Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*B76zbjSJ8UCxDXLGs0cQnA.jpeg
Recently, Earth arrived closest to the path of 3I/ATLAS through the Solar System. This 3D visualization shows the anti-clockwise orbit of Earth (and other planets) around the Sun, with positions marked for March 27, 2026. The past trajectory of 3I/ATLAS is shown in gray, including its elevation from the Earth’s ecliptic plane.

In the second half of March 2026, Earth arrived within its closest distance of 54.6 million kilometers from the path of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS through the Solar System. By now, 3I/ATLAS is heading out of the Solar System at a distance of 5.3 times the Sun’s distance from Earth.

Back on August 8–12, 2025, data the SPHEREx space observatory revealed a carbon-dioxide gas plume extending out to a distance of at least 348,000 kilometers from the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS (as reported in the caption of Figure 2 here).

In case this gas cloud around 3I/ATLAS was accompanied by solid fragments of debris from 3I/ATLAS, some of these fragments could have collided in recent months with Earth. Let us work some numbers that could educate us whether such collisions are possible.

The ejection speed required for a fragment to cross a distance of 54.6 million kilometers in the seven months that elapsed since August 2025 is 3 kilometers per second. This is just 5% of the speed of 3I/ATLAS through the Solar System, which is about 60 kilometers per second. But if these fragments departed from 3I/ATLAS ten years ago, when the interstellar object was located at a distance of 126 times the Earth-Sun separation, the required ejection speed would have been only 170 meters per second, comparable to the thermal speed of the gas molecules surrounding it. This implies that if 3I/ATLAS shed solid fragments from its surface a long time ago, some of these fragments could have potentially impacted Earth in recent months.

In a recent paper that I co-authored with Valentin Thos and Andi Burkert (accessible here), the mass of 3I/ATLAS was estimated, based on its non-gravitational acceleration, to be of order a billion metric tons. Assuming that a tenth of this mass was broken into fragment of centimeter-radius, a total of ten trillion fragments — each carrying a mass of 10 grams, were shed by 3I/ATLAS. The maximum fraction of these fragments that could intercept the Earth equals to the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the Earth divided by the surface area of a sphere with a radius of 54.6 million kilometers. This gives a total maximum of 34,000 fragments that would burn up as a result of their passage through the Earth’s atmosphere and appear as meteor fireballs in the sky.

The expected surge in the number of meteor fireballs scales in proportion to the fraction of the mass of 3I/ATLAS carried by the fragments (assumed to be 10% in the above estimate) and inversely with the fragment mass (assumed to be 10 grams above) or the square of the distance that the fragments traveled before hitting Earth (assumed to be 54.6 million kilometers above). Adopting more pessimistic values of a mass fraction of 1% and a distance similar to the Earth-Sun separation (150 million kilometers) still yields 30 extra fireballs triggered by meteoroids, each measuring 5 centimeter (2-inches) in diameter.

But even in the most optimistic scenario, where half the mass of 3I/ATLAS was lost to fragments, no excess meteoroids larger than a meter in diameter or a ton in mass, are expected. There is not enough mass available in 3I/ATLAS to create a sufficient number fragments so massive that one of them will intercept the Earth.

On March 21, 2026 at 4:40PM CT, a 1-ton meteoroid broke apart above the Houston metro area, producing loud boom and a 26-ton TNT equivalent airburst (as reported here). On March 17, 2026 at 8:57 AM ET, a 7-ton meteoroid exploded over Lake Erie, producing a boom and a 250-tons TNT equivalent airburst across Ohio and into Pennsylvania (as reported here). These recent fireballs are too energetic to be associated with 3I/ATLAS.

Nevertheless, there appears to be a surge in the number of smaller meteor fireballs during the first quarter of 2026. A report this week by the American Meteor Society (posted here) documented an increase by a factor of a few in the number of bright events witnessed by more than 200 people. Almost half of all March 2026 events were each seen by more than 50 people. The March 2026 average witness count per event was 142.7 — nearly three times the next-highest March on record (49.4 in 2021).

A systematic study of the directional and velocity information for the 2026 meteoroids of different sizes could assess which any subset of them might have properties consistent with past ejections of fragments by 3I/ATLAS towards Earth. If the timing, arrival direction and speed of any them are consistent with an ejection from 3I/ATLAS, then finding related meteorites on the ground would be revealing about the nature and origin of 3I/ATLAS.

***

Yesterday, NASA announced here that there is no reason to get excited because the recent surge in meteor fireballs is simply associated with the fireball season.

On a separate note, a NASA representative argued that a cone-shaped object on Mars is a rock that was naturally formed from Martian winds. When asked by a New York Post reporter about this assessment, I replied: “The conical object was observed by different cameras on the Curiosity rover and viewed from different angles, as discussed in my essay, posted at:

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/is-the-mysterious-cylinder-on-mars-photographed-in-2022-by-the-curiosity-rover-a-human-made-6fcd8e242fea

The Curiosity image clearly shows that no rock resembles this object within its natural environment. In addition, a rock is not expected to have a smooth cylindrical surface with a flat end. If this object is a rock, we should see other examples of it. I challenge the NASA representative to show us another example of a rock that resembles this object in any of the Curiosity rover images.

It is ironic that NASA named its rover Curiosity whereas NASA representatives lack any sense of curiosity about this anomalous object. By sweeping anomalies under the carpet of traditional thinking, we miss opportunities for discovering something new.”

1*scthyan8chYwwgi2P6MsBQ.jpeg
Drawing titled: “Cosmic Thoughts of Avi Loeb” by Azadeh. It arrived with the following message: “Dear Dr. Loeb, I wanted to take a moment to express my appreciation for your work. Your combination of scientific rigor, intellectual generosity, and genuine humility is rare and deeply inspiring for those of us following your research from the sidelines. Thank you for the example you set in how curiosity and humility can coexist at the highest levels of science. It genuinely means a lot. With respect, Azadeh”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

Professional website:

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/

Social media:

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb

https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By UAPResearcher
      In a recent YouTube video, Ross Coulthart makes some significant comments regarding UAP disclosure that could spark further discussions in our community. Coulthart is known for his investigative work and has been involved in various discussions around the subject of unidentified aerial phenomena. What’s particularly interesting is his perspective on the current state of UAP investigations and governmental transparency.
      One of the key points Coulthart addresses is the apparent lack of actionable data available to the public. Despite various reports and statements from government officials, there seems to be a gap between what's known within military circles and what’s shared with civilians. This discrepancy raises questions about the level of transparency we can expect moving forward. If the government has more evidence or insights, why is it not being disclosed?
      Coulthart also discusses witness accounts and the importance of personal testimony in shaping our understanding of UAP incidents. He emphasizes that firsthand accounts often hold more weight than many might realize. This resonates with many of us who are keen to hear the stories of military pilots or civilians who have had close encounters. These narratives add depth to the data we have and often reveal the emotional and psychological impacts of such experiences on witnesses.
      Additionally, the video touches on the role of investigative journalism in uncovering UAP-related information. Coulthart’s approach highlights the challenges reporters face when trying to obtain reliable information, especially when dealing with classified or sensitive material. This might prompt us to consider how we, as a community, can support more investigative efforts or advocate for clearer communication from officials.
      While Coulthart's insights are compelling, they also point to a broader concern: the ongoing struggle for clarity and credibility in UAP discussions. As more videos and reports come to light, balancing skepticism with open-mindedness is crucial. It remains to be seen how much the public will learn in the coming years and whether these discussions will lead to substantive changes in government policy.
      With all this in mind, what do you think are the most pressing questions we should be asking regarding government transparency on UAPs? Are there specific cases or incidents you feel need more investigation?
    • By DisclosureWatch
      The new meteor shower, the theta-Scorpiids, has been identified as being linked to the asteroid 2023 VN9. This asteroid, which is around 370 meters in diameter, is on a Jupiter-family comet orbit but appears inactive. The detection of the theta-Scorpiids by low-light cameras from CAMS and the Global Meteor Network suggests that the meteoroids from this shower share similar orbits with 2023 VN9, indicating a possible connection. If 2023 VN9 is indeed the surviving part of a cometary breakup, how often do these breakups occur?
    • By SpaceObserver
      A recent finding has connected the newly identified theta-Scorpiids meteor shower to asteroid 2023 VN9. Detected in mid-July 2026, this meteor shower was observed using low-light cameras from CAMS and the Global Meteor Network. What’s intriguing is that the trajectories of these meteoroids closely resemble the orbit of asteroid 2023 VN9, which is about 370 meters in diameter and classified as a Jupiter-family comet. This raises the possibility that 2023 VN9 could be a remnant from a comet that broke apart long ago, now masquerading as an asteroid.
      The theta-Scorpiids are a product of what seems to be an ancient cometary breakup, which has resulted in a stream of meteoroids that we can now see as a meteor shower. This connection suggests that what we perceive as a solid asteroid might actually be a cloaked comet, hidden in plain sight. The implications of this finding are fascinating, as they not only provide insight into the history of 2023 VN9 but also contribute to our understanding of cometary behaviors and their evolution over time.
      What's particularly notable is that this discovery was documented in a CBET telegram, which adds a layer of credibility to the observations. The telegram outlines the analysis and supports the notion that our solar system is full of complex relationships between asteroids and comets—objects that can switch roles depending on their activity.
      The idea that asteroids can be remnants of comets challenges the traditional view of these celestial bodies. Scientists have long studied asteroids and comets as distinct categories, but findings like this blur those lines. It prompts further questions about the lifecycle of such bodies and their potential to harbor ingredients for life.
      With the search for extraterrestrial life becoming increasingly advanced, understanding these objects could be crucial. Comets, often described as the building blocks of planets, can carry organic molecules and water, essential components for life. If 2023 VN9 does indeed have a cometary origin, it sparks curiosity about the materials that might have been delivered to early Earth or other celestial bodies.
      Moreover, this discovery highlights the continued reliance on citizen science and cutting-edge technology in astronomy. With limited federal funding for projects aimed at searching for extraterrestrial intelligence, initiatives like CAMS and the Global Meteor Network are vital for piecing together the puzzle of our cosmic neighborhood.
      As we continue to explore the cosmos, findings like the theta-Scorpiids remind us of the dynamic and ever-evolving nature of our solar system. The relationship between meteoroids, asteroids, and comets is likely more complex than we currently understand. What remains uncertain is how we can further investigate these connections to gain deeper insights into the history of our solar system and the potential for life beyond Earth.
      How do you think discoveries like this will influence our perception of asteroids in the context of life’s origins and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence?
    • By UAPResearcher
      A recent poll indicates that half of Americans are skeptical about UFOs. The details of this poll couldn't be verified due to access restrictions, but the headline raises interesting questions about public perception of UAPs.
      It’s striking that even with increasing reports from military personnel and official government acknowledgment, many people still doubt the existence of unidentified aerial phenomena. This skepticism seems to persist despite the ongoing UAP investigations and disclosures.
      Recent hearings and the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) by the Department of Defense have aimed to increase transparency surrounding UAP encounters, yet the divide in belief remains. How does this skepticism impact the willingness of witnesses—especially military pilots—to come forward with their own accounts? If half the population doubts these phenomena, it might discourage potential witnesses from sharing their experiences for fear of disbelief or ridicule.
    • By CosmicSignals
      It’s fascinating to observe how the recent reports released by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) have begun to reshape our understanding of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). According to the latest findings, which can be explored in detail at the government document source link, the reports highlight an increasing number of military encounters involving UAP that defy current technological explanations. The data compiled in these reports not only reinforces the seriousness with which the government is beginning to approach UAP investigations but also raises questions regarding the nature of these phenomena and their potential connections to extraterrestrial life.
      Among the notable aspects of the AARO reports is the acknowledgment of multiple credible sightings and the accounts of military personnel. These testimonies provide a rich tapestry of experiences from individuals who are trained to observe and report on aerial activities. While the reports do not definitively attribute these UAP to alien civilizations, the patterns observed warrant further investigation and raise intriguing possibilities regarding their origins. What stands out is the commitment to transparency and the establishment of a formal process for evaluating these anomalies.
      The potential implications of these findings are significant. The reports discuss incidents where UAP exhibited flight capabilities that surpass our current understanding of physics, leading many to speculate about their origins. Could these phenomena represent advanced technology developed by foreign nations, or might they hint at something beyond our current technological understanding? The lack of definitive answers in the reports emphasizes the need for continued investigation, as well as the importance of whistleblower testimonies that may provide further insight into the scope of UAP encounters.
      Moreover, the government’s increasing openness to declassifying information surrounding UAP suggests a shift in the cultural narrative. For decades, discussions surrounding UFOs were often relegated to the fringe of scientific inquiry. However, with the AARO reports and ongoing congressional hearings, we find ourselves at a pivotal moment where the dialogue is expanding to include credible scientific analysis. It raises the question of how we, as a society, can better harness this momentum toward systematic investigations that could ultimately lead to groundbreaking discoveries about life beyond Earth.
      As the conversation evolves, it’s essential to remember the distinction between what these reports establish versus what they imply. While the data points to unexplained aerial phenomena, it does not confirm extraterrestrial engagement. Still, the increasing rigor of these investigations suggests that we are moving closer to a comprehensive understanding of these UAP. For those of us interested in astrobiology and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, these developments are a reminder of the importance of remaining grounded in scientific inquiry while exploring the profound questions of life in the universe.
      Considering the information made available in the AARO reports and the context of ongoing investigations, what do you believe should be the next steps for government agencies in terms of transparency and public engagement regarding UAP? How can they best balance national security concerns with the public's right to know about phenomena that could redefine our understanding of life in the cosmos?
×
×
  • Create New...