Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*WJkVGvl6v0ehO25J07u50Q.jpeg
(Image credit: Scientific American)

In a new paper that was just accepted for publication yesterday (and posted as a preprint here), I reported with Mauro Barbieri that tomorrow, January 22, 2026, the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS will arrive at its rare “full Moon phase” — when observers from Earth will see it from the direction of the Sun to within an extremely small misalignment angle of just 0.69 degrees (0.012 radians). This rare alignment will result in a brightness surge whose magnitude and growth rate could constrain the composition and structure of the particles shed by 3I/ATLAS.

Over the past week, I shared this paper with observers who have access to suitable telescopes with the hope that they will take advantage of this rare alignment of 3I/ATLAS with the Sun-Earth direction.

At solar opposition, the anti-tail jet will be pointing at Earth. The alignment can shed new light — literally speaking — on the nature of the anti-tail and resolve some anomalies (as listed here), such as its unprecedented polarization properties (as reported here and here).

When taking into account the large velocity of 3I/ATLAS relative to the Sun supplemented by the pushback from the solar wind and radiation, the material carried by the anti-tail including the poisonous cyanide, has no chance of reaching the Earth and affecting our life. The only exception involves technological mini-probes which can maneuver enough to bridge the gap between 3I/ATLAS and the Earth.

The latest anomaly of 3I/ATLAS that might flag a technological signature is the symmetric system of 3 mini-jets that supplement the anti-tail in 24 Hubble images taken over the past couple of months (as discussed here).

***

Today, before my morning jog at sunrise I received an uplifting message from my visionary colleague, Dr. Frank Laukien, in reference to my previous essay, titled: “Interstellar Hitchhiking on Objects Like 3I/ATLAS”, posted here:

“Hi Avi,

The large interstellar object (ISO) hitchhiking idea is brilliant, if a technological civilization advances to where it can control propulsion technology for a gentle rendezvous and landing mission with a fast ISO. That’s not such a big stretch even for human technology, as we are not talking about approaching the speed of light — far from it.

Let’s think through this fascinating scenario some more:

The hitchhiking technological civilization would have to almost certainly master fusion technology, with a closed tritium breeding fuel cycle, something also within reach of our technology within decades. Then fuel is nearly inexhaustible.

Being inside a natural ISO has major advantages of camouflage, as you point out, but also of radiation shielding for either some form of biological life, or for electronics that needs to last for eons without radiation damage.

While landing on a large, fast ISO is hard, it may be much easier than building such heavy technological megastructures in the orbit of some home exoplanet with otherwise enormous launch costs against the gravity of that exoplanet.

Or maybe an extraterrestrial (ET) civilization catches and modifies a star-bound slower asteroid or comet, or planetesimal, and then keeps accelerating it with hydrogen fuel and fusion energy for hundreds or thousands (or more) of years until it is fast enough to be an ISO?

A large ISO could accommodate biological populations of 10k-100k or perhaps larger populations, even when extrapolating from the size of humans, and much larger if the intelligent aliens are much smaller than humans, e.g., like massive ant colonies. That solves the incestuous genetic degradation and extinction problem of small populations observed on Earth in animals or humans.

However, much smaller biological species may not have the physical or mental capacity and brain size and metabolic energy to evolve into a technological civilization. But who knows?

If it is just non-biological AI on such a technological ISO, size could shrink further, aging would slow way down, and reproduction could be by technological production, but power consumption may go up. Radiative cooling of hot AI chips, or GPU/TPUs in space should be very feasible, given the cold exterior.

Finally, what could be the motivation behind all of this?

Extrapolating from humanity, it may be obvious: the greatest civilizational motivations came from religions, which are not necessarily rational, but mythical, irrational belief systems that keep evolving and are very durable, and long-lived.

Religions or mystical belief systems can lead to enormous technological feats, for irrational religious purposes, like building pyramids or the mysterious stone sculptures of the Easter Islands (and large temples, churches, mosques, and monuments).

So, maybe a potentially technological 3I/ATLAS type ISO is actively pursuing a rational exploration, missionary or conquest task. Or maybe it is just a space monument of an extant or extinct technological civilization that wanted its share of near-immortality or fame or it had a missionary purpose by seeding our galaxy with technological ISOs that can last for billions of years. They could still have active technology on them, e.g., fusion-powered hydrogen propulsion or thrusters, or it could be inactive space archeological objects by now.

But if these are ISO monuments of some distant ET civilizations, why build a few of them so big, rather than seeding with billions or trillions of small ISOs? Perhaps ‘because they could’! The Egyptians built very few, very large pyramids rather than thousands of little ones,

and one large Stonehenge was more impressive than hundreds of little scaled constructs.

Once we do not dogmatically rule out technological explanations, it just opens up our minds to possible scenarios that are fascinating, and some of them seem quite plausible.

3I/ATLAS, even if it turns out to be natural, has already been such an eye-opener, at least for those who dared to look through new conceptual lenses — like you!

Best wishes,

Frank”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*grMVAGuoEmk9A0uQcoJlcg.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By CosmicSignals
      A recent study presents a novel idea for searching for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence: examining lunar regolith for microscopic engineered particles. Led by Dr. Lewis Pinault from the SETI Institute, this research outlines a quantitative framework for investigating whether tiny, durable particles from past technological civilizations could have accumulated on the Moon over billions of years.
      The researchers suggest that instead of focusing solely on radio or laser signals from potential alien civilizations, we might find evidence of their existence in the form of microscopic debris. This approach is intriguing because the Moon, lacking an atmosphere, flowing water, or tectonic activity, has preserved material from across the Solar System for approximately four billion years. This stability makes it a unique archive of the Milky Way’s history.
      Dr. Pinault points out that the Moon has been continuously collecting dust and materials, much of which could predate the Moon itself. The hope is that if advanced civilizations produce durable microscopic debris—either as a direct result of their activities or as unintended byproducts—some of that material could be embedded in the lunar soil.
      The study emphasizes that while it does not claim to have found extraterrestrial technosignatures, it lays out a practical observational framework for future lunar sample-return missions. The authors propose that by carefully analyzing about one cubic meter of lunar regolith with modern microscopy and AI-assisted imaging, we could begin to determine the presence of artificial materials that might hint at past technological life.
      The methodology outlined involves using advanced techniques such as tomography and spectroscopy to sift through lunar soil. Such techniques could help establish limits on the amount of artificial material produced by technological civilizations throughout the history of the Galaxy. This information could then shed light on how many technologically capable civilizations might have existed in our Milky Way.
      One aspect that stands out in this proposal is how it reframes our search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Traditionally, SETI has concentrated on signals sent from other civilizations, but looking for physical remnants could reveal a broader narrative of intelligent life in the cosmos. It raises questions about how we define evidence of alien life and what forms that evidence might take.
      However, the study does have limitations. It does not provide evidence of such particles existing on the Moon, nor does it guarantee that future missions will find them. The success of this approach depends heavily on the next steps taken by lunar exploration missions, which will need to incorporate these new methodologies into their sampling and analysis processes.
      As we delve deeper into this line of inquiry, it poses a fascinating question: if we were to find signs of past civilizations on the Moon, what would that mean for our understanding of life in the universe? Could we be on the verge of discovering that we are not alone, but rather part of a much larger historical tapestry of intelligent life? The implications could be profound not only for astrobiology but for humanity's place within the cosmos.
    • By CosmicSignals
      A recent study suggests that the Moon could be a key site for searching for microscopic technosignatures—tiny, engineered particles left behind by technological civilizations. This idea shifts the focus from traditional methods like radio signal detection to examining lunar regolith, which has been collecting material from space for billions of years. Lead researcher Dr. Lewis Pinault from the SETI Institute outlines a framework for detecting these potential remnants of past civilizations.
      One striking detail is that, unlike Earth, the Moon has no atmosphere or flowing water to erode ancient material. This makes the lunar surface a stable archive, allowing for the possibility that microscopic debris from advanced civilizations could have survived the passage of time. The study emphasizes the potential for discovering evidence that might have been overlooked in other searches.
      The researchers propose that if advanced civilizations create durable microscopic debris, this material could become embedded in the Moon's surface. Over a four-billion-year period, the lunar regolith has collected dust and particles from the Solar System and beyond, creating a unique historical record. The study does not claim to have found these technosignatures but sets the groundwork for future lunar missions to search for them.
      Using modern microscopy and AI-assisted imaging techniques, scientists could analyze one cubic meter of lunar regolith to establish limits on the amount of artificial material present. This could provide insights into the number of technologically capable civilizations that may have existed in our galaxy. The framework proposed could pave the way for future missions to test these hypotheses, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of life beyond Earth.
      The notion that the Moon could hold remnants of ancient technologies raises intriguing questions about our own search for extraterrestrial life. If tiny particles from lost civilizations have made their way to the Moon, what other secrets might our celestial neighbor hold? This study urges us to reconsider how we approach the search for life beyond our planet by expanding our focus to include the Moon as a site of potential discovery.
      As the lunar surface continues to be explored, the potential for uncovering these technosignatures invites further investigation. What might we learn about the history of civilizations, both terrestrial and extraterrestrial? The challenge lies in devising methods to distinguish natural lunar materials from those that may be artificial in origin.
      Given the exciting possibilities ahead, how might future lunar sample-return missions adapt their methods to search specifically for these microscopic traces of technology? The answers could significantly impact our understanding of life in the universe.
    • By SpaceObserver
      This topic feels particularly intriguing as it touches on the ever-fascinating relationship between public perception and the reality of our lunar explorations. In a recent NewsNation video, journalist Ross Coulthart takes on viral claims suggesting that astronauts like Neil Armstrong were secretly warned against returning to the moon, a notion that plays into our collective fascination with extraterrestrial life. However, Coulthart dismisses these claims, emphasizing that they lack credible evidence. Instead, he points out that NASA has real questions to answer regarding certain anomalous objects observed near the lunar surface.
      Coulthart's skepticism towards the viral narrative about astronauts' warnings is grounded in a lack of substantiated proof. He stresses that while these claims can easily capture the public's imagination, they don’t hold up under scrutiny. This brings us back to NASA's role in lunar exploration and the importance of transparency in communicating findings about the moon, particularly as we're gearing up to return with upcoming missions.
      One aspect that Coulthart highlights revolves around the need for NASA to properly address the existence of strange objects near the moon. While he doesn’t delve into specifics, the notion that there are unexplained phenomena in our immediate cosmic neighborhood raises valid points for scientific inquiry. The ongoing efforts of missions like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and the Artemis program are vital, not just for new discoveries, but also for keeping the public informed and engaged.
      With the Artemis program set to bring humans back to the moon, the timing of this discussion is significant. As we prepare for a new era of lunar exploration, questions about what we might encounter—whether it be geological findings or unexpected artifacts—are more relevant than ever. Coulthart’s remarks underline the necessity for NASA to provide clarity and context about these anomalies, ensuring that speculation doesn’t overshadow scientific validity.
      Moreover, the way we communicate about our findings can shape public perception. If NASA fails to adequately explain the nature of these anomalies, it could inadvertently fuel conspiracy theories. This cycle of speculation can detract from genuine scientific discourse and the excitement surrounding space exploration. It’s crucial for scientists and agencies to bridge the gap between their findings and public understanding.
      As we look ahead to lunar missions, the conversation surrounding the moon’s unexplained features and the myths that spring from them reminds us that exploration is as much about discovering the unknown as it is about understanding what we already know. Given the mixed reception of Coulthart's video, it raises a broader question: how should NASA enhance its communication strategies to foster a better public understanding of lunar anomalies while minimizing sensationalism?
    • By CosmicSignals
      A small but intriguing detail in Avi Loeb's recent commentary on the potential for moon bases and UFO sightings has caught my attention. In the video titled 'Moon base with UFOs? Avi Loeb weighs in', Loeb delves into the implications of constructing bases on the Moon and the associated phenomena that could suggest extraterrestrial activity. It’s especially interesting how he links these concepts to the ongoing search for technosignatures and the broader context of astrobiology.
      One of the moments that stands out is when Loeb discusses the potential for human-made structures on the Moon to inadvertently attract or even interact with alien technologies. This raises fascinating questions about the nature of alien civilizations and their possible engagement with our celestial neighbors. If we consider the Moon as a potential outpost for future exploration and habitation, could it also serve as a vantage point for observing extraterrestrial activity? This leads us to consider the implications of such interactions and whether they could offer clues about alien life.
      Loeb's perspective encourages us to think critically about the scientific possibilities surrounding habitability beyond Earth. For instance, he posits that if we were to encounter UFOs near a lunar base, it might suggest an advanced civilization is exploring our solar system. This notion aligns with SETI's goals of detecting signs of extraterrestrial intelligence. It also poses the question: what kind of technosignatures or biosignatures might we expect to find in such scenarios? As researchers refine their techniques for detecting signs of life, it's essential to keep an open mind about the locations and forms it might take.
      Moreover, the discussion touches upon the broader implications of our search for life in the universe. With the advancement of technology and our understanding of astrobiology, could we be on the brink of discovering evidence of alien life not just on distant exoplanets, but in our own backyard? The Moon, as Loeb suggests, could be a crucial piece of this puzzle. His insights remind us that space exploration is not just about looking outward but also understanding the potential for the unexpected in our immediate vicinity.
      As we reflect on the claims made in the video, it’s essential to maintain a healthy skepticism and a scientific approach. While the ideas presented are thought-provoking, they also require rigorous evaluation and evidence. This leads me to wonder: if we were to find definitive proof of alien technology or life, how would that change our current paradigms in astronomy and astrobiology? What steps should we take to prepare for such a discovery, and how do we approach the ethical considerations that come with it? I look forward to hearing your thoughts on these questions and any additional insights from the video that might be worth discussing.
    • By MysteryFiles
      There's a recent video titled 'Giant UFOs Near Moon? What Scientists Claim They Saw' from Hot Take with Jesse Weber that has sparked my interest, particularly given its implications for our understanding of unexplained phenomena in our solar system. The video presents claims about large unidentified objects observed near the Moon, stirring both excitement and skepticism among viewers. It's worth noting that while such sightings can often fall into the realm of speculation, they also highlight the ongoing curiosity about what lies beyond our planet.
      One of the key moments in the video that caught my attention was the mention of specific observations made by scientists as they analyzed data from lunar missions. The idea that there may be large, unexplained objects near the Moon opens up a plethora of questions about their origins and nature. Are they indeed extraterrestrial in origin, or could they be a result of misinterpreted natural phenomena? This reminds me of historical accounts of strange sightings that have often been dismissed until further evidence was brought to light.
      Given the advances in technology and imaging, it’s not uncommon for new types of data to emerge that challenge our existing perceptions. The Moon is often considered a stepping stone for future manned missions to Mars and beyond, so sightings of this nature could indicate more than just a curiosity. They might suggest something significant about our solar neighborhood. The scientific rigor behind these claims, as discussed in the video, raises a crucial point—should we take these observations seriously? How do we balance skepticism with the excitement of potential discoveries?
      It’s also interesting to reflect on how the public reacts to such claims. In the past, sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena have often led to wild speculation and theories that aren’t always grounded in facts. The video encourages viewers to approach the topic with an open yet critical mindset, which is essential in a field where data can be misinterpreted or sensationalized. As we explore these claims, it’s important to remain grounded in what is known and what remains to be understood.
      As someone deeply interested in the unexplained aspects of space, I wonder what fellow forum members think about this video and the claims made. Do you find the prospect of giant UFOs near the Moon credible, or do you lean more toward skepticism? Have you encountered other noteworthy incidents that align with or contradict these observations? Let’s discuss the implications of what we might be seeing and the broader context of such claims in our quest for understanding the universe.
×
×
  • Create New...