike. Just recently, NASA released significant findings regarding the conditions necessary for life beyond Earth, as detailed in their astrobiology section (you can read more at https://science.nasa.gov/astrobiology/). This discovery has drawn comparisons to the earlier Viking missions in the 1970s, which sought to determine if life existed on Mars. While those missions returned inconclusive results, the advancements in our understanding of extremophiles—organisms that thrive in extreme conditions—have shifted the narrative towards a more optimistic view of life in the universe.
      The recent focus on exoplanets and their habitability opens up a realm of possibilities. NASA's findings suggest that life could potentially exist in environments previously deemed inhospitable. This could lead us back to the question posed during the Viking missions: What constitutes life, and where might it be found? Are we on the cusp of finally answering that question? The idea that Mars, Europa, or even exoplanets in other solar systems could harbor life is not merely science fiction; it is becoming increasingly plausible.
      However, despite these exciting developments, there is still much we don't know. The findings highlight the conditions necessary for life but do not confirm the presence of any life forms. This uncertainty invites speculation: Could our own solar system hold secrets that we've yet to uncover? What about the historical reports of UAPs near bodies of water—could they be tied to these astrobiological considerations? Some have theorized that UAP sightings over the ocean may suggest a hidden connection to extraterrestrial intelligence, perhaps utilizing our oceans as a resource or a base of operations. While such ideas may seem far-fetched, the possibility remains tantalizing.
      As we delve into these discussions, I encourage everyone to share their thoughts, theories, and any lesser-known incidents that may relate to this topic. For example, what do you think about the implications of NASA's findings for our understanding of UAPs? Could there be a connection between unidentified aerial phenomena and the search for life in extreme environments? How do you interpret the evidence we've gathered so far, and what do you think the future holds for humanity's quest for extraterrestrial life? Let's keep the conversation open and thoughtful, ensuring that skepticism is welcomed alongside speculation.
      I'm curious to hear if anyone has further insights or additional cases that align with these recent discoveries. Could the technological advancements of our time finally lead us to the answers we've been seeking for decades? Let’s discuss!
    • By DisclosureWatch
      I wanted to bring attention to a fascinating video titled 'The Ultimate Away Game: World Cup Fever on the ISS,' which showcases astronauts on the International Space Station engaging in football-related activities while discussing life beyond Earth. This lighthearted take on sports in space provides an interesting backdrop for broader conversations about what it means to look for life elsewhere in the universe. Given that we often associate significant scientific inquiries with serious tone, it's refreshing to see how cultural aspects like sports can intersect with scientific endeavors. However, it also raises questions about our priorities in space exploration and how we communicate the search for extraterrestrial life to the public.
      The video features astronauts talking about not only football but also their hopes for future missions and discoveries related to habitable worlds. While the main focus is on their experience and camaraderie up there, it also subtly hints at humanity's desire to connect with life beyond Earth. This connection may seem trivial at first glance, but it can serve as an engaging entry point for discussions about the importance of astrobiology and our ongoing quest to find intelligent life in the cosmos. By presenting space exploration through a familiar lens, we might encourage more public interest and support for scientific endeavors, including those related to SETI and the search for exoplanets.
      Moreover, the juxtaposition of sports and space highlights the importance of teamwork and collaboration, not just among astronauts but also between nations when it comes to the search for alien life. As we approach a time when questions surrounding the existence of extraterrestrial species are becoming more mainstream, it is crucial to foster dialogue on how we might work together, in both the scientific and cultural realms, to address these profound questions. Could the way we communicate our findings about possible alien life be as important as the findings themselves?
      Another intriguing angle presented in the video is the notion of how astronauts might encounter life forms in their future missions to other celestial bodies. While the focus remains on their current experience, it acts as a reminder that we are on the cusp of potentially groundbreaking discoveries regarding extraterrestrial biology. The excitement around the World Cup parallels the excitement we feel as we look forward to new missions to Mars, Europa, and beyond. This makes me wonder how we can further integrate such relatable topics into the scientific discourse around astrobiology. Are there ways we can make the search for life more engaging and accessible to the general public?
      I found that the moments where the astronauts reflect on their experiences and their thoughts about life beyond Earth can inspire deeper discussions about the likelihood of encountering alien species in our lifetime. As we consider the vastness of the universe and the billions of potentially habitable exoplanets waiting to be explored, are we prepared for the implications of making contact? The World Cup metaphor signifies a gathering of nations, which also resonates with the idea of a collective human effort in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. As we become more aware of our place in the universe, how might our global perspective shift in terms of cooperation in scientific endeavors?
      Ultimately, this video seems to be more than just a whimsical look at life on the ISS; it invites us to reflect on our role as explorers and the possibilities that lie ahead. As we continue to navigate this exciting era of space exploration, it's vital to keep the conversation going. How do you think cultural events like sports can be leveraged to foster interest and understanding in the scientific community's search for alien life? What other unique perspectives can we bring to the table in discussions about extraterrestrial life and astrobiology?
    • By DisclosureWatch
      The recent YouTube video titled 'Extraterrestrial being or national security risk?' raises intriguing questions about the potential existence of alien life and the implications of such entities on national security. Videos like these often spark intense debates, but this particular one feels different due to the serious and methodical approach taken by the creator. The discussion navigates through various claims regarding encounters with unidentified entities, echoing sentiments we’ve encountered in official hearings and reports from bodies like the AARO.
      One of the key moments in the video is when the presenter discusses a few notable accounts of alleged sightings and interactions between military personnel and unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). While the video does not delve deeply into specific documents or official testimonies, it frames these encounters within the broader context of the ongoing discourse surrounding extraterrestrial life. It brings into question how much of our understanding of these phenomena is shaped by the lens of national security, rather than a purely scientific inquiry into potential alien existence.
      The creator highlights a range of opinions among experts, some advocating for a rigorous scientific investigation into these claims, while others express skepticism, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence. This dichotomy reflects a significant theme in the current narrative surrounding UAP and extraterrestrial life—how do we balance curiosity about potential alien species with the responsibilities of national security? This question is particularly relevant in light of recent hearings where lawmakers have sought clarity on UAP encounters, pushing for transparency in what the government knows.
      Furthermore, the video touches upon the role of organizations like SETI in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and how their scientific methods contrast with anecdotal evidence from military encounters. This contrast raises important discussions about the methodologies we should employ in our quest for understanding alien life. Should we prioritize scientific rigor or remain open to the more speculative narratives that often capture the public's imagination?
      As the conversation around this video expands, it prompts us to consider the implications of these claims on both a scientific and societal level. How should we approach the evidence that suggests the existence of extraterrestrial life? Is it time to reassess our frameworks for understanding encounters with unidentified phenomena? With the ongoing developments in the field of astrobiology and the increasing number of exoplanets being discovered, the question of alien life becomes ever more pressing. In light of these discussions, what are your thoughts on the claims made in this video? Do you believe they warrant further investigation, or should we remain skeptical until more concrete evidence is presented?
    • By CosmicSignals
      With the recent release of the video 'Introducing Artemis III,' I've found myself pondering the broader implications of NASA's lunar missions for our search for extraterrestrial life. The Artemis program aims not only to return humans to the Moon but also to establish a sustainable presence that may eventually lead to missions to Mars and beyond. In the video, the focus on advanced technology and collaborative international efforts caught my attention. Could this new phase of exploration enhance our capabilities in detecting technosignatures and biosignatures?
      One moment that particularly resonated with me was the mention of new instruments designed to analyze lunar regolith. This raises a fascinating question: what if the Moon holds clues to the early solar system or even evidence of past or present microbial life? While we often think of Mars in the hunt for life, could the Moon surprise us in this regard? As we develop more sophisticated tools, it's crucial to consider how they might also apply to astrobiology and SETI, especially in examining samples from other celestial bodies.
      Another point of interest is the emphasis on international collaboration in the Artemis program. This could lead to a broader sharing of data and findings, creating a more unified approach to searching for signs of alien civilizations. If countries around the world pool their resources and knowledge, could this accelerate our understanding of where to look and what signals to monitor? The video suggests that Artemis III will not only be a stepping stone for human exploration but also a catalyst for scientific discovery that transcends borders.
      I also wonder about the technological innovations discussed in the video. With advancements in communication and data analysis, we might be closer than ever to detecting technosignatures or unusual radio signals. This aligns with the ongoing efforts of SETI to listen for messages from intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations. Are the tools being developed for Artemis III opening new avenues for this type of research? The potential for cross-disciplinary applications in astrobiology and SETI could lead to breakthroughs we’re only beginning to imagine.
      As we move forward with the Artemis missions, I am left with a thought-provoking question: How might the discoveries made on the Moon inform our search for alien life, and what specific technologies or methodologies could we adopt to enhance this search both on the lunar surface and beyond? I look forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts on this and any insights you glean from the video!
    • By UAPResearcher
      I've been diving into the recent discoveries related to Enceladus and Europa, and I'm fascinated by what these ocean worlds could mean for the search for life beyond Earth. Both moons have subsurface oceans beneath their icy crusts, and recent missions have provided compelling data about their potential habitability. The plumes observed on Enceladus, for example, contain organic molecules and hints of hydrothermal activity, which are essential ingredients for life as we understand it.
      The Cassini mission's findings on Enceladus are particularly intriguing. During flybys, the spacecraft detected water vapor and ice particles ejected from the moon, suggesting a dynamic ocean beneath the surface. This raises questions about the possibility of life surviving in these environments. What are the implications if microbial life exists in these subsurface oceans? Could they be similar to extremophiles on Earth that thrive in extreme conditions?
      Europa presents its own set of mysteries. The Hubble Space Telescope has detected what may be water vapor plumes above its surface. If these plumes are indeed connected to the subsurface ocean, they might allow for future missions to sample the water and search for signs of life without having to drill down through the icy crust. The upcoming Europa Clipper mission is expected to gather more data on its habitability, and I'm eager to see what it uncovers.
      One aspect I've been considering is the potential for communication or contact with life forms in these ocean worlds. If life exists there, what form could it take? Would it be similar to Earth's marine life, or could it be something entirely different, perhaps adapted to the unique conditions of an icy ocean? The complexities of these environments could lead to diverse biological systems.
      It's also worth discussing the role of astrobiology in understanding these ocean worlds. The presence of hydrothermal vents, as seen on Earth, could provide the necessary energy and nutrients for life. The conditions in these environments are so varied that they could support multiple forms of life, not just microbial entities. What types of life do you think could evolve in such extreme environments?
      Given the scientific advancements in this area, I wonder how our understanding of life’s potential in the universe will change in the coming years. As we gather more data from missions like Cassini and the upcoming Europa Clipper, it will be interesting to see how we refine our theories about life beyond Earth. Do you think we'll find definitive evidence of life in these ocean worlds soon?
      I'm eager to hear your thoughts on all this. What specific discoveries about Enceladus and Europa have caught your attention? How do you think these findings shape the broader search for extraterrestrial life?
×
×
  • Create New...