Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*YmLiozO79JiuCgE0JiZDqg.jpeg
Images of 3I/ATLAS, taken in the wavelength range of 0.75–5.0 microns between the 8 and 15 of December, 2025. Each image spans 300,000 kilometers on a side, comparable to the Earth-Moon separation. The brightness contours represent 5, 20 and 50 times the background noise; color bars are in mega-Jansky per steradian. The Sun is towards the left and the object’s velocity is towards the right. On the large scales displayed, the brightness map of dust and organics was found to be pear-shaped, with an anti-tail elongation in the direction of the Sun. All six other gas plumes were found to be nearly round. (Image credit: C.M. Lisse et al. 2026)

Imagine our civilization being ambitious enough to spread life-as-we-know-it among the stars. Seeding fertile territories with life is not a novel concept, but a prerequisite for long-term survival of any species here on planet Earth. Throughout history, humans survived by having kids, but they also aspired to build monuments like the pyramids to cement their mark on history.

The exchange of rocks between early Mars and Earth could have led to the transfer of life between these neighboring planets. Mars is smaller body and hence cooled earlier than Earth, because its surface to volume ratio is larger. As a result, Martian rocks that were lifted off the Martian surface by impacts of asteroids 4.2 billion years ago, could have delivered microbes to Earth and seeded life-as-we-know-it. The feasibility of this transfer was demonstrated by the Martian rock ALH84001, which was not heated to more than 40 degrees Celsius throughout its journey (as discussed here). Indeed, the origin of life in the form of our last universal common ancestor (LUCA) lived 4.2 billion years ago, based on the comparison of the genomes of a diverse range of 700 modern microbes. This is just a few hundred million years after Earth’s formation. For all we know, we might all be Martians.

The natural transfer of life by the delivery of rocks from one planet to another, called panspermia, is an inefficient process because only a tiny fraction of the space rocks reaches a fertile ground without burning up in the atmosphere. In principle, an interstellar gardener with ambitions to spread life technologically can do it far more effectively. The possibility of “directed panspermia” raises a fundamental question in astrobiology:

Was most life in the Universe seeded naturally or artificially?

Of course, the ambitions of humans should not be dictated by natural practices in our cosmic neighborhood. We can aspire to send life on interstellar journeys with the hope that it will land on a fertile ground, just as the dandelion flower spreads its seeds in the wind (a concept contemplated by Chris McKay, Paul Davies and Pete Worden here). By spreading life to blossom in multiple places throughout the Milky-Way galaxy, we would have constructed the longest-lived monuments of our existence, lasting beyond the 7.6 billion years left for the lifespan of the Sun.

What would be the most economic and technologically feasible technique to accomplish interstellar gardening?

As a matter of fact, the opportunity is currently passing in front of our eyes, in the form of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS. The latest data from the Webb telescope (reported here) indicates that the plume of gas and dust surrounding 3I/ATLAS contains water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH4), which can all be consumed by terrestrial lifeforms.

Consider the following hypothetical scenario. As soon as 3I/ATLAS was discovered on July 1, 2025, our space agencies launch an interceptor spacecraft on a trajectory that is designed to cross the forecasted path of the interstellar object at its closest approach to Earth on December 19, 2025. The spacecraft crashes into 3I/ATLAS as planned and deposits a capsule containing the seeds of terrestrial life into the belly of 3I/ATLAS. The delivered capsule contains radioactive material that keeps its environment warm and allows the terrestrial lifeforms to evolve, multiply and establish a stable colony of interstellar lifeforms inside 3I/ATLAS. Once 3I/ATLAS arrives to the vicinity of a habitable exoplanet after traveling for billions of years at 60 kilometers per second — more than twice as fast as all our spacecraft so far, its surface ice sublimates and released the lifeforms on dust particles like dandelion seeds.

An interstellar seeding mission of this type would be less expensive than the ~4 billion dollars cost of a terrestrial monument like the Freedom Tower (One World Trade Center) in New York City. It is feasible to accomplish with current technologies and space budgets and its realization is just a matter of priority.

Of course, if we can imagine doing that, other civilizations might have done so already. After all, we are latecomers to the cosmic stage and other space entrepreneurs could have had an earlier start for their seeding ambitions. This leads to my third question:

Are there any lifeforms on the dust shed by 3I/ATLAS?

The latest data from the SPHEREx space observatory includes the detection of organic molecules like CH3OH, H2CO, CH4, and C2H6 with a production rate that is 14% of water molecules (as reported here).

The most notable finding from the latest SPHEREx and Webb data is the robust spectroscopic detection of methane (CH4) production. Methane was only detected after the passage of 3I/ATLAS near the Sun. Its delayed production raises interesting questions because methane ice is hyper-volatile, with a significantly lower sublimation temperature than carbon dioxide (CO2). This implies that methane ice near the surface of 3I/ATLAS would have been vigorously sublimating at the time of the first reports of outgassing from 3I/ATLAS before perihelion. However, neither the Webb spectroscopy nor the SPHEREx spectrophotometry from August 2025, detected methane. This suggests that methane is depleted in the outermost layers of 3I/ATLAS and was exposed to warming by sunlight only close to the Sun. Within this scenario, the early detection of carbon-monoxide (CO) outgassing on 3I/ATLAS is surprising as carbon monoxide is more volatile than methane and should therefore be depleted from the surface, yet it was detected prior to methane. Could it be that the detected methane is produce by lifeforms?

These facts lead me to repeat my question once again:

Does 3I/ATLAS carry any lifeforms?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*grMVAGuoEmk9A0uQcoJlcg.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorAviLoeb https://open.spotify.com/show/1zhndXkvSY2b8FdjspFpCd
https://x.com/ProfAviLoeb

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By SpaceObserver
      A detail that might get lost in discussions about extraterrestrial life is the common argument that the vast distances in space make alien visitation impossible. Astroparticle physicist Matthew Szydagis, in an interview with Ross Coulthart, suggests that this argument overlooks fundamental principles established by Albert Einstein over a century ago. Szydagis discusses how many seem to forget their own textbooks when it comes to understanding the universe's potential for life beyond Earth.
      Szydagis points out that Einstein's theories on relativity provide a framework for understanding how time and space are interconnected. He argues that while the distances to other stars and galaxies are indeed daunting, that doesn't necessarily preclude the possibility of intelligent life traveling across them. In fact, given the nature of space-time, there might be more ways to traverse these distances than we currently understand, such as the concept of wormholes or advanced propulsion technologies that could one day be realized.
      This conversation also touches on how modern astrophysics, including missions like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), is reshaping our understanding of the universe. The JWST is already providing insights into the atmospheres of exoplanets, allowing scientists to search for biosignatures that could indicate the presence of life. Szydagis’s remarks remind us that while we often consider the physical limitations of traveling across the cosmos, the advances we’re making in astronomy could offer new answers to those questions.
      However, it’s crucial to recognize the limitations of Szydagis’s claim. While theoretical physics opens up fascinating possibilities, they remain speculative without empirical evidence. The scientific community continues to grapple with the challenges of detecting and confirming extraterrestrial life. The increasing amount of data from missions exploring exoplanets does fuel optimism, but it doesn't provide definitive proof of alien civilizations existing or having the capability to visit us.
      As we delve deeper into the cosmos, it's worth considering the role of theoretical physics in guiding our understanding of these vast distances. Szydagis’s exploration of these ideas compels us to think critically about the assumptions we make regarding space travel and the possibility of life beyond Earth. It raises an important question: Are we limiting our view of the universe by focusing solely on the distances involved, rather than considering the potential for breakthroughs in our understanding of physics?
      As the debate continues, it would be interesting to hear thoughts on how advancements in theoretical physics could reshape our search for extraterrestrial life. Are we on the verge of discovering new methods that challenge current limitations, or will we always be bound by the vastness of space? This discussion opens up avenues for both skepticism and hope in our quest to uncover the mysteries of the universe.
    • By UAPResearcher
      ETH Zurich and the SETI Institute announced a strategic scientific partnership today. The US-based research organization will provide start-up funding for a new assistant professorship and associated research activities at ETH Zurich. Bill Diamond (left), SETI Institute President and CEO, and ETH President Joël Mesot seal the partnership at ETH’s main building in Zurich. (Image: Daniel Winkler / ETH Foundation) September 1, 2026, Mountain View, CA --The question of how life originated and whether it exists elsewhere in the universe has fascinated humanity for centuries. Now, ETH Zurich and the SETI Institute in California are joining forces to seek answers. The two institutions have agreed on a strategic partnership and signed a corresponding agreement. At the heart of the collaboration is a new assistant professorship, to be called ‘Earth and Planetary Evolution’, which will be based in
      The source gives us a useful starting point, but the underlying details and evidence are still worth examining closely.
      Which detail in this report do you think deserves the closest follow-up?
      https://www.seti.org/news/seti-institute-and-eth-zurich-join-forces
    • By CosmicSignals
      ETH Zurich and the SETI Institute have announced a groundbreaking partnership aimed at unraveling the complexities surrounding the origin of life. This collaboration includes the establishment of a new assistant professorship in Earth and Planetary Evolution, which will be supported by a significant funding commitment of $8.5 million from the SETI Institute over the next decade. It’s a move that could potentially deepen our understanding of whether life exists beyond our planet.
      The new professorship will be situated at ETH Zurich’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, specifically within the Centre for Origin and Prevalence of Life (COPL). This center, which was founded just a couple of years ago, focuses on critical questions about how life arises and the conditions necessary for life to thrive. The partnership is expected to invigorate research into topics such as biosignatures—indicators that might reveal the presence of life—and the conditions that make planets habitable.
      One interesting aspect of this collaboration is the emphasis on interdisciplinary research. By integrating knowledge from both Earth and planetary sciences, the partnership aims to create a comprehensive understanding of life's evolutionary trajectory. This approach could lead to innovative methods for detecting biosignatures on distant exoplanets, enhancing the ongoing search for extraterrestrial life.
      As we explore the vast cosmos, understanding the conditions that foster life on Earth can provide valuable insights into where we might find life elsewhere. The focus on Earth and planetary evolution is particularly crucial, as it allows scientists to consider how environmental changes influence the development of life. This could pave the way for new research methods and technologies in astrobiology, potentially bringing us closer to answering the age-old question: Are we alone in the universe?
      However, while the partnership presents promising opportunities, it also raises questions about the practical applications of their findings. For example, how will this collaboration translate into actionable research outcomes? And what specific methodologies will be employed to study habitability in different environments? These questions remain open as the project unfolds, highlighting the uncertainties inherent in scientific exploration.
      In essence, this partnership between ETH Zurich and the SETI Institute could be a significant step forward in the scientific quest to understand life’s origins and its potential existence beyond Earth. But with any new undertaking, there are challenges to consider. Will the combined expertise of these institutions lead to groundbreaking discoveries, or will the complexities of life’s origins prove more elusive than anticipated?
    • By MysteryFiles
      ETH Zurich and the SETI Institute have formed a partnership focused on unraveling the mysteries of how life originated on Earth and potentially elsewhere in the universe. This collaboration will establish a new assistant professorship called 'Earth and Planetary Evolution' at ETH Zurich. This role aims to enhance research in the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and will be part of the Centre for Origin and Prevalence of Life (COPL).
      The new professorship will tackle essential topics related to biosignatures, which are measurable indicators of life, and the concept of habitability, indicating whether environments can support life. Researchers will also examine how life interacts with its environment over time, both on Earth and on exoplanets.
      Funding for this initiative is notable; the SETI Institute will contribute $8.5 million over ten years to support this new position and its the research. As ETH President Joël Mesot stated, collaboration is crucial for addressing complex scientific questions.
      Nobel Laureate Didier Queloz, who directs COPL, expressed that the partnership creates a robust link between ETH Zurich and the SETI Institute. This collaboration combines expertise from different scientific fields to explore the origin and prevalence of life beyond Earth.
      As scientists investigate the potential for life in various environments, it may reshape our understanding of where life might exist. How will the research conducted under this new professorship differ from previous studies?
    • By DisclosureWatch
      The SETI Institute reported significant advancements in their research and outreach during the second quarter of 2026. They published over 80 peer-reviewed papers across fields like astrobiology and planetary science, which suggests they’re making meaningful contributions to our understanding of potential extraterrestrial life.
      One highlight was a new $5.7 million cooperative agreement from NASA to support projects like the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). This funding could enhance our capacity to detect habitable exoplanets, a crucial step in the search for life beyond Earth. With funding being a constant concern, especially for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, this agreement may provide a much-needed boost to ongoing efforts.
      Additionally, the institute secured $1 million in STRIDE awards aimed at research and public engagement. These efforts emphasize not just scientific discovery but also the importance of communicating these findings to the public. The appointment of new fellows indicates a commitment to nurturing fresh talent in these fields.
      The SETI Institute has also been active in sharing their findings, notably through discussions surrounding technosignatures from interstellar object 3I/ATLAS. Their outreach efforts highlight the ongoing interest in the potential for contact with extraterrestrial civilizations, even as the challenges of limited funding remain.
      Despite these successes, the report reflects a broader issue: the sustained search for extraterrestrial intelligence relies heavily on external support and funding. While the institute is making strides in research, the uncertainty surrounding federal funding could impact future explorations and projects.
      This leads to an interesting question: how sustainable is the current momentum in extraterrestrial research without guaranteed funding? Are we at risk of stalling in the quest for discovery if public interest or private support wanes?
×
×
  • Create New...