Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1*v2--sr95XRhF59Cdz5Bx8A.png
1*d1vCepLbA1RcoAGHU5EVeg.png
Image of 3I/ATLAS, taken on January 7th, 2026 by the Hubble Space Telescope (top panel), and processed through the Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter (bottom panel). The bottom panel shows a triple jet structure with a prominent anti-tail jet in the direction of the Sun, towards the lower left corner of the image. The anti-tail extends to a scale of order the Earth-Moon separation. (Image credit: Toni Scarmato, based on data released by NASA/ESA/STScI here)

When the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS was first imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope on July 21st, 2025, it became evident that the glowing halo of light around it extends by an extra factor of ~2 towards the Sun. Given that the observing line-of-sight was only 10 degrees away from the sunward direction at that time, this implied that the actual extended structure is of a jet that is 1/sin(10 degrees)=5.8 times more elongated than observed in the projected image, namely ~11.6 times longer than it is wide.

But the most surprising fact about this jet is that it is oriented in the sunward direction. Usually, the elongated feature around comets is oriented away from the Sun. The physical reason is simple: the solar-wind push on gas and the solar radiation push on dust create the appearance of a cometary tail extending away from the Sun relative to the nucleus. But 3I/ATLAS exhibits a physical anti-tail that is definitely not a visual illusion due to a projection effect created by a special viewing angle.

Intrigued by this unusual phenomenon, I wrote three papers (posted here, here and here), attempting to explain the physics behind it. When the first paper in this series, co-authored with my colleague Dr. Eric Keto, was submitted for publication in “The Astrophysical Journal Letters,” we were informed by the editor that the paper will not be sent for review because: “I believe that your results would be of rather limited interest to the astrophysics research community as a whole.” Disappointed by this response, we submitted the paper to the competing journal “Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society”, where it was accepted for publication after a very favorable referee report. This experience shows how subjective the editorial and peer-review process is in academia.

By now, it is clear that the anti-tail jet of 3I/ATLAs is one of its major anomalies, because it is clearly observed in post-perihelion images taken from different perspectives during the past couple of months. These images show (as I described most recently here, here and here) a prominent anti-tail jet that extends out to 400,000 kilometers from the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS towards the Sun.

The anti-tail is evident in the latest Hubble image, taken on January 7th, 2026. The application of a Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter that removes the circularly symmetric glow around the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS reveals a triple jet structure with a major tightly-collimated anti-tail jet towards the Sun. The two minor jets are equally separated in angle from each other and the anti-tail, and are not oriented away from the Sun — as expected from a familiar cometary tail.

As inferred from the first Hubble image on July 21, 2025, the anti-tail jet is tightly collimated and an order of magnitude longer than it is wide. The tight collimation and the prominence of the anti-tail relative to any tail feature, are surprising given that the anti-tail jet goes through the countering pressure of the solar wind and the solar radiation. Given that, I beg to differ with the above-mentioned editorial opinion. The physics responsible for this remarkable anti-tail jet is not “of rather limited interest to the astrophysics research community”.

From the wobble of the anti-tail jet around the rotation axis when 3I/ATLAS was approaching the Sun (as reported here), it became clear that its rotation axis is pointed at the Sun to within 7 degrees at large distances. This constitutes another unexplained anomaly on top of the alignment of the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS with the ecliptic plane, each with sub-percent probability — making their combined geometry unlikely at a level below 0.0001. NASA officials did not mention these geometric anomalies at their press conference about 3I/ATLAS on November 19, 2025, when they concluded that 3I/ATLAs behaves like a regular comet. Obviously, if one ignores the unexplained anomalies of 3I/ATLAS, one would conclude that there is nothing surprising about it. The easiest way to argue that we fully understand something is by ignoring what we do not understand about it.

However, the foundation of science is the humility to learn, not the arrogance of expertise. What is the point of pursuing science if practitioners claim that they understand nature based on past knowledge even when data shows that they might be missing something. Our ability to learn something new is limited by our willingness to admit what we are missing. Anomalous data should not be “of rather limited interest to the astrophysics research community”, but instead of great interest for the astrophysics research community.

Science is fun as long as we treat it as a learning experience. Curiosity is a genuine trait of a beginner’s mind. My hope is that the next generation of scientists will do better than my generation in revolutionizing our perception of our cosmic neighborhood. The Universe will not appear a lonely place if we find residents in our cosmic street. Finding these residents would update the priorities of humanity beyond Earth.

In a WORLD.MINDS forum led by the brilliant Rolf Dobelli yesterday, I asked the historian Sir Niall Ferguson: “Could science bring humanity to pursue a vastly better future than its past?” Niall responded that science is not separate from power politics. He argued that throughout history, humans evolved as fighters and killers. The 20th century saw extraordinary scientific breakthroughs and unprecedented mass killings. Niall suggested that these facts are not unrelated.

Niall is right about our past. But I am hopeful that an encounter with a more accomplished extraterrestrial civilization will make our future better, as we receive our inspiration from the stars. As Oscar Wilde noted: “We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” For that reason, when we observe interstellar objects in our backyard, we should not treat their anomalies as being “of rather limited interest.” Instead, let us focus on understanding the anomalies of 3I/ATLAS (as listed here), starting with its anti-tail jet. This visitor to our backyard is not a regular street cat since a tail appears to be emerging from its forehead.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1*LE3Xlzc3hNG5VDAGlDP8KQ.jpeg
(Image Credit: Chris Michel, National Academy of Sciences, 2023)

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSou

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By UAPResearcher
      Has anyone seen the new video shared by Elex Michaelson featuring a flying disc? It was obtained from Jeremy Corbell, who’s known for his work with UFO footage. The video showcases what appears to be a disc-shaped object, and it’s raising questions about the nature of UAP encounters.
      In the footage, the disc moves in a way that doesn’t seem typical for any known aircraft. Its dynamics and speed might suggest advanced technology, but without additional context, it’s hard to draw definite conclusions. Corbell has a history of presenting intriguing evidence, but this video alone doesn’t provide enough detail to ascertain the object's origin.
      Viewer reactions on the video have been mixed, with some expressing excitement about the footage and others remaining skeptical. It seems the community is divided between those who think this might be a significant piece of evidence and those who argue it could be misidentified phenomena. The lack of corroborating data or a clear identification leaves plenty of room for speculation.
      As we discuss this video, it’s important to consider the implications of such sightings. While it’s easy to jump to conclusions about advanced technology or extraterrestrial origins, we should also remember that misinterpretations can occur, especially with camera optics and atmospheric conditions. This need for careful analysis is crucial in the ongoing discussion around UAPs.
      What do you think this new footage tells us about the current state of UAP investigations? Are we progressing toward clearer answers, or are we still in the same place of uncertainty?
    • By UAPResearcher
      I recently came across a YouTube video where Matthew Brown, a well-known UFO whistleblower, shares some startling insights during an interview. He discusses revelations that might change our understanding of UAPs altogether. It's intriguing to see such direct commentary coming from someone with experience in the field.
      In the video, Patrick from the VETTED channel breaks down Brown's statements, which focus on the implications of recent UAP disclosures. While the specifics of these statements aren't laid out in detail in the provided notes, it’s suggested that Brown's perspective adds significant weight to ongoing discussions about UAP visibility and government transparency.
      One of the major points of interest is how Brown frames the conversation around UAPs. Instead of just adding to the chatter, he seems to hint at deeper layers of understanding that haven’t been fully explored. Given the history of UAP reports and the government’s fluctuating stance on their existence, this could be crucial for how the public perceives these encounters moving forward.
      However, what stands out is the lack of verifiable evidence presented in the summary notes. Brown’s claims are compelling, but without specific examples or case studies, it’s difficult to gauge their validity. This makes me wonder how much of what he says can be substantiated. His insights are valuable, but they also underscore the need for tangible proof in a field that is often marred by speculation.
      Furthermore, the comments from viewers seem to reflect a mix of skepticism and intrigue. Many are eager for more details, while others caution against jumping to conclusions without hard evidence. This is a critical point for anyone following the evolution of UAP discussions—balancing curiosity with a healthy skepticism is essential.
      As we wait for more concrete information, it raises an important question: how can we best separate genuine insights from speculative claims in the realm of UAPs? With figures like Matthew Brown speaking out, it’s crucial to critically assess the content and push for transparency in evidence. What do you think is the best approach for evaluating claims made by whistleblowers in this field?
    • By UAPResearcher
      The recent UFO Disclosure Forum held at the U.S. Capitol on October 4, 2026, featured a lineup of experts, lawmakers, and whistleblowers advocating for increased transparency regarding UAPs. A significant claim made during the forum was the suggestion that some UAP secrets could potentially be hidden by the Air Force and CIA, raising questions about the extent of classified information related to these phenomena. While this claim doesn't provide definitive evidence of wrongdoing, it opens the door for discussions about government accountability in UFO investigations.
      One notable point from the discussions was a reported surge in military UAP sightings each year. This trend has been documented in various reports, but the forum underscored a sense of urgency among participants to address the implications of these sightings. Lawmakers expressed their concerns about national security, particularly regarding a two-week UAP intrusion over Langley Air Force Base, emphasizing the need for more rigorous investigation and public disclosure.
      The forum also tackled the topic of recovered off-world technology, a claim that has circulated in the UAP community for years. While no concrete evidence was presented at the forum to substantiate this claim, the mere discussion of it signifies a shift in how lawmakers and experts are willing to approach the subject. This willingness to address potentially explosive topics reflects a broader cultural change regarding UAPs, but it also raises the question of whether the public can handle full disclosure if concrete evidence were to emerge.
      The discussions also touched on the psychological impacts of UAP disclosure. Expert panels examined how revealing the truth about UAPs might affect public perception and societal dynamics. A common concern expressed was the fear that full transparency could lead to widespread panic or anxiety. However, some participants argued that embracing the unknown could ultimately unite humanity against larger, global challenges rather than divide it.
      The forum concluded with a focus on the critical role of whistleblowers in UAP investigations. Several speakers highlighted the importance of protecting these individuals who come forward with information, suggesting that their contributions are essential for uncovering the truth. This emphasis on whistleblower protection indicates an acknowledgment of the risks faced by those who reveal classified information, which could encourage more individuals to step forward in the future.
      As the discourse around UAPs continues to evolve, the challenges of balancing security, transparency, and public reaction remain central. The daylong session at the Capitol demonstrated that while progress is being made in addressing UAPs, significant work lies ahead. The very fact that lawmakers are discussing these issues in such an open forum is a testament to the ongoing push for greater accountability and understanding.
      Given these discussions, one question that lingers is: How can authorities ensure that the public is both informed and prepared for the implications of full UAP disclosure?
    • By UAPResearcher
      In a recent YouTube video from Post Disclosure World, investigative journalist George Knapp discusses the intricate landscape of UFO disclosure. He addresses the various complexities involved, emphasizing the need for thorough analysis in understanding these phenomena. Knapp, known for his deep insights into the UFO field, presents a nuanced perspective that goes beyond surface-level observations.
      One key point Knapp makes is about the contrasting narratives surrounding UFO sightings and government responses. While many reports suggest increasing openness from officials, the actual details often remain shrouded in ambiguity. This discrepancy raises questions about what is being disclosed and what remains hidden. Knapp's analysis highlights this tension, suggesting that the public may not be receiving the full picture.
      Moreover, Knapp touches upon the implications of whistleblower testimonies. With several individuals coming forward to share their experiences, the credibility of these accounts plays a significant role in shaping public perception and trust. However, as Knapp points out, the lack of corroborating evidence for many claims can complicate the discourse. This brings us to the critical need for independent verification of such testimonies to strengthen the case for disclosure.
      Another intriguing aspect discussed in the video is the role of technology and its impact on UFO investigations. As new surveillance tools and data-gathering techniques emerge, the potential for uncovering more information about UAPs increases. However, Knapp raises concerns about whether these advancements are being effectively utilized by authorities, or if they are merely another layer of obfuscation in the ongoing dialogue about UFOs.
      In conclusion, Knapp's insights prompt a vital discussion about the future of UFO disclosure. Are we truly moving towards transparency, or are we simply witnessing a rebranding of long-held secrets? With so many unanswered questions, it becomes imperative to consider the evidence that supports or contradicts the narratives we are presented with. What do you think are the most significant barriers to achieving clarity in UFO disclosure today?
    • By UAPResearcher
      Danny's analysis in the video suggests that there are substantial roadblocks preventing UFO disclosure from gaining the momentum it needs within the White House. He highlights various factors that contribute to the current stagnation, suggesting that despite the increasing public interest and the release of documents by the Department of War (DOW), the government's response remains lackluster. This situation feels particularly pressing given the ongoing discussions about transparency and accountability in government concerning UAPs.
      One key point raised is the disconnect between public pressure for disclosure and the internal dynamics of government agencies. Danny argues that, although there are efforts to push for transparency, bureaucratic inertia and perhaps even political maneuvering may be holding back meaningful disclosure. This raises questions about who truly drives the conversation around UAPs and what influences their decisions.
      The video references the sixth tranche of records released by the DOW, which could provide more insight into past military encounters with UAPs. However, the effectiveness of these releases depends on how they are perceived and acted upon by policymakers. While documents can reveal historical data, their interpretation and the political context in which they are released are crucial for understanding their impact on public discourse.
      Danny emphasizes the need for a more coordinated approach within various government factions to facilitate open discussions about UAPs. This notion sparks thoughts about the past UAP hearings conducted by Congress, which aimed to create a unified stance on the phenomena. Yet, the lack of follow-up or actionable outcomes from those hearings raises doubts about whether the government is genuinely committed to transparency.
      As we consider the implications of Danny's insights, it's important to recognize the limitations of the evidence presented. While the video suggests that disclosure could realistically happen before January, it does not detail specific actions or timelines that could lead to such a development. The lack of concrete steps from the government leaves much open to interpretation, which is a significant barrier for those who seek clarity on the issue.
      As the conversation around UFOs continues to evolve, one must wonder: what specific actions should be prioritized to break the current stalemate in UAP disclosure? Moreover, how can we ensure that public interest translates into policy changes rather than mere rhetoric? These questions remain pivotal as we navigate the complexities of government transparency in relation to UFOs.
×
×
  • Create New...