Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*tW4zQa4keh9HxtB_so_vww.jpeg
Logarithm (base 10) of the abundances of carbon (vertical axis) and iron (horizontal axis) relative to their solar values (calibrated by hydrogen). The most metal-poor star known, SDSS J0715−7334, is shown as a large red star. It is deficient in both carbon and iron. (Image credit: A.P. Ji et al. 2026)

The first generation of stars formed out of pristine gas of hydrogen and helium, the primordial gas left over from the Big Bang; for details, see my textbooks titled “How Did the First Stars and Galaxies Form?” here and “The First Galaxies in the Universe” here. Nuclear fusion in the interiors of these stars created heavier elements leading all the way to the most stable nucleus in nature, iron. Since life-as-we-know-it relies on carbon and oxygen, our cosmic roots stem from the nuclear fusion reactions in the hot cores of these first stars.

The nuclear burning ultimately converted the initial fuel of early massive stars to heavy elements, with the most stable element, iron, in the middle, surrounded by “onion shells” of progressively lighter elements in the outer layers. The envelope of heavy elements was expelled to interstellar space through supernova explosions once the nuclear fuel was consumed and the core collapsed to the scale of a city — ejecting the outer envelope through the release of its acquired gravitational energy.

In a Nature paper (accessible here) that I co-authored in 2003 with my former postdoc, Volker Bromm, we explained that the first stars in the Universe should have been much more massive than the Sun. Inefficient cooling of the primordial gas through molecular hydrogen yielded fragmentation into clumps, each with at least a few hundred solar masses. But as soon as the primordial gas was enriched with heavy elements by supernova explosions to a carbon or oxygen abundance as small as ~0.01% of that found in the Sun, cooling by carbon or oxygen atoms could have led to the formation of low-mass stars by allowing fragmentation to smaller clumps.

The earliest supermassive stars of a few hundred solar masses were short lived, lasting only a few million years and leaving behind black holes. But stars with a mass comparable to that of the Sun may still be around today.

The atomic cooling by carbon and oxygen naturally accounts for the known population of solar-mass stars in the halo of the Milky-Way galaxy with extremely low iron abundances but with a modest carbon abundance. Such stars are deficient in iron and may therefore be regarded as `anemic’. But their substantial carbon content explains how atomic cooling led to their formation.

How did their unusual abundance pattern form? Carbon-enhanced, iron-deficient stars could have been enriched by a supernova explosion that ejected the outer layers of a dying star, including carbon, while draining most of the iron in its core into a black hole.

This week, a new Nature paper (accessible here) reported the discovery of the most metal-poor star known, SDSS J0715−7334. This cool, red-giant star with a surface temperature of 4,700 degrees Kelvin, shows an iron abundance which is 10^{−4.3} of the solar value and a carbon abundance that is 10^{−4.5} of the solar value. It is deficient in both iron and carbon.

Altogether, the heavy elements make up a tiny fraction, 7.8 × 10^{−7}, of the total mass of the star, requiring a formation channel mediated by cooling of dust particles, since atomic cooling is not sufficiently effective. The heavy element abundance pattern of the star can be explained by a primordial supernova explosion of a progenitor star with an initial mass of 30 solar masses. The orbit of the star implies that it originates from the halo of the Large Magellanic Cloud.

1*t8KnjtzyjajUGrnlVj_taA.jpeg
The orbit of the metal-poor star SDSS J0715−7334 over the past 4 billion years in Galactocentric coordinates on the sky, including the gravitational influence of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). (Image credit: A.P. Ji et al. 2026)

The star SDSS J0715−7334 is much more chemically pristine than the earliest galaxies discovered so far by the Webb telescope, with the record holder galaxy — reported here — found when the Universe was 280 million years old — merely 2% of its current age. When I started this field of research in the early 1990s, the earliest galaxies known were a few billion years old. The Webb telescope pushed the time horizon of known galaxies by a factor of ten closer to the Big Bang.

My theoretical work over the past three decades forecasts that the earliest stars formed about 70 million years after the Big Bang, so there is discovery room left to more ambitious space telescopes. Their future data will hopefully shed new light on the scientific version of the story of genesis: “Let there be light.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, former director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

Professional website:

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/

Social media:

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb

https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By CosmicSignals
      A team from the SETI Institute is exploring whether Raman spectroscopy could revolutionize how we identify resources in space without the need to land on celestial bodies. This technique, which analyzes light changes when it hits a target, might help scientists pinpoint the presence of minerals and water from orbit or during rapid flybys. It's an intriguing concept, especially considering the immense costs involved in traditional exploration methods.
      Raman spectroscopy is already employed in some of NASA's rovers, like Perseverance, which uses it to analyze Martian soil. The new project, supported by the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program, aims to expand this application. The idea of using a small spacecraft equipped with a Raman tool to survey multiple locations—like the Moon, asteroids, and even the moons of Mars—could significantly enhance our understanding of what resources exist in those areas.
      One major hurdle this project addresses is the uncertainty surrounding resource availability. As Pablo Sobron, the leading researcher, noted, current methods may lead to expensive miscalculations if a spacecraft lands in an unpromising spot. By identifying resources remotely, the hope is to mitigate the risks inherent in space mining ventures. This could pave the way for more targeted missions, reducing the financial gamble associated with exploratory landings.
      However, while Raman spectroscopy offers a promising method for remote sensing, it's essential to consider its limitations. The technique relies heavily on the conditions of the surface being studied. For instance, the presence of dust, ice, or other surface materials might interfere with the accuracy of the readings. The team will need to investigate these variables to ensure that the data collected will be reliable enough to dictate future missions.
      This approach may not only serve resource identification but could also benefit broader scientific objectives. If successful, it may allow for detailed examinations of areas such as Europa and Enceladus, which are of great interest in the search for extraterrestrial life. Using Raman spectroscopy as a non-invasive tool could enhance our understanding of these moons and their potential habitability, without the need for complex lander missions at this stage.
      The implications of such a method are extensive, particularly if it allows us to discover not just usable resources but also signs of past or present life on other celestial bodies. As we continue to search for evidence of life beyond Earth, having efficient and cost-effective ways to survey and analyze potential habitats could significantly alter our approach to astrobiology.
      What are your thoughts on using Raman spectroscopy for resource surveys in space? Do you think it could lead us to important discoveries regarding extraterrestrial life, or are there other methods that might yield better results?
    • By DisclosureWatch
      The recent release of the first images from ESA's JUICE mission has stirred a lot of buzz in the astronomy community. Seeing Jupiter's moons up close for the first time is truly stunning. It's interesting to note how different each moon looks, with some appearing icy and others showing signs of geological activity. Do you think these differences could hint at varying histories or potential for life?
      I'm particularly intrigued by Ganymede’s surface features. The images reveal a mix of bright and dark regions, suggesting a complex geologic past. It's fascinating to think about what processes could have shaped such a landscape. So, how do you all interpret these features based on what we know?
      Also, I noticed some commentary about Callisto and its heavily cratered surface. Many are wondering if its age could impact our understanding of the moon's history and potential future explorations. Are there theories out there that suggest why some moons are more geologically active than others?
      I can't help but think about how this mission will inform our understanding of the broader context of the Jupiter system. With the data coming in, we might be able to draw parallels to other celestial bodies in our solar system. Do you think this could reshape our ideas about habitability in extreme environments?
      As we await more data from JUICE, I wonder what specific aspects of these moons you find most exciting or puzzling. Which features do you think will provide the most groundbreaking insights into our understanding of the Jovian system? Let's keep the conversation going as more images and data come in!
    • By DisclosureWatch
      The Perseverance Rover has been on Mars for a while now, and with its recent findings, it's fascinating to see how much we've learned about the planet. Some of the data it has sent back are really pushing our understanding of Martian geology and potential past life. The high-resolution images and samples are showing details we didn't anticipate, especially considering how challenging the Martian environment is for a rover.
      One thing that caught my attention was the discovery of organic molecules in the Jezero Crater area. These findings could add weight to the theories about ancient microbial life existing on Mars. It seems like every week we're getting new insights that challenge our previous assumptions about the planet's history. What do you all think about the implications of finding organic materials?
      Moreover, the rover's ability to analyze the mineral composition of the Martian surface is impressive. The way it’s able to identify specific minerals and their locations tells us a lot about the planet's volcanic history and water presence. It makes me wonder how these details will contribute to future manned missions. Are we getting closer to establishing a human presence on Mars?
      Another interesting aspect is the rover's autonomous navigation system. It seems to be performing better than expected, allowing it to navigate tricky terrain without constant input from mission control. This level of autonomy could be a game changer for future missions. How do you think this technology can be applied to other planetary explorations?
      As the rover continues its work, I'm curious about how findings will impact our understanding of Mars in the long term. Will we eventually have enough data to formulate a clear picture of what happened there? Every new update feels like a step closer to answering that question, but I wonder if some mysteries might remain.
      I’d love to hear what aspects of the Perseverance Rover's mission you find most intriguing or unexpected. Any specific findings that made you rethink anything about Mars?
    • By AlienMan
      Roswell Incident Timeline: The Most Famous UFO Case in History
      The Roswell Incident remains one of the most famous and controversial UFO events ever reported.
      Beginning in July 1947, the incident sparked decades of speculation involving extraterrestrial spacecraft, government secrecy, and alien life.
      July 1947
      A rancher discovered unusual debris near Roswell, New Mexico.
      Military personnel soon collected the material.
      Initial Military Statement
      A military press release announced that a "flying disc" had been recovered.
      The announcement generated headlines across the country.
      Retraction
      Shortly afterward, officials stated the debris was actually a weather balloon.
      This explanation remains heavily debated.
      Rise of the UFO Theory
      During the following decades, witnesses came forward claiming:
      Alien bodies were recovered
      Secret military operations occurred
      Evidence was concealed from the public
      Modern Investigations
      Numerous books, documentaries, and investigations have examined the Roswell case.
      Despite decades of research, debate continues regarding what truly happened.
      Why Roswell Matters
      Roswell became a cultural phenomenon because it combined:
      UFO sightings
      Government secrecy
      Witness testimony
      Possible extraterrestrial contact
      Discussion
      What do you think happened at Roswell?
      Weather balloon, secret military project, or extraterrestrial spacecraft?
      Share your theories below.
    • By SpaceObserver
      With Artemis II gearing up for its lunar mission, I can't help but marvel at how far we've come since the Apollo days. The idea of humans venturing back to the Moon is thrilling, especially with the advancements we’ve made in technology and our understanding of the lunar environment. I’m particularly interested in how NASA plans to ensure the safety and success of the crew during their journey around the Moon.
      I read that the Orion spacecraft is undergoing some final tests to prepare for launch. It’s fascinating how they’re simulating conditions the crew will face, from the challenges of microgravity to life support systems. I wonder how they’re handling the psychological aspects of deep space travel, given that this will be the first crewed mission in decades. How do you all feel about the preparations they’re making?
      There’s also a lot of buzz about the Gateway, the lunar outpost that will eventually serve as a staging point for deeper space missions. I'm curious about how that will function in the long term. It seems like a critical component not just for Artemis II, but for future missions to Mars and beyond. Do you think the Gateway will live up to its expectations?
      And then there’s the science behind it all. The opportunity to conduct lunar research and potentially search for resources is something that could change our understanding of space travel. I’ve been reading about how Artemis II will help pave the way for sustainable human presence on the Moon. Are there particular scientific goals or experiments you’re excited about?
      Lastly, I’ve noticed there’s a lot of focus on collaboration with international partners and commercial entities this time around. It really feels like a collective effort toward space exploration. What do you think this means for the future of NASA missions and global space initiatives?
      I’m eager to see how this all unfolds. It feels like we’re on the cusp of a new era in space exploration. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and insights!
×
×
  • Create New...