Fast moving USO filmed at 421 meters depth
-
Similar Topics
-
By SpaceJunkie
Secretly Filmed UFO Documentary Highlights New UAP File Release: Key Takeaways and Analysis
A newly released documentary called Sleeping Dog is generating significant discussion within the UFO and UAP community. The film follows investigative journalist Jeremy Corbell and his long-running efforts to push for greater government transparency regarding unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs). The documentary arrives as a second batch of declassified UAP-related records has been released, creating renewed interest in the possibility of further disclosure.
Key Points From the Documentary
1. Focus on Government Transparency
The documentary centers on efforts to encourage government agencies to release additional information regarding unexplained aerial encounters. Corbell argues that governments have been studying unusual objects operating in restricted airspace for decades.
2. Previously Unreleased Footage
According to reports, the film includes previously unseen footage and interviews connected to UAP investigations. Several well-known figures in the UFO disclosure movement reportedly appear in the documentary, including whistleblowers and researchers who have pushed for public hearings and document releases.
3. Growing Public Interest in UAPs
The release reflects a broader shift in public discussion surrounding UFOs and UAPs. What was once considered a fringe topic is increasingly being discussed by lawmakers, military personnel, intelligence officials, and mainstream media outlets.
4. The "Something Is Imminent" Claim
One of the most discussed aspects of the article is the suggestion that disclosure efforts may be approaching a significant milestone. Supporters of the disclosure movement believe more information could emerge in the coming years, while skeptics argue that extraordinary claims still require extraordinary evidence.
What We Learned
The biggest takeaway from both the documentary and the latest UAP document releases is that government interest in unidentified aerial phenomena has not disappeared. Investigations continue, new records are being released, and public demand for transparency appears stronger than ever.
At the same time, the newly released information does not provide definitive proof of extraterrestrial visitation. Many questions remain unanswered, and much of the debate continues to revolve around incomplete data, classified information, and differing interpretations of available evidence.
Community Reaction
Reactions across UFO communities have been mixed. Some believe the latest releases represent meaningful progress toward disclosure, while others remain frustrated by the lack of clear, high-resolution evidence and verifiable conclusions. Discussions on Reddit and other UFO forums show both excitement and skepticism regarding claims that major revelations are imminent.
Final Thoughts
Whether you view the latest UAP releases as evidence of gradual disclosure or simply another step in a long-running investigation, interest in UFOs and unidentified aerial phenomena continues to grow. The combination of government document releases, congressional attention, whistleblower testimony, and new documentaries ensures that the topic remains one of the most closely watched mysteries of our time.
What do you think? Are we moving closer to full UAP disclosure, or are the latest releases raising more questions than answers?
Watch: Secretly Filmed UFO Documentary
A new documentary follows disclosure advocates and examines recently released UAP records.
Watch Video → -
By Avi Loeb Medium
An artist’s illustration of a magnetar — a rotating neutron star with a magnetic field of up to a quadrillion Gauss (a hundred billion Tesla). (Image Credit: Quanta Magazine)What would be the flagship signature of a very advanced, ambitious civilization?
One possibility is the technology to propel a spacecraft the size of New-York City along with its population of ten million residents to the speed of light over a period of about a year. This requires an average acceleration of 1 gee, similar to the surface gravity of Earth. The acceleration phase would feel like living on the surface of Earth, as according to Albert Einstein’s theory of General Relativity — there is no fundamental difference between an artificially-induced acceleration and gravitational acceleration. Keep in mind that an observer within a free-falling elevator feels no gravity whatsoever.
How can we drive roughly a million tons to the speed of light in one year? A simple technology that can accomplish that challenge is light sails. An Earth-size membrane, illuminated by a radio transmitter that harvests the total power of starlight on the surface of a habitable Earth-like planet, could carry this massive payload up to the speed of light over a period of a year. The optimal radio frequency to keep the light beam focused on the sail during the acceleration period is of order 1 gigahertz.
Given the motion of this narrow radio beam in our sky, this system would generate a fast radio burst (FRB) that lasts a thousandth of a second (millisecond) for a launch system at a cosmological distance of the order of billions of light years. The brightness of the FRB would be roughly about 1 Jansky. As it turns out, several thousand FRBs with millisecond duration and this brightness were detected at cosmological distances.
Could some of them be related to advanced technological civilizations? I raised this possibility in a paper that I published here in March 2017, with my then-postdoc, Manasvi Lingam. The publication date was seven months before the first interstellar object 1I/`Oumuamua was discovered, exhibiting a flat geometry as well as a non-gravitational acceleration that declines inversely with the square of its distance from the Sun, as expected from a light-sail. I therefore suggested that `I/`Oumuamua might be a light-sail (here) or a broken piece of a thin Dyson sphere (here) .
The light-sail conjecture for FRBs was sidelined and replaced by the popular hypothesis that the sources of these bright radio transients are relatives of fainter radio sources, called pulsars, which are routinely discovered in the Milky-Way galaxy. Pulsars are rotating neutron stars, relic from the collapse of the cores of stars more massive than 8 solar masses, after they consume their nuclear fuel. A neutron star typically packs 1.4 solar masses within a radius of 12 kilometers, about half the length of Manhattan Island. If its rotation axis is misaligned with its magnetic axis which beams radio waves, it appears as a pulsating lighthouse as the radio beam crosses our line-of-sight, hence the name pulsar. As of a result of their energy loss, pulsars spin down with the product of the spin-down rate scaling as the square of the magnetic field strength.
Typical pulsars display a magnetic field of up to a trillion (10^{12}) Gauss (equivalent to a hundred million Tesla), but some rare neutron stars show evidence for a magnetic field which is up to a thousand times larger. These are called magnetars. The popular view is that FRBs originate from the powerful radio beams emitted by magnetars and none are related to alien civilization.
Pulsars are born when the core of a massive star bounces, leading to the ejection of the envelope of the star. The energy released in the bounce is comparable to the gravitational binding energy of the relic neutron star, and typically 99% of it is carried by neutrinos — weakly interacting particles that escape relatively easily from the collapsed core. The remaining 1% drives an explosion — called a supernova — which disperses the debris of the stellar envelope into the surrounding interstellar medium and enriches it with the heavy elements that were cooked inside nuclear furnace of the progenitor star. Most of the weight of our body comes from oxygen and carbon that were produced by nearby supernovae.
Some supernovae appears to be an order of magnitude more luminous than typical supernovae, and are therefore labeled as superluminous supernova. A new paper that was just published in Nature magazine here, reports the discovery of a periodic modulation in the lightcurve of a superluminous supernova. The modulation is naturally explained by the precession of an accretion disk around a newly-formed magnetar. The measured spin period of 4.2 (± 0.2) millisecond and the inferred spindown rate are consistent with a magnetic field of a hundred trillion (10^{14}) Gauss (equivalent to ten billion Tesla). This constitutes the first discovery of the birth of a magnetar.
We now know how some magnetars can be born with the necessary spin period and magnetic field to produce FRBs. But are all FRBs associated with young magnetars?
Certainly not. Massive stars are short lived and so we expect magnetars to be born in young, star forming environments. However, we know that a subset of FRBs — represented for example by FRB 20240209A (reported here), reside in old, quiescent elliptical galaxies. This finding challenges the assumption that FRBs only originate from magnetars formed in young, star-forming region.
Science is fun when treated as a learning experience. It is based on the humility to learn, not the arrogance of expertise.
***
Before my morning jog at sunrise, I received the following uplifting message:
“Dear Professor Loeb,
I have been following your work for some time. Even as a non-scientist, I feel deeply moved and inspired by what I sense you are trying to do — both within your scientific vision and in the invitation that you extend to those willing to listen.
In your recent talks I sensed something very sincere: an open call to curiosity, to wonder, and to the courage of asking questions before we have answers. That invitation inspired the small visual poem I am sending you.
Please accept it simply as a humble gesture of participation in what I perceive as your call to a science that remains profoundly human.
For context, I am a poet. I recently published a book written in dialogue with an artificial intelligence — not as a tool, but as a respectful collaboration with what one might almost call an alien form of intelligence.
The image accompanying the poem was generated in that same spirit by the AI that collaborated with me.
Thank you for the curiosity and intellectual courage you bring to the public conversation about science.
Warm regards,
Andrea Fassone
In the House of θαυμάζειν
… it moves
still and
out of sync
yet in unison
through singularity
that feeling
is too little
of measure
and suspension
memore
beyond time
to nothing before
nor after
it aches
that something
behind
the stone cast
and me
who watches…
AF — IN MEDIA VIA”
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.
Professional website:
https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/
Social media:
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb
https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb
View the full article
-
By Avi Loeb Medium
A camera image of the bright meteor over Wellington, New Zealand at 23:25:37 local time on January 30, 2026. (Image credit: RNZ)On January 30, 2026 at 10:25:37 UTC, a bright green fireball from a meteor was spotted over Wellington Harbour, New Zealand (as reported here). The meteoroid was moving at an amazing speed of 71 kilometers per second relative to Earth. By itself, this speed is very close to the maximum value possible for the impact of an object bound to the Solar System with Earth. The upper limit on the impact speed of Solar System meteors follows from the following simple reasoning.
The Earth orbits the Sun at a speed of v=29.8 kilometers per second. This follows from balancing the centrifugal acceleration v²/r with the Sun’s gravitational acceleration, GM/r², where r is the radius of the Earth’s orbit, G is Newton’s constant and M is the mass of the Sun. The result is: v²=GM/r. On the other hand, the speed required to escape from the Sun’s gravitational potential at the radius r is obtained by balancing the kinetic energy per unit mass, 0.5(v_e)², with the potential energy, GM/r. This gives an escape speed that larger than the Earth’s speed v by a factor of the square root of 2, yielding v_e=1.414*v=42.1 kilometers per second. The largest speed of a Solar System meteor relative to Earth is obtained for an Oort Cloud bolide which happens to collide with Earth head on, opposite to the motion of Earth around the Sun.
The upper limit on the relative speed of a Solar System meteor is therefore: (29.8+42.1)=71.9 kilometers per second. This is very close to the speed of the recently discovered meteor. Hence, this meteor could have originated from the Solar System if it collided with Earth head on, opposite to its motion around the Sun. If not, then its high relative speed would imply that it is interstellar in origin. What do we know about interstellar meteors?
In June 2023, I led an expedition to the Pacific Ocean aiming to retrieve materials from the first recognized interstellar meteor, IM1 (as reported here). This meteor was detected on January 8, 2014 at 17:05:33 UTC. Its velocity relative to Earth was only 45 kilometers per second, but it arrived from behind the motion of the Earth around the Sun. Correcting for the Earth’s motion implied a speed of 60 kilometers per second relative to the Sun, well above the escape threshold of v_e=42.1 kilometers per second for Solar System objects (as derived in the discovery paper here). Indeed, the U.S. Space Command confirmed the interstellar origin of IM1 at the 99.999% confidence level (as documented here).
The IM1 impact site was localized based on the light radiated from the IM1’s fireball, which was detected by sensors aboard U.S. Government satellites. The light curve of the fireball showed three successive detonations separated by a tenth of a second from each other, with the last flare being the brightest and at a ram-pressure of 200 megapascals. This stress is four times higher than the maximum ram-pressure up to which the toughest iron meteorites from the solar-system survive. Indeed, IM1 displayed the highest material strength among all meteors in the CNEOS fireball catalog of NASA/JPL. The expedition recovered submillimeter-scale spherules (molten droplets) with a chemical composition that is different from known solar system materials. Upon entering the solar system, IM1 moved with an interstellar velocity of about 60 kilometers per second relative to the Local Standard of Rest of the Milky-Way galaxy, similar to that of 3I/ATLAS. The ocean expedition was documented in a Netflix documentary and a new book to be released within the coming year.
Is the 2026–01–30 meteor of interstellar origin as well? To find out, I used the velocity components, latitude longitude and altitude data compiled by the CNEOS fireball database here and corrected for the Earth’s motion in collaboration with my postdoc Richard Cloete, to find out that the velocity of this meteor relative to the Sun was 42.4 kilometers per second, very close to the escape threshold of v_e=42.1 kilometers per second. The difference between the two is within the measurement uncertainties. Since the local abundance of Solar System objects is a few orders of magnitude larger than that of interstellar objects, this meteor most likely originated in the Solar System. The 2026 meteor over New-Zealand collided with Earth nearly head-on and probably originated in the outer Solar System.
In difference from IM1 which exploded at an altitude of 18.7 kilometers over the Pacific Ocean, this new meteor exploded at a much higher altitude of 89.0 kilometers — implying a much lower material strength since the Earth’s atmosphere is highly rarefied at this altitude. This inference is consistent with the expected properties of a fragile iceberg from the Oort Cloud which could disintegrate at a low ram-pressure. Both fireballs radiated similar amounts of energy of about 3.82x10^{10} Joules, suggesting bolides with a radii of order 0.4–0.5 meters.
Here’s hoping that in the coming years we will witness the crash of an interstellar object that shows the characteristics of a Voyager-like probe from an extraterrestrial technological civilization that launched it from another star a few billion years ago. After all, most stars formed billions of years before the Sun and our own Voyager spacecraft will reach the opposite side of the Milky-Way disk within that time difference (as I calculated here with my student Shokhruz Kakharov). The search for interstellar meteors continues!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb
https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb
View the full article
-
By USH
The footage was reportedly recorded by Michelli Azuma on December 25, 2025, at around 9:52 a.m., while traveling along the Anhanguera Highway near Campinas, São Paulo.
In the video, a disc-shaped object appears to glide across the sky at a seemingly high speed. Its movement stands out when compared to the witness’s vehicle, estimated to be traveling at roughly 100 km/h, making the object’s motion appear unusually fast and controlled.
As with many such sightings, questions quickly arise: is this a genuine unidentified flying object, or could it be a drone or another advanced, man-made aerial device.
That uncertainty is further amplified in an era of rapid artificial intelligence development, where distinguishing between authentic footage and fabricated or digitally altered content has become increasingly difficult.
In the modern UFO debate, the line between what is real and what is fake has never been more blurred but the rise of AI generated UFO videos doesn’t disprove UFOs, but it raises the bar for evidence and while many sightings are eventually explained, a small percentage remain unresolved.
View the full article
-
By USH
During a live Fox News broadcast covering the intense Palisades wildfire in California, an unusual event captured viewers' attention. A camera aimed at the blazing inferno recorded a mysterious spherical object emerging suddenly from the middle of the flames. This object moved at a remarkable speed before vanishing over the treetops, leaving many wondering about its origin and purpose.
The object does not appear to be debris carried aloft by the fire’s updraft. Its trajectory and speed seem too controlled and deliberate to be a random effect of the wildfire. Additionally, the object shows no signs of explosion or disintegration, characteristics that might be expected if it were merely a piece of material affected by the intense heat.
Observers have ruled out common explanations such as birds, planes, or helicopters. The object’s rapid movement and apparent change in direction suggest advanced maneuverability, sparking comparisons to UFOs/UAPs.
With the growing number of reported sightings involving drones, orbs, and UFOs, the appearance of this potential UFO or drone in such an environment is especially intriguing. Could this object represent evidence of advanced technology monitoring Earth's natural disasters? Or is it an entirely natural but poorly understood phenomenon?
View the full article
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.