Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
A strange sky phenomenon what is referred to as a "Second Sun" has been filmed again. This time, on 30 December 2022 a second sun has been seen in the sky above Dubai. 

second%20sun%20Dubai.jpg
Second Sun Dubai

The "second sun" phenomenon is real, and is certainly not a lens flare, camera artifact or optical illusion. There is no doubt that NASA and all other space organizations are aware of this second sun, which is mostly invisible, but they continue to cover it up. 

Is the ‘second sun’ an artificially created sun? NASA has an ‘artificial sun’ patent since the 1950’s. According to NASA it is just used for testing equipment and running simulations like optical reflection, space environment simulation, sunlight, reflectors and virtual properties. The 1960’s NASA sun simulator, nickname ‘Star’ was for an environment test chamber right here on earth, to simulate the sun found in space. 

Much research has been done into this phenomenon and the link is often made to the infamous Planet X, Planet Nine or even to Marduk's star Nibiru. 

second%20sun%20slovakia.jpg
Second Sun Slovakia

1. A study done by Dr. Avi Loeb, Professor of Science at Harvard and Harvard undergraduate student Amir Siraj goes against the dominate “lone star” thinking about the Sun’s origin. Their radical-sounding theory that the Solar System may have once been a binary star system - so consisting of two stars orbiting a common point in space - perhaps shouldn’t come as a surprise. 

2. The concept of a "second sun" is often used to refer to a large unknown planetary object or an advanced unknown planet like Nibiru which is mentioned in history books. 

Nibiru is a term in the Akkadian language, translating to "crossing" or "point of transition.” 

Nibiru is Marduk's star. Marduk as the ruler of the cosmos made Nibiru visible and set it on his course wherein Nibiru passes by earth every 3,600 years allowing allows its sentient inhabitants to interact with humanity as defined in tablet 5 of the creation epic Enûma Eliš and described on a complete cuneiform tablet. 

second%20sun%20indonesie.jpg
Second Sun Indonesia

3. A respected person who believes that Nibiru exists is Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, U.C.L.A.). Below are a number of quotes where he refers to the origin of Nibiru, where it is, when Nibiru will arrive and how it will affect us  

10,900 B.C. Uranus drifted away from the Sun and sped Nibiru toward Earth sooner than 3,600 years. 

From 10,000 BCE. on, Uranus speeded Nibiru’s orbit to 3450 Earth years rather than 3600. 

Nibiru has an orbit that looks like an infinity symbol. Every second time around this sidewise, Nibiru will cause earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions and possibly a pole shift. 

If the information from the Ilat-Litum Tablets that a Nazi expedition in 1939 found in Antarctica is correct, many people will die because of this. 

The Ilat-Litum Tablets explain Nibiru’s sidewise-8 orbit thus: “the point of crossing lies on one level but not at the same point in space. One time the encounter in (the zodiacal house of) Aquarius causes Earth’s orbit to shift, but the other time it orbits the asteroid belt without disrupting Earth. 

Nibiru returned to perigee in 7450, 4000, and 556 B.C. and next returns to the inner solar system in 2900 BCE. Though the debris 180 degrees from Nibiru on Nibiru’s orbital path, its far LaGrange point moving in harmonic procession always opposite Nibiru, may be upon us now! 

Maybe Baba Vanga's predictions for 2023 will come true? A big astronomical event will occur as Earth's orbit will change. As a result of this event, it could have catastrophic consequences on Earth and the Earth will be hit by an unprecedented solar storm on a scale the world has never before seen.

Two Suns in Dubai👌 pic.twitter.com/dbDZe3RgCc

— nikola 3 (@ronin19217435) December 29, 2022

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By UAPResearcher
      The latest video from Cosmic Road raises an intriguing point about a supposed giant UFO spotted on the Sun, among other topics related to UAPs. While the video compiles various sightings and updates, the specific focus on a solar anomaly certainly catches the eye. What makes this particularly interesting is the lack of detailed evidence provided regarding the claim about the giant UFO and how it was identified.
      In the realm of solar observations, anomalies like this often spark debate. Historically, many interpretations of solar phenomena have turned out to be misidentified space debris, camera artifacts, or even plasma interactions. Without further evidence or credible sources to substantiate the claim of a giant UFO on the Sun, it remains a point of interest rather than a confirmed case.
      The video’s content also delves into other UAP sightings, which may provide context for how the community is currently interpreting these phenomena. It’s essential to differentiate between genuine, well-documented sightings and those that primarily serve to engage an audience without rigorous verification. The video does not seem to provide any new official reports or disclosures, which limits its value for those seeking concrete information.
      Viewer reactions in the comments indicate a mix of skepticism and intrigue, highlighting the ongoing interest in UAP phenomena, while also expressing caution about the claims made. This reflects a broader trend in the UFO community, where videos can stir significant discussion, but the line between entertainment and credible investigation often blurs.
      Given the persistent fascination with both solar anomalies and UAPs, how do we balance our interest in these topics with the need for rigorous analysis and evidence? Can claims like the one made in this video lead to more substantial investigation, or do they detract from the serious study of UAPs? It would be interesting to see if any follow-up discussions arise that provide greater clarity on this topic.
    • By UAPResearcher
      Imagine witnessing a peculiar object darting across the backdrop of our Earth, captured in real-time from the International Space Station (ISS). The recent high-definition live stream from NASA offers a stunning view of our planet but also raises intriguing questions about what might be seen beyond the ordinary. The video, streamed officially by NASA, showcases breathtaking vistas of Earth, but viewers have reported spotting unidentified flying objects (UFOs) that have fueled discussions in the UFO community. This brings to light the critical need for a closer examination of the data we can gather from such streams, especially regarding the potential presence of UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena).
      One particularly interesting aspect of the stream is its clarity and the perspective it offers. As the ISS orbits Earth at approximately 17,500 miles per hour, the opportunity to capture fleeting moments of anomalous activity presents a unique case for researchers. Observers have noted various shapes and movements that defy conventional explanations—some resembling the classic flying saucer shape while others appear more irregular. These observations, although anecdotal, align with historical accounts of sightings that often occur in similar contexts, such as during military operations where pilots reported seeing objects that could not be explained by conventional aviation technology.
      In considering these reported sightings, it's essential to approach them through the lens of evidence-based research. The live stream offers a continuous feed, meaning any claimed sightings can be cross-referenced with the ISS's trajectory and the time of the sighting. This raises important questions about the nature of these objects—are they atmospheric phenomena, advanced technology from Earth, or something else entirely? Witness accounts from military personnel and pilots often describe lights or objects performing maneuvers that exceed our current understanding of physics. The real-time nature of the ISS stream can potentially provide corroborative visual evidence that could align with such accounts.
      A specific moment that has caught the attention of viewers in this stream occurred during a transition from daylight to twilight as the ISS passed over a densely populated area. Observers noted a bright light moving erratically across the screen, prompting discussions about similar patterns seen in military engagement footage. This raises the question of whether the ISS could inadvertently capture objects of significance to UAP investigations. Given that the video offers an unfiltered perspective from space, it could serve as an invaluable resource for researchers attempting to analyze these phenomena systematically.
      Moreover, in the context of NASA's ongoing commitment to transparency regarding UAPs, this live stream serves as a platform for public engagement and scientific inquiry. It invites enthusiasts and skeptics alike to analyze the footage and contribute to the discourse around what these sightings might indicate about our understanding of aerial phenomena. As we dissect these moments, it's crucial to maintain a balanced approach, considering both the possibility of misinterpretation and the exciting prospect of genuine UAP encounters.
      As we delve into further analyses of this live stream, what do you think about the reliability of using such footage for UAP research? Could the high-definition views from the ISS provide meaningful data that might lead us to a clearer understanding of unidentified objects in our sky?
    • By AlienMan
      What We Learned From the Second Dump of UAP Government Files
      The recent release of additional UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) government records has once again sparked debate among UFO researchers, skeptics, and enthusiasts. While many people hoped for definitive proof of extraterrestrial visitation, the second major document release provides something equally valuable: a deeper look into how governments investigate unexplained aerial events.
      One of the most interesting findings from this latest document dump is the sheer number of reports that remain unresolved. Although many cases were eventually linked to conventional aircraft, atmospheric conditions, drones, or sensor anomalies, a significant number of incidents could not be conclusively identified based on the available data.
      Another key takeaway is the increasing reliance on advanced sensor technology. Many modern UAP reports involve multiple forms of detection, including radar systems, infrared cameras, satellite tracking, and eyewitness observations from trained military personnel. This differs significantly from older UFO reports that often relied solely on visual sightings.
      The documents also highlight how seriously some military organizations now treat UAP encounters. In several cases, pilots and military personnel were encouraged to report unusual aerial objects without fear of ridicule or professional consequences. This represents a major shift from previous decades when many witnesses were reluctant to come forward.
      Perhaps the most discussed aspect of the latest file release is what was not included. While the documents provide valuable insight into investigative procedures and incident reports, they do not offer conclusive evidence that any UAP is extraterrestrial in origin. This has led to continued speculation among both believers and skeptics.
      Some researchers argue that the lack of definitive explanations for certain cases suggests there may be technologies operating beyond current public understanding. Others maintain that unexplained does not automatically mean alien and that further investigation is necessary before drawing conclusions.
      Regardless of where you stand on the issue, the second UAP document release demonstrates that governments continue to take unidentified aerial phenomena seriously and that many questions remain unanswered.
      What was your biggest takeaway from the latest UAP file release? Did anything in the documents surprise you, or do you think the most important information is still being withheld from the public? Share your thoughts and theories below.
       
       
       
    • By SpaceJunkie
      From Fox News...

      Watch the latest video at foxnews.com The Pentagon has confirmed the authenticity of newly leaked video and images showing multiple UFO sightings by U.S. Navy personnel, as the government prepares to release a highly anticipated first-of-its-kind report on UFOs this summer.
      An 18-second video shows what is described as three pyramid-shaped UFOs hovering over the warship USS Russell at night in July of 2019 off the San Diego coast. At one point, the pyramid-shaped craft reportedly hovered 700 feet over the tail of the Russell.
      This is the first video the public has seen from the July 2019 incident in which mysterious UFOs described as unmanned aerial vehicles reportedly harassed at least three U.S. warships during military exercises over multiple days — at one point matching the speed and bearing of one destroyer for 90 minutes while performing "brazen" maneuvers.
      https://www.foxnews.com/us/ufos-spotted-navy-best-the-world-has-seen
    • By USH
      Richard Dolan reviews the Pentagon’s second pursue release, which he finds substantially stronger than the first. The release includes military infrared videos showing fast-moving spherical objects, unusual formations over water, a striking cigar-shaped object over Kabul, and multiple long-duration military tracking sequences. 

      Some cases may eventually have conventional explanations, but several raise serious questions that are not easily answered by vague references to “birds” or “drones.” 
      In this video, Richard examines the stronger clips, discusses what appears genuinely anomalous, and separates the more compelling cases from the weaker ones. 
      Even so, this second batch of UFO files still leaves many unanswered questions about whether these objects truly represent unidentified aerial or underwater phenomena. The path toward full disclosure remains a long one.
        View the full article
×
×
  • Create New...