Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
The Tunguska event was a mega explosion, which occurred near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in what is now Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia, on June 30, 1908. It is classified as an impact event even though it exploded in the sky rather than hit the surface with as a result that about 2,000 square km of forest was flattened. 

Tunguska%20event%20electric%20universe.jpg

No one disputes it occurred, but how it occurred is a heated controversy. 

Despite the best efforts of mainstream science, we still haven't gotten anything but ad hoc explanations that leave some inescapable facts shouting for attention. 

The event began around 7:15 in the morning of June 30th, 1908. A blue-white fireball that some say was brighter than the Sun raced across the sky and then exploded (with the power) of a 10 to 15 megaton hydrogen bomb. 

The shockwave alone was enough to knock people off their feet and break windows hundreds of kilometers away. The explosion though devastated 2,000 square kilometers, felling almost 60 million trees, and yet somehow left a ring of burned trees standing near the epicenter. Even stranger, several more unburned trees remained in the middle of those. 

Seismic stations across Europe and Asia felt the explosion, and even as far as Britain fluctuations of atmospheric pressure were detected. That pulse of air pressure circled the Earth twice. Astronomers observed a red-glowing haze in the upper atmosphere for several nights after, even if they didn't understand what had caused it. 

And then comes another oddity. Reports of an unusually bright nighttime sky begin coming out the night before the Tunguska event and several more unusually bright nights follow. For weeks, reports say the night sky was so bright you could read under it. Both the Smithsonian Astrophysical and Mount Wilson Observatories reported a decrease in atmospheric transparency that would persist for several months. 

Most astronomers today figure the destruction was caused by either a small comet or asteroid bursting a few miles off the surface, with estimates putting the object around 100 meters in diameter. According to the calculations of Christopher Chyba of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, only a stony meteorite would explode at 10 kilometers up where the Tunguska blast is thought to have occurred. 

However, a comet of that size would disintegrate much higher in the atmosphere, causing less damage on the ground. Yet, over a hundred years later scientists still argue over several unexplained facts and to this day no trace of the impacting object has ever been found. 

Andrei Ol’khovatov, an independent Russian physicist who was intrigued by the Tunguska then agrees that the impact theory leaves too many unanswered questions. 

He points out witnesses reporting strange weather and increased seismic activity in the area for days before the event. This absence of any coherent explanation has invited plenty of speculation from the mainstream. Everything from a miniature black hole passing through the earth to anti-matter bombs going off in the night. UFOs, extraterrestrial weaponry, even a theory about Tesla's death ray have been introduced to explain the unexplained. 

But guess what they left out - 'the electrical force'. The one single force that allows for a unified solution that doesn't need to leave out any fields of evidence. 

Proponents of the Electric Universe ask us to judge this perspective based on predictive success and their theories’ ability to explain all relevant data, without leaving a substantial collection of evidence on the cutting room floor, like the mainstream. So, let's pencil electricity into the equation and see what happens - the extraordinary power of a high-energy explosion above ground. The most likely origin of the object responsible for the Tunguska event was the short-period comet Encke acknowledged source of the Beta Taurid meteor shower which was at its peak on June 30th, 1908. 

In the Electric model, the energy released by a comet fragment when they encounter Earth isn't limited to the mass and kinetic energy of a fragment. Instead, it packs the entire punch of the charge differential between itself and the earth. 

What did they leave out? Electricity. Researchers who ignore the electrical force end up theorizing an object with grossly exaggerated mass and size, and these inaccuracies have made the search for fragments of the original bolide difficult. They're looking in the wrong places. Repeated testimony of strange sounds before the event 

In terms of the speed of sound in the earth's atmosphere, the reports of weird sounds in advance, might seem absurd. But not when you consider electrophonic sounds that are heard either before or during sightings of brilliant meteor fireballs up to a hundred kilometers distant. Electrophonic sounds are a direct conversion by transduction of very low frequency electromagnetic energy into sound, through a medium that can be as simple as a gold tooth or a pair of glasses. 

Reports of such unusual sounds connected with meteors, auroras, earthquakes, and even nuclear bomb tests, substantiate this effect. The easiest way to understand it, is as a natural resonance of extensive plasma discharge in earth's atmosphere, or underground in the case of earthquakes. In the case of the incoming comet, the body is electrified in respect to the earth. 

Plasma Sheath 

In our electric solar system, planets and comets all have a plasma sheath that isolates them electrically from the solar plasma. But when these plasma sheaths touch, the two bodies see each other electrically for the first time. 

Now consider that these comets have plasma sheaths that are millions of kilometers in diameter. Even at the incredible speeds they're traveling, their plasma sheaths reach us days in advance, causing electrical interaction with the earth long before any physical encounter. 

Strange Weather 

Reports of strange weather before the event.” In our electric solar system it's the flow of electric current between the planets and the solar plasma that primarily drive earth’s weather patterns. Seen in these terms, electrical disturbances resulting in unusual weather would be expected, even days before a comet's arrival.

Reports of strange seismic activity before the event 

New evidence is linking earthquakes to occurrences of underground lightning. The intrusion of even a minor electrical charged body approaching the earth, could certainly trigger earthquakes in the same way electrical sunspot activity does. 

Geomagnetic storms 

Geomagnetic effects before the event. Professor Weber of Kiel University observed unusual regular periodic deviations of the compass needle. An effect repeated each evening from the 27th through the 30th of June 1908. The recordings look like geomagnetic storms often caused by solar electrical activity. But in this instance, it was the approaching comet causing the disturbance. The duration of these storms indicate that comets are copious sources of electrons, meaning they carry substantial negative charge compared to the inner solar system and have a vastly greater influence than mere gravitational or inertial considerations would suggest. 

Global atmospheric pressure pulse

The earth's atmosphere forms the dielectric of a capacitor with the two plates being pressure pulses earth and the ionosphere. The comet’s electrical disturbances cause pressure pulses through the atmosphere, both before and when the comet arrives. Consider the giant ionospheric disturbance that accompanied the 9.3 magnitude Sumatra earthquake on December 26, 2004, where the ionosphere moved up and down by almost 40 kilometers. Such changes have been recorded in the atmosphere five to ten days before an earthquake. 

Missing crater

When a comet passes close to earth, the plasma discharge that takes place between them can cause the comet to fragment or burst from internal electrical stresses. Now these fragments can melt or vaporize in the intense plasma discharge leaving nothing left to create a crater on the ground. 

Interestingly, the Tunguska epicenter is over the top of a Triassic volcano. Volcanoes are the focus of electrical discharge activity and may retain electrical conductivity that differs from the surrounding crust, adding another credible argument that the blast was electrical. 

Absence of meteoric fragments

 If it was just the fire and air friction breaking the bolide apart, we'd expect to find its stony remains, but as noted above all this gets vaporized in the discharge. Also, ground zero has nothing to do with any impact or crater, but is instead the spot where a focused plasma discharge between earth and comet occurs, meaning most Standard Model researchers don't even know where to look. 

Instantaneous eruption of fire across hundreds of square kilometers 

A discharge at these levels would have been like nothing the locals had ever seen. Both regular radiation fires and electrically ignited ones would have erupted all over a wide area, all at the same time, setting it all ablaze. 

Frightful lightning and thunder in the midst of the firestorm. Saint Elmo's fire and ball lightning are generated at the earth's surface and the locals would have seen lightning snaking across a clear blue sky. 

Lightning 

Blasts of heat, along with a shock wave many kilometers from the explosion. Wherever the discharge touches down, there's intense heat and a blast, but these touchdown points are often far from the bolide’s track or the epicenter of the explosion. ”Presence of microscopic glassy spheres over a large area.” When those comet fragments vaporize, the explosion sprays glassy spherules outward from the discharge. 

Electrical fusing 

It's a common effect of lightning and yes easily demonstrated in the lab. After a hundred years, the experts are still debating if this was a comet or an asteroid that exploded over Tunguska. The comet camp points out cometary material found in a wide area, but the asteroid camp claim a fragile comet would get destroyed too high in the atmosphere. What neither side understands is that a comet is just an asteroid large enough to hold its own charge, while moving along a highly elliptical orbit through the Sun's electric field. There are no icy dirt balls. Both form the same way, and an asteroid that's big enough can become a comet simply by being knocked out of its regular circular orbit. 

The above theory proposed by the Electric Universe model of cosmology could be the answer to the question of what really caused the Tunguska event. It's electric! 


The Electric Universe Theory generally states that electricity is the engine behind a long list of natural and astrophysical spectacles. It supports the idea that invisible electricity powers surround our planet, our solar system, the galaxy and... everything and that cosmic occurrences are electrical in nature.  

 

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By SpaceObserver
      Hey everyone! I wanted to bring up that intriguing YouTube video titled 'Special Event Announcement (Aug. 14, 2026)' that I’m sure many of you have seen. The excitement surrounding missions like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) continues to build, and it seems like this upcoming event could be another significant moment for the astronomy community. I’m particularly curious about the hints dropped in the video regarding new findings related to exoplanets. It seems like every week we hear something new, and the advancements in our ability to study these distant worlds just keep getting better.
      One part of the video that caught my attention was the mention of potentially groundbreaking observations that could expand our understanding of planetary habitability. With the JWST capable of analyzing atmospheres and identifying chemical signatures that might indicate the presence of life, it feels like we're on the brink of discovering something monumental. The excitement isn’t just about what we might find, but also about how these discoveries could redefine our search for extraterrestrial life. I find it fascinating how the nuances of atmospheric composition can suggest whether an exoplanet may be habitable or not.
      Another point that had me thinking was the speculation about the data release from the recent survey missions. If the claims about new exoplanets are verified, it could open up entirely new avenues for astrobiology. It’s amazing to consider how many Earth-like planets are out there, and how many might have the conditions suitable for life as we know it, or even life we haven’t encountered yet. The uncertainty in this field is what keeps me engaged; every discovery seems to lead to more questions.
      I’m curious to hear your thoughts on the implications of these findings and whether you think they will have a significant impact on our understanding of life in the universe. Do you believe that we are close to confirming the existence of life beyond Earth? Also, are there any specific aspects of the upcoming event that you think warrant more attention? Looking forward to an engaging discussion around this exciting topic!
    • By MysteryFiles
      The recent updates from the European Space Agency regarding the Chelyabinsk meteor event have really caught my attention. It’s been over a decade since that massive bolide exploded over Russia, and yet we’re still uncovering new details. The latest analysis seems to suggest that the meteor was part of a larger family of asteroids, which raises questions about how many such fragments are out there and what threat they might pose.
      One thing that struck me was the sheer size of the explosion. It was more powerful than several kilotons of TNT, and yet it didn’t cause any fatalities. This makes me wonder about the effectiveness of our early warning systems. If a larger object were to head our way, would we be able to detect it in time?
      I’m also curious about the atmospheric effects it caused. The shockwave shattered windows and injured around 1,500 people, but what about the long-term environmental impact? Have there been any studies on how such events affect the atmosphere or climate in the aftermath? It seems like an area that deserves more attention.
      Then there’s the aspect of public perception. Events like this can lead to a mix of panic and fascination. I remember the media frenzy following the incident, with people speculating about alien technology or government cover-ups. It seems like the actual scientific findings get overshadowed by sensationalism. How can we better communicate the science behind such events to the public?
      It’s also fascinating to think about how much we’ve learned about asteroid composition and behavior since Chelyabinsk. The ESA’s continued studies can inform future missions, especially with initiatives like the Hera mission aiming to understand asteroid deflection techniques. What are your thoughts on the implications of these findings for planetary defense?
      As we delve deeper into the data, I can’t help but feel a mix of excitement and caution. The universe is a wild place, and we’re only just beginning to scratch the surface of what’s out there. What other unexplained phenomena from our past might still hold secrets waiting to be uncovered?
    • By DisclosureWatch
      As we approach the peak of the 2026 Perseids meteor shower, I can't help but wonder how this year's predictions stack up against previous years. The Perseids are usually a spectacular show, but it seems like we've had some variability in their intensity over recent years. Is anyone else curious about what this year's conditions might be? The forecasts suggest we could see a decent number of meteors per hour, especially with the Moon being a waning crescent.
      I've read that the optimal viewing times will be around the early morning hours, particularly after midnight. It’s also interesting to note that the shower is expected to peak around August 12th and 13th. I remember last year being slightly disappointing due to a bright moon, but this time we might have a better chance for clear skies and darker conditions which could enhance our viewing experience.
      Has anyone been tracking the weather patterns leading up to the shower? I always find it fascinating how local conditions can affect our ability to see these events. Also, what are your favorite spots for meteor watching? I’m planning on heading to a remote area away from city lights, but I’m open to suggestions.
      Additionally, is anyone planning to do any astrophotography during the shower? It’s been a while since I’ve attempted to capture meteors on camera, and I’d love to hear any tips or techniques that have worked well for others in the past.
      I’m particularly interested in how the evolution of celestial events like this can shift our understanding of other cosmic phenomena. The Perseids originate from the comet Swift-Tuttle, which has a 133-year orbit. It's intriguing to think about how this long cycle impacts our observations.
      Let’s share our experiences, predictions, and any preparatory tips for the upcoming meteor shower. I’m really looking forward to this year's event and hope to hear about everyone’s plans and expectations for the night!
    • By UAPResearcher
      I just read about a recent UAP encounter reported by a military pilot stationed at Nellis Air Force Base. According to the witness account, they observed an object that exhibited flight characteristics far beyond any known aircraft. The report mentioned rapid acceleration and sudden changes in direction that seemed to defy the laws of physics as we understand them.
      This encounter is particularly interesting because it came during a training exercise, and the object was picked up on radar. The pilot described the UAP as a shiny disc-like shape that seemed to hover at a relatively low altitude before darting away at high speed. I wonder if this incident is a part of a larger pattern of sightings in that area or if it stands alone.
      Nellis AFB has a history of UAP sightings, and it’s known for its connection to various military operations and testing programs. Given the base's reputation, it begs the question of whether this was a classified test of advanced technology or something else entirely. The lack of detailed follow-up reports from official sources is also telling.
      I’m curious about the implications of this sighting in relation to the recent UAP disclosure efforts. If military pilots are encountering these phenomena regularly, what does that mean for public transparency and understanding of UAPs? It almost feels like we’re only scratching the surface of what these encounters might reveal about our airspace and potential technologies.
      Has anyone else come across more details about this incident or similar cases at Nellis? Additionally, are there connections to previous sightings or documented patterns in this specific area? I think it would be great to compile a list of other known encounters to see if there are any correlations or patterns emerging.
      The more we share and discuss these sightings, the clearer the picture we can form about what's happening in our skies. I'm looking forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts and any additional information you might have on this or similar incidents.
    • By CosmicSignals
      With everything happening in 2026, it's hard not to notice the latest push from the Space Force regarding orbital tracking initiatives. They've been emphasizing their efforts to enhance space domain awareness, especially with the increasing number of satellites and potential near-Earth objects. But are these initiatives really as groundbreaking as they're being presented?
      One thing that stands out is the mention of new technologies for tracking unknown objects in orbit. The idea that we might have better capabilities to monitor not just what we know, but also the unexpected is intriguing. I wonder how much of this is driven by recent UAP reports, as there’s a clear need to understand what's up there, whether it’s man-made or something else entirely.
      Given the vastness of space, the challenge of distinguishing between ordinary objects and those that might pose a threat can't be underestimated. The Space Force has been vocal about its commitment to safeguarding our assets in space. Still, I can't shake the feeling that there might be more to unveil. Do these initiatives address the underlying issues effectively?
      I’m also curious about how these advancements will interact with existing technologies. For instance, how will this new tracking capability complement or enhance current satellite monitoring systems? It feels like there could be a significant leap in how we approach space traffic management, especially as we see an uptick in private companies launching their own satellites.
      Another factor worth considering is the implications for international collaboration. If the Space Force improves its orbital tracking and detection capabilities, will other countries feel compelled to enhance their own systems? The potential for a new arms race in space technology is something that lingers in the background, but I'm more interested in the scientific possibilities.
      All in all, while these initiatives sound promising, I wonder if they will deliver the level of innovation that we need. As we push further into the next era of space exploration, will the Space Force manage to keep pace with the rapid changes? I'm eager to see how this develops, but I think it’s essential to remain cautiously optimistic. What do you think about these new efforts by the Space Force? Are they a genuine step forward or just a way to keep up appearances?
×
×
  • Create New...