Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
In the case of the TR-3B Black Manta, it means a craft that uses highly pressured mercury accelerated by nuclear energy, so that plasma is produced, which, in turn, creates a field of anti-gravity around the craft. It has an electromagnetic coil at the heart of it’s motive power system, the result of which is electromagnetic drive that interacts with the Higgs-Boson field at the quantum level. Heady stuff indeed! 

TR3b%2BBlack%2BManta.jpg

So, an anti-gravity aircraft doesn’t use conventional turbine or rocket engine technology, but instead a propulsion system that creates thrust by generating high-energy plasma. These aircraft are also referred to as ‘flux liners’. 

As with many divergent aviation technologies, anti-gravity technology dates back to the latter part and aftermath of World War II, and specifically the covert U.S. project known as Operation Paperclip. 

The objective of Operation Paperclip was for the U.S. to gain as much leverage against the Soviet Union in the military armaments technology race, which is why the project was packed to the rafters with German scientists who were avowed members of the Nazi Party. 

That means the U.S. has been investigating anti-gravity technology for nearly 70 years. 

It is the culmination of theories regarding gravitation, quantum gravity and general relativity, the latter as first put forward by Albert Einstein himself. 

Anti-gravity is of huge interest to the military and scientists alike, given that, for example, one could hypothetically reduce an aircraft’s mass by using electromagnetic propulsion, even down to zero. 

Little wonder that the likes of NASA, the U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin researchers have all invested in theoretical studies regarding the ability to alter inert mass. 

According to experts, the TR-3B Black Manta would use conventional thrusters located at the tips of the aircraft that would allow it to perform a dizzying number of rapid high-speed maneuvers, including perfect right-angle turns and hyper acceleration. And it could achieve this along all its three axes. 

Remember, the TR-3B was designed to be a subsonic stealth spy plane. 

For one thing, it’s a very silent aircraft, save for a slight humming sound. An interesting by-product of the plasma the TR-3B generates is that it significantly reduces the aircraft’s radar signature, thereby making it ideal for missions in which stealth is paramount. 

That means the TR-3B Black Manta could sneak into just about any air space of any country and not be detected by its air traffic control or air defence systems. 

This little black number has been associated with multiple reports of sightings of flying triangle aircraft over Antelope Valley, an area of desert in southern California much beloved by UFO watchers. 

It’s also this desert area of California that draws people interested in covert black project or ‘black ops aircraft projects, given its close proximity to several known military research and testing areas, including Edwards Air Force Base and USAF Plant 42, the latter which is a mere 60 miles or 97 kilometres from downtown Los Angeles. 

The TR-3B Black Manta would certainly be the type of black ops project typical of the U.S. Air Force and Navy. The U2 spy plane of the 1950s, the SR-71 jet of the 1980s, and the present-day F-117A stealth craft are just three examples of planes that the U.S. Air Force denied existed for years, all of which were first covertly developed at Nevada’s infamous Area 51 base. And don’t let’s forget that Area 51 itself was only finally acknowledged by the U.S. government when that most covert of agencies, the CIA, did so in June 2013, courtesy of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed eight years earlier. 

But does it exist? 

There are of course the inevitable allegations that the TR-3B was built by the military using extraterrestrial reverse-engineered technology. 

Even Forbes magazine mused in 2021 that maybe, just maybe the patents issued to Salvatore Cezar Pais could be a cover for alien technology captured over the years by the U.S. military. 

So, what of the TR-3B Black Manta? How far back does it go, if at all? Does it have anything to do with the aforementioned 2018 patent issued to Pais and the U.S. Navy? Is it a plane, is it a bird, could it even be Superman? No, it’s just the United States Air Force messing with our heads again.

 

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By SpaceObserver
      I just came across a fascinating video from NewsNation that compiles some recent UFO disclosure claims, including notable whistleblower testimonies and reports of black triangle sightings. One of the highlights discusses a piece of metal said to have been recovered by the Soviet Union, which has sparked quite a bit of debate on its origin and significance.
      The video presents several allegations from whistleblowers who claim to have inside knowledge about government investigations into UFOs. These testimonies often touch on the mysterious nature of black triangle sightings, which have been reported by both military personnel and civilians alike. Black triangles are often described as large, silent craft that glide through the sky, and they have been a topic of intrigue for decades. The claims surrounding them are often met with skepticism, yet they continue to draw attention, especially in light of recent government hearings.
      Another intriguing aspect mentioned in the video is the latest UFO file release, which is part of an ongoing effort by the government to be more transparent about its investigations. This aligns with the recent push for greater accountability within government agencies regarding UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) sightings and encounters. Many hope that as more information becomes available, it will help clarify some of the uncertainties surrounding these phenomena.
      The disputed metal piece from the Soviet era adds another layer of complexity. If indeed it has ties to extraterrestrial technology, it could potentially change our understanding of both history and current UAP phenomena. However, the lack of verifiable evidence surrounding this claim raises important questions about its authenticity and the motivations behind its disclosure. It seems like the more we dig, the more questions arise rather than answers.
      Overall, the video encourages viewers to consider the implications of these claims and the broader context of government transparency regarding UFOs. As someone interested in both space exploration and the potential for extraterrestrial life, I find the intersection of scientific inquiry and government investigation particularly compelling. It’s a reminder that while we seek answers about life beyond Earth, there are still many unresolved mysteries within our own skies.
      What do you think the government should focus on next regarding UAP investigations and disclosures? Are we ready for full transparency, or is there still too much at stake?
    • By MysteryFiles
      I recently came across a fascinating YouTube video titled 'Reality Check: Secret Soviet UFOs' that dives into some lesser-known incidents involving UFO sightings during the Cold War era. While the video presents some intriguing claims about KGB operations aimed at investigating UFOs, I found myself skeptical about certain aspects, particularly the idea that KGB agents would swarm suburban houses in pursuit of UFOs. It seems a bit far-fetched, doesn’t it?
      The video highlights several reported cases where Soviet citizens encountered unidentified flying objects, often leading to official investigations by the KGB. One moment that stood out to me was a description of a rural village where multiple residents reported seeing strange lights in the sky, followed by KGB personnel arriving to conduct interviews. While it’s clear that the Soviet government took these reports seriously, it raises questions about how much was genuinely unexplained and how much might have been a cover for other operations. What do we think about the credibility of these witnesses, especially given the political climate of the time?
      Interestingly, the video also discusses how the Soviet Union's approach to UFOs diverged from that of the United States, which fosters a deeper discussion about the cultural perceptions of aerial phenomena. With the Soviet focus on secrecy and surveillance, it makes one wonder if there were any cover-ups or misdirection at play in the reports. Were these UFO sightings indicative of advanced technology, or were they simply misidentified military craft? It feels like there are layers of complexity here that merit a closer look.
      Moreover, I can't help but think about how these historical incidents compare to modern-day UAP discussions. With recent government disclosures in various countries, including the U.S., about UAPs, it seems like the veil is slowly lifting. Could some of the incidents featured in the video be related to similar phenomena that are still not fully understood today? What does this mean for our understanding of both past and present UAP encounters?
      As we analyze these cases, I’m curious about your thoughts. Do you find the claims made in the video about the KGB's involvement compelling, or do you view them with skepticism? What do you think could be the motivations behind the Soviet government's interest in UFOs at that time? Let’s break down these intriguing incidents and see where they lead us in our quest for answers about unidentified aerial phenomena.
    • By CosmicSignals
      I recently came across a fascinating YouTube video titled 'UFO files: ‘Black triangles’ a highlight of latest release.' This video dives into some of the most compelling black triangle sightings documented in official files, and it reminds me of the infamous Phoenix Lights incident back in 1997, which also left many witnesses baffled by the sight of a massive, triangular craft silently gliding through the night sky. The black triangle phenomenon has been a topic of intrigue not only for UFO enthusiasts but also for those interested in the technological capabilities of potential extraterrestrial civilizations.
      The video reviews several recent disclosures, particularly emphasizing military encounters with these mysterious black triangles. The accounts of pilots describing their encounters with these crafts are particularly striking. They often report high-speed maneuvers and capabilities far beyond our known aviation technology. What stands out in this video is the presentation of radar data that seems to corroborate these eyewitness reports. Such data is crucial in validating the existence of these phenomena and could provide evidence of advanced technology not yet publicly understood, igniting discussions about what kind of civilization could potentially operate such vehicles.
      One claim that piqued my interest was the reference to the craft's silent operation, which has been a consistent detail in many of these sightings. The ability to move without producing sound poses intriguing questions about the propulsion systems that might be in use. This leads to a larger question of whether these technologies could be a product of extraterrestrial engineering or simply advanced human technology that is still classified. The video encourages viewers to consider the implications of these technologies on our understanding of physics and the potential for interstellar travel.
      As someone deeply interested in SETI and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, I find it crucial to explore the scientific possibilities that these sightings represent. If we are indeed witnessing advanced craft, what might this imply about the existence of other life forms in the universe? Could we be on the brink of understanding not just the technology behind these crafts, but also the civilizations that created them? The video leaves us pondering if we are approaching a pivotal moment in our search for biosignatures and technosignatures in the cosmos, and whether these sightings could be a precursor to more profound revelations.
      I'm curious to hear what everyone thinks about the implications of these recent disclosures. How do you interpret the black triangle sightings in the context of our ongoing search for extraterrestrial life? Do you believe these encounters suggest we are not alone in the universe? Let’s discuss the potential scientific breakthroughs and the mysteries that remain unsolved as we examine the evidence presented in the video.
    • By DisclosureWatch
      In the recent YouTube video 'The Secret History of America's UFO Legacy Program Explained,' the creator takes us through the intricate history of government involvement with UFOs, particularly focusing on the various programs that have emerged over the decades. What stands out to me is the framing of these programs not just as isolated incidents, but as a continuous legacy that reflects a growing acknowledgment of unidentified aerial phenomena. Given the recent momentum in UAP disclosure, this video provides a rich backdrop to evaluate how far we've come and what remains obscured.
      One interesting claim made in the video discusses the existence of classified documents from the 1980s that allegedly shed light on military encounters with UAPs. This leads us to wonder if any of these documents could be available through FOIA requests, especially given the current climate of increased transparency surrounding UFO-related matters. With Congress pushing for more accountability from the Pentagon and organizations like the AARO ramping up their efforts to provide clarity, it is vital to scrutinize these documents to see if they align with current UAP reports or contradict them.
      The video also touches on the testimonies from military pilots who have encountered UAPs during training exercises. Their accounts have gained significant attention, particularly during recent congressional hearings. It would be beneficial to compare the claims made by these pilots in the video with the official records released by the government. How do their descriptions of UAPs stack up against the radar data collected during these encounters? And what does it mean for the credibility of both the pilots and the U.S. military if these accounts can be substantiated?
      Furthermore, the video raises questions about whistleblower protections. As more individuals come forward with potentially explosive information regarding UAPs and government cover-ups, what mechanisms are in place to ensure their safety and encourage further disclosures? The AARO has stated its commitment to investigating all credible claims, but how effective is that commitment in practice? It would be interesting to bring in examples of past whistleblowers and assess what the outcomes were for them in light of their disclosures.
      This brings us to a crucial point: while the video emphasizes historical context, it also challenges us to consider the present and future of UAP disclosure. With ongoing congressional discussions and public interest surging, how do we ensure that the narrative around UAPs evolves from mere speculation to rigorous investigation? Are we truly on the verge of a new era where we can expect more substantial answers? This video opens the floor for deeper discussions about the trajectory of UAP investigation and what it means for our understanding of aerial phenomena. What do you think are the most significant steps we can take to push for accountability and clarity from government agencies regarding UAPs?
    • By CosmicSignals
      Many of you might have come across the intriguing video featuring Sean Stone, Oliver Stone's son, where he discusses the idea that the government is hiding antigravity technology related to UFOs. This topic touches on a critical aspect of the ongoing debates around UAPs and government transparency. Stone's perspective could provide a fresh angle on what we know—or what we think we know—about advanced propulsion systems purportedly linked to extraterrestrial technology. Given the recent uptick in military encounters and official reports on UAPs, it seems timely to unpack these claims further.
      In the video, Stone suggests that there is a considerable amount of suppressed knowledge regarding antigravity technology, hinting at a disconnect between what's publicly available and what the government understands about these phenomena. This brings to mind the discussions we've had in this forum about the Pentagon's recent reports and whistleblower accounts. Are we witnessing a genuine push toward disclosure, or are these narratives simply a distraction? It’s fascinating to consider the implications of such technology, not just for our understanding of UFO sightings, but also for potential advancements in space travel and exploration.
      One moment in the video that stands out is when Stone talks about the possibility of engineers and scientists having been aware of such technology for decades, yet kept it under wraps for various reasons. This echoes previous claims from military insiders who have spoken about encounters with UAPs exhibiting flight characteristics that defy our current understanding of aerodynamics and physics. The idea that there may be unacknowledged technology that could revolutionize our approach to space and exploration is both thrilling and unsettling. What would it mean for our scientific community, and how would it reshape our quest for technosignatures and signs of alien civilizations?
      Moreover, the intersection of Sean Stone’s claims with the ongoing congressional hearings about UAPs raises several questions. Are we at a critical juncture where the government may finally have to confront the disclosures? The mention of antigravity technology is significant because it suggests that some sightings could be explained by means that we are only beginning to comprehend. If such technology exists, could it provide insights into how civilizations beyond our own have achieved interstellar travel? Or is this merely speculative thinking fueled by our desire to understand the unknown?
      As we delve deeper into these claims, it's vital to remain grounded in what we can verify. The scientific community thrives on evidence, and as enthusiasts of SETI and astrobiology, we must advocate for rigorous investigations into any of these assertions. The potential for discovering new forms of propulsion and energy could change everything we know about space exploration. This brings me to a question for all of you: What do you think about the claims made in Sean Stone's video? Do you believe there is credible evidence of antigravity technology, or is this just another layer to the complex UFO narrative that we are still trying to decipher?
×
×
  • Create New...