Jump to content

La NASA identifica causa de pérdida de material del escudo térmico de Orion de Artemis I


Recommended Posts

  • Publishers
Posted
jsc2024e044990~large.jpg?w=1920&h=1280&f
El 28 de junio de 2024, la nave espacial Orion de Artemis II es retirada de la Celda de Ensamblaje Final y Pruebas del Sistema (FAST, por sus siglas en inglés) y colocada en la cámara de altitud oeste dentro del Edificio de Operaciones y Revisión del Centro Espacial Kennedy de la NASA en Florida. Dentro de la cámara de altitud, la nave espacial se sometió a una serie de pruebas que simulaban las condiciones de vacío del espacio profundo.
Crédito de la foto: NASA / Rad Sinyak

Read this story in English here.

Tras extensos análisis y pruebas, la NASA ha identificado la causa técnica de la pérdida imprevista de material carbonizado en el escudo térmico de la nave espacial Orion de Artemis I.

Los ingenieros determinaron que, cuando Orion regresaba de su misión sin tripulación alrededor de la Luna, los gases generados dentro del material ablativo exterior del escudo térmico, denominado Avcoat, no pudieron ventilarse y disiparse como estaba previsto. Esto permitió que se acumulara presión y se produjeran grietas, lo que causó que parte del material carbonizado se desprendiera en varios lugares.

“Nuestros primeros vuelos de Artemis son una campaña de prueba, y el vuelo de prueba de Artemis I nos dio la oportunidad de comprobar nuestros sistemas en el entorno del espacio profundo antes de incorporar a la tripulación en futuras misiones”, dijo Amit Kshatriya, administrador asociado adjunto de la Oficina del programa De la Luna a Marte, en la sede de la NASA en Washington. “La investigación sobre el escudo térmico ayudó a garantizar que comprendiéramos completamente la causa y la naturaleza del problema, así como el riesgo que les pedimos a nuestras tripulaciones que asuman cuando emprendan su viaje a la Luna”.

Los hallazgos


Los equipos técnicos adoptaron un enfoque metódico para comprender e identificar el origen del problema de pérdida de material carbonizado, incluyendo el muestreo detallado del escudo térmico de Artemis I, la revisión de las imágenes y los datos de los sensores de la nave espacial, y pruebas y análisis exhaustivos en tierra.

Durante Artemis I, los ingenieros utilizaron la técnica de guiamiento de reentrada atmosférica doble para el regreso de Orion a la Tierra. Esta técnica ofrece más flexibilidad ya que amplía el alcance del vuelo de Orion después del punto de reentrada para llevarlo hasta un lugar de amerizaje en el océano Pacífico. Con esta maniobra, Orion se sumergió en la parte superior de la atmósfera de la Tierra y utilizó la resistencia atmosférica para reducir su velocidad. A continuación, Orion utilizó la sustentación aerodinámica de la cápsula para rebotar y salir de nuevo de la atmósfera, para luego volver a entrar en el descenso final con paracaídas para su amerizaje.

Utilizando los datos de la respuesta del material Avcoat de Artemis I, el equipo de investigación pudo simular el entorno de la trayectoria de entrada de Artemis I —una parte clave para comprender la causa del problema— dentro de la instalación de chorro en arco del Centro de Investigación Ames de la NASA en California. Observaron que, durante el período entre las inmersiones en la atmósfera, las tasas de calentamiento disminuyeron y la energía térmica se acumuló dentro del material Avcoat del escudo térmico. Esto condujo a la acumulación de gases que forman parte del proceso de ablación (desgaste) previsto. Debido a que el Avcoat no tenía “permeabilidad”, la presión interna se acumuló y produjo el agrietamiento y el desprendimiento desigual de la capa exterior.

Los equipos técnicos realizaron extensas pruebas en tierra para simular el fenómeno de rebote en la reentrada antes de la misión Artemis I. Sin embargo, hicieron pruebas a velocidades de calentamiento mucho más altas que las que la nave espacial experimentó durante su vuelo. Las altas velocidades de calentamiento puestas a prueba en tierra permitieron que el material carbonizado permeable se formara y se desgastara como estaba previsto, liberando la presión del gas. El calentamiento menos severo observado durante la reentrada real de Artemis I desaceleró el proceso de formación de material carbonizado, al tiempo que siguió creando gases en esta capa de material. La presión del gas se acumuló hasta el punto de agrietar el Avcoat y liberar partes de la capa carbonizada. Las mejoras recientes en la instalación de chorro en arco han permitido una reproducción más precisa de los entornos de vuelo registrados por Artemis I, de modo que este comportamiento de agrietamiento pudo demostrarse en pruebas en tierra.

Si bien Artemis I no estaba tripulado, los datos del vuelo mostraron que, si la tripulación hubiera estado a bordo, habría estado a salvo. Los datos de la temperatura de los sistemas del módulo de tripulación dentro de la cabina también estaban dentro de los límites y se mantenían estables, con temperaturas alrededor de los 24 grados centígrados (75 grados Fahrenheit). El desempeño del escudo térmico superó las expectativas.

Los ingenieros comprenden tanto el fenómeno material como el entorno con el que interactúan los materiales durante la entrada a la atmósfera. Al cambiar el material o el entorno, pueden predecir cómo responderá la nave espacial. Los equipos de la NASA acordaron por unanimidad que la agencia puede desarrollar un análisis de vuelo aceptable que mantenga a la tripulación segura utilizando el actual escudo térmico de Artemis II con cambios operativos para su entrada en la atmósfera.

El proceso de investigación de la NASA

Poco después de que los ingenieros de la NASA descubrieran las condiciones del escudo térmico de Artemis I, la agencia comenzó un extenso proceso de investigación, el cual contó con un equipo multidisciplinario de expertos en sistemas de protección térmica, aerotermodinámica, pruebas y análisis térmicos, análisis de estrés (fatiga de materiales), pruebas y análisis de materiales, y muchos otros campos técnicos relacionados. El Centro de Ingeniería y Seguridad de la NASA también participó para aportar su experiencia técnica, incluyendo evaluación no destructiva, análisis térmico y estructural, análisis de árbol de fallas y otros métodos de respaldo de las pruebas.

“Nos tomamos muy en serio nuestro proceso de investigación del escudo térmico, con la seguridad de la tripulación como la fuerza impulsora que mueve esta investigación”, dijo Howard Hu, gerente del Programa Orion del Centro Espacial Johnson de la NASA en Houston. “El proceso fue extenso. Le dimos al equipo el tiempo necesario para investigar todas las causas posibles, y trabajaron incansablemente para asegurarse de que entendiéramos el fenómeno y los pasos necesarios para mitigar este problema en futuras misiones”.

El escudo térmico de Artemis I estaba muy cargado de instrumentos para este vuelo, e incluía sensores de presión, extensómetros y termopares a diferentes profundidades del material ablativo. Los datos de estos instrumentos acrecentaron el análisis de muestras físicas, lo que permitió al equipo validar modelos informáticos, crear reconstrucciones de entornos, proporcionar perfiles de temperatura interna y dar información sobre el momento de la pérdida de material carbonizado.

Alrededor de 200 muestras de Avcoat fueron extraídas del escudo térmico de Artemis I en el Centro de Vuelo Espacial Marshall de la NASA en Alabama para su análisis e inspección. El equipo llevó a cabo una evaluación no destructiva para “ver” dentro del escudo térmico.

Uno de los hallazgos más importantes que arrojó el examen de estas muestras fue que algunas superficies en la zona del Avcoat permeable, las cuales habían sido identificadas antes del vuelo, no sufrieron agrietamiento ni pérdida de material carbonizado. Dado que estas superficies eran permeables al comienzo de la entrada en la atmósfera, los gases producidos por la ablación pudieron ventilarse adecuadamente, eliminando la acumulación de la presión, el agrietamiento y la pérdida de material carbonizado.

Los ingenieros hicieron ocho campañas separadas de pruebas térmicas posteriores al vuelo para respaldar el análisis del origen de estas condiciones, y completaron 121 pruebas individuales. Estas pruebas fueron llevadas a cabo en instalaciones en diferentes lugares de Estados Unidos que cuentan con capacidades únicas, entre ellas: la Instalación de Calentamiento Aerodinámico en el Complejo de Chorro en Arco del centro Ames, para poner a prueba perfiles de calentamiento convectivo con diversos gases de prueba; el Laboratorio de Evaluación de Materiales Endurecidos por Láser en la Base de la Fuerza Aérea Patterson-Wright en Ohio, con el fin de poner a prueba perfiles de calentamiento radiativo y proporcionar radiografías en tiempo real; y la Instalación de Calentamiento por Interacción del centro Ames, para poner a prueba perfiles combinados de calentamiento convectivo y radiativo en el aire en bloques completos, esto es, aplicando todas las pruebas en cada bloque de material.

Los expertos en aerotermia también completaron dos campañas de pruebas en el túnel de viento hipersónico del Centro de Investigación Langley de la NASA en Virginia y en las instalaciones de pruebas aerodinámicas del CUBRC en Buffalo, Nueva York, para realizar pruebas con una diversidad de configuraciones de pérdida de material carbonizado, y mejorar y validar los modelos analíticos. También se realizaron pruebas de permeabilidad en el centro Kratos en Alabama, en la Universidad de Kentucky y en el centro Ames para caracterizar aún mejor el volumen elemental y la porosidad del Avcoat. La instalación de pruebas del centro de investigaciones Advanced Light Source, una instalación para usuarios científicos del Departamento de Energía de Estados Unidos en el Laboratorio Nacional Lawrence Berkeley, también fue utilizada por los ingenieros para examinar el comportamiento del calentamiento del Avcoat a nivel microestructural.

En la primavera de 2024, la NASA creó un equipo de revisión independiente que realizó una revisión exhaustiva del proceso de investigación, los hallazgos y los resultados de la agencia. La revisión independiente fue dirigida por Paul Hill, un exdirectivo de la NASA que se desempeñó como director principal de vuelo del transbordador espacial para el programa Return to Flight (Regreso a los vuelos) después del accidente del Columbia, quien también dirigió la Dirección de Operaciones de Misiones de la NASA y es miembro actual del Panel Asesor de Seguridad Aeroespacial de la agencia. La revisión se llevó a cabo durante un período de tres meses a fin de evaluar las condiciones del escudo térmico posteriores al vuelo, los datos del entorno para la entrada a la atmósfera, la respuesta térmica del material ablativo y el avance de las investigaciones de la NASA. El equipo de revisión estuvo de acuerdo con los hallazgos de la NASA sobre la causa técnica del comportamiento físico del escudo térmico.

Avances en el escudo térmico

Al saber que la permeabilidad de Avcoat es un parámetro clave para evitar o minimizar la pérdida de material carbonizado, la NASA tiene la información correcta para garantizar la seguridad de la tripulación y mejorar el desempeño de los futuros escudos térmicos del programa Artemis. A lo largo de su historia, la NASA ha aprendido de cada uno de sus vuelos e incorporado mejoras en el hardware y las operaciones. Los datos recopilados a lo largo del vuelo de prueba de Artemis I han proporcionado a los ingenieros información valiosísima para guiar futuros diseños y refinamientos. Los datos de desempeño del vuelo de retorno lunar y un sólido programa de calificación de pruebas en tierra, mejorado después de la experiencia del vuelo de Artemis I, están respaldando las mejoras en la producción del escudo térmico de Orion. Los futuros escudos térmicos para el regreso de Orion en las misiones de alunizaje de Artemis están en producción para lograr una uniformidad y permeabilidad consistente. El programa de calificación se está completando actualmente, junto con la producción de bloques de Avcoat más permeables, en la Instalación de Ensamblaje Michoud de la NASA en Nueva Orleans.

Para obtener más información sobre las campañas Artemis de la NASA, visita el sitio web (en inglés):

https://www.nasa.gov/artemis

-fin-


Meira Bernstein / Rachel Kraft / María José Viñas
Sede, Washington
202-358-1600
meira.b.bernstein@nasa.gov / rachel.h.kraft@nasa.gov / maria-jose.vinasgarcia@nasa.gov

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By NASA
      Former Johnson Director Jefferson Howell July 3, 2025
      Jefferson Davis Howell, Jr., former director of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, died July 2, in Bee Cave, Texas. He was 85 years old.
      Howell was a champion of the construction of the International Space Station, working on a deadline to complete the orbiting lab by 2004. He oversaw four space shuttle crews delivering equipment and hardware to reach that goal. He also served as director during a pivotal moment for the agency: the loss of STS-107 and the crew of space shuttle Columbia. He made it his personal responsibility to meet with the families, look after them, and attend memorial services, all while keeping the families informed of the accident investigation as it unfolded.
      “Gen. Howell led NASA Johnson through one of the most difficult chapters in our history, following the loss of Columbia and her crew,” said acting associate administrator Vanessa Wyche. “He brought strength and steady direction, guiding the workforce with clarity and compassion. He cared deeply for the people behind the mission and shared his leadership skills generously with the team. We extend our heartfelt condolences to his family and all who knew and loved him.”
      At the time of his selection as director, he was serving as senior vice president with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) as the program manager for the safety, reliability, and quality assurance contract at Johnson. Following the accident, he made it his mission to improve the relationship between the civil servant and contractor workforce. He left his position and the agency, in October 2005, shortly after the Return-to-Flight mission of STS-114.
      “General Howell stepped into leadership at Johnson during a pivotal time, as the International Space Station was just beginning to take shape. He led and supported NASA’s successes not only in space but here on the ground — helping to strengthen the center’s culture and offering guidance through both triumph and tragedy,” said Steve Koerner, Johnson Space Center’s acting director. “On behalf of NASA’s Johnson Space Center, we offer our deepest sympathies to his family, friends, and all those who had the privilege of working alongside him. The impact of his legacy will continue to shape Johnson for decades to come.”
      The Victoria, Texas, native was a retired lieutenant general in the U.S. Marine Corps with a decorated military career prior to his service at NASA. He flew more than 300 combat missions in Vietnam and Thailand.
      Howell is survived by his wife Janel and two children. A tree dedication will be held at NASA Johnson’s memorial grove in the coming year.
      -end-
      Chelsey Ballarte
      Johnson Space Center, Houston
      281-483-5111
      chelsey.n.ballarte@nasa.gov
      View the full article
    • By NASA
      4 min read
      Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)
      Since launching in 2023, NASA’s Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution mission, or TEMPO, has been measuring the quality of the air we breathe from 22,000 miles above the ground. June 19 marked the successful completion of TEMPO’s 20-month-long initial prime mission, and based on the quality of measurements to date, the mission has been extended through at least September 2026. The TEMPO mission is NASA’s first to use a spectrometer to gather hourly air quality data continuously over North America during daytime hours. It can see details down to just a few square miles, a significant advancement over previous satellites.
      “NASA satellites have a long history of missions lasting well beyond the primary mission timeline. While TEMPO has completed its primary mission, the life for TEMPO is far from over,” said Laura Judd, research physical scientist and TEMPO science team member at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. “It is a big jump going from once-daily images prior to this mission to hourly data. We are continually learning how to use this data to interpret how emissions change over time and how to track anomalous events, such as smoggy days in cities or the transport of wildfire smoke.” 
      To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
      By measuring nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and formaldehyde (HCHO), TEMPO can derive the presence of near-surface ozone. On Aug. 2, 2024 over Houston, TEMPO observed exceptionally high ozone levels in the area. On the left, NO2 builds up in the atmosphere over the city and over the Houston Ship Channel. On the right, formaldehyde levels are seen reaching a peak in the early afternoon. Formaldehyde is largely formed through the oxidation of hydrocarbons, an ingredient of ozone production, such as those that can be emitted by petrochemical facilities found in the Houston Ship Channel. Trent Schindler/NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio When air quality is altered by smog, wildfire smoke, dust, or emissions from vehicle traffic and power plants, TEMPO detects the trace gases that come with those effects. These include nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and formaldehyde in the troposphere, the lowest layer of Earth’s atmosphere.
      “A major breakthrough during the primary mission has been the successful test of data delivery in under three hours with the help of NASA’s Satellite Needs Working Group. This information empowers decision-makers and first responders to issue timely air quality warnings and help the public reduce outdoor exposure during times of higher pollution,” said Hazem Mahmoud, lead data scientist at NASA’s Atmospheric Science Data Center located at Langley Research Center.
      …the substantial demand for TEMPO's data underscores its critical role…
      hazem mahmoud
      NASA Data Scientist
      TEMPO data is archived and distributed freely through the Atmospheric Science Data Center. “The TEMPO mission has set a groundbreaking record as the first mission to surpass two petabytes, or 2 million gigabytes, of data downloads within a single year,” said Mahmoud. “With over 800 unique users, the substantial demand for TEMPO’s data underscores its critical role and the immense value it provides to the scientific community and beyond.” Air quality forecasters, atmospheric scientists, and health researchers make up the bulk of the data users so far.
      To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
      On April 14, strong winds triggered the formation of a huge dust storm in the U.S. central plains and fueled the ignition of grassland fires in Oklahoma. On the left, the NO2 plumes originating from the grassland fires are tracked hour-by-hour by TEMPO. Smoke can be discerned from dust as a source since dust is not a source of NO2. The animation on the right shows the ultraviolet (UV) aerosol index, which indicates particulates in the atmosphere that absorb UV light, such as dust and smoke. Trent Schindler/NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio The TEMPO mission is a collaboration between NASA and the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, whose Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian oversees daily operations of the TEMPO instrument and produces data products through its Instrument Operations Center.
      Datasets from TEMPO will be expanded through collaborations with partner agencies like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which is deriving aerosol products that can distinguish between smoke and dust particles and offer insights into their altitude and concentration.
      To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
      On May 5, TEMPO measured NO2 emissions over the Twin Cities in the center of Minnesota during morning rush hour. The NO2 increases seen mid-day through the early evening hours are illustrated by the red and black shaded areas at the Red River Valley along the North Dakota state line. These levels are driven by emissions from the soils in agriculturally rich areas. Agricultural soil emissions are influenced by environmental factors like temperature and moisture as well as fertilizer application. Small fires and enhancements from mining activities can also be seen popping up across the region through the afternoon.Trent Schindler/NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio “These datasets are being used to inform the public of rush-hour pollution, air quality alerts, and the movement of smoke from forest fires,” said Xiong Liu, TEMPO’s principal investigator at the Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian. “The library will soon grow with the important addition of aerosol products. Users will be able to use these expanded TEMPO products for air quality monitoring, improving forecast models, deriving pollutant amounts in emissions and many other science applications.”
      The TEMPO mission detects and highlights movement of smoke originating from fires burning in Manitoba on June 2. Seen in purple hues are observations made by TEMPO in the ultraviolet spectrum compared to Advanced Baseline Imagers (ABIs) on NOAA’s GOES-R series of weather satellites that do not have the needed spectral coverage. The NOAA GOES-R data paired with NASA’s TEMPO data enhance state and local agencies’ ability to provide near-real-time smoke and dust impacts in local air quality forecasts.NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research “The TEMPO data validation has truly been a community effort with over 20 agencies at the federal and international level, as well as a community of over 200 scientists at research and academic institutions,” Judd added. “I look forward to seeing how TEMPO data will help close knowledge gaps about the timing, sources, and evolution of air pollution from this unprecedented space-based view.”
      An agency review will take place in the fall to assess TEMPO’s achievements and extended mission goals and identify lessons learned that can be applied to future missions.
      The TEMPO mission is part of NASA’s Earth Venture Instrument program, which includes small, targeted science investigations designed to complement NASA’s larger research missions. The instrument also forms part of a virtual constellation of air quality monitors for the Northern Hemisphere which includes South Korea’s Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer and ESA’s (European Space Agency) Sentinel-4 satellite. TEMPO was built by BAE Systems Inc., Space & Mission Systems (formerly Ball Aerospace). It flies onboard the Intelsat 40e satellite built by Maxar Technologies. The TEMPO Instrument Operations Center and the Science Data Processing Center are operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, part of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian in Cambridge.


      For more information about the TEMPO instrument and mission, visit:
      https://science.nasa.gov/mission/tempo/

      About the Author
      Charles G. Hatfield
      Science Public Affairs Officer, NASA Langley Research Center
      Share
      Details
      Last Updated Jul 03, 2025 LocationNASA Langley Research Center Related Terms
      Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) Earth Earth Science Earth Science Division General Langley Research Center Missions Science Mission Directorate Explore More
      2 min read Hubble Observations Give “Missing” Globular Cluster Time to Shine
      A previously unexplored globular cluster glitters with multicolored stars in this NASA Hubble Space Telescope…
      Article 15 minutes ago 5 min read NASA Advances Pressure Sensitive Paint Research Capability
      Article 1 hour ago 5 min read How NASA’s SPHEREx Mission Will Share Its All-Sky Map With the World 
      NASA’s newest astrophysics space telescope launched in March on a mission to create an all-sky…
      Article 1 day ago Keep Exploring Discover More Topics From NASA
      Missions
      Humans in Space
      Climate Change
      Solar System
      View the full article
    • By NASA
      5 min read
      Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)
      The Swept Wing Flow Test model, known as SWiFT, with pressure sensitive paint applied, sports a pink glow under ultraviolet lights while tested during 2023 in a NASA wind tunnel at Langley Research Center in Virginia.NASA / Dave Bowman Many of us grew up using paint-by-number sets to create beautiful color pictures.
      For years now, NASA engineers studying aircraft and rocket designs in wind tunnels have flipped that childhood pastime, using computers to generate images from “numbers-by-paint” – pressure sensitive paint (PSP), that is.
      Now, advances in the use of high-speed cameras, supercomputers, and even more sensitive PSP have made this numbers-by-paint process 10,000 times faster while creating engineering visuals with 1,000 times higher resolution.
      So, what’s the big difference exactly between the “old” capability in use at NASA for more than a decade and the “new?”
      “The key is found by adding a single word in front of PSP, namely ‘unsteady’ pressure sensitive paint, or uPSP,” said E. Lara Lash, an aerospace engineer from NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley.
      With PSP, NASA researchers study the large-scale effects of relatively smooth air flowing over the wings and body of aircraft. Now with uPSP, they are able to see in finer detail what happens when more turbulent air is present – faster and better than ever before.
      In some cases with the new capability, researchers can get their hands on the wind tunnel data they’re looking for within 20 minutes. That’s quick enough to allow engineers to adjust their testing in real time.
      Usually, researchers record wind tunnel data and then take it back to their labs to decipher days or weeks later. If they find they need more data, it can take additional weeks or even months to wait in line for another turn in the wind tunnel.
      “The result of these improvements provides a data product that is immediately useful to aerodynamic engineers, structural engineers, or engineers from other disciplines,” Lash said.
      Robert Pearce, NASA’s associate administrator for aeronautics, who recently saw a demonstration of uPSP-generated data displayed at Ames, hailed the new tool as a national asset that will be available to researchers all over the country.
      “It’s a unique NASA innovation that isn’t offered anywhere else,” Pearce said. “It will help us maintain NASA’s world leadership in wind tunnel capabilities.”
      A technician sprays unsteady pressure sensitive paint onto the surface of a small model of the Space Launch System in preparation for testing in a NASA wind tunnel.NASA / Dave Bowman How it Works
      With both PSP and uPSP, a unique paint is applied to scale models of aircraft or rockets, which are mounted in wind tunnels equipped with specific types of lights and cameras.
      When illuminated during tests, the paint’s color brightness changes depending on the levels of pressure the model experiences as currents of air rush by. Darker shades mean higher pressure; lighter shades mean lower pressure.
      Cameras capture the brightness intensity and a supercomputer turns that information into a set of numbers representing pressure values, which are made available to engineers to study and glean what truths they can about the vehicle design’s structural integrity.
      “Aerodynamic forces can vibrate different parts of the vehicle to different degrees,” Lash said. “Vibrations could damage what the vehicle is carrying or can even lead to the vehicle tearing itself apart. The data we get through this process can help us prevent that.”
      Traditionally, pressure readings are taken using sensors connected to little plastic tubes strung through a model’s interior and poking up through small holes in key places, such as along the surface of a wing or the fuselage. 
      Each point provides a single pressure reading. Engineers must use mathematical models to estimate the pressure values between the individual sensors.
      With PSP, there is no need to estimate the numbers. Because the paint covers the entire model, its brightness as seen by the cameras reveals the pressure values over the whole surface.
      A four-percent scale model of the Space Launch System rocket is tested in 2017 using unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint inside the 11-foot by 11-foot Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California.NASA / Dominic Hart Making it Better
      The introduction, testing, and availability of uPSP is the result of a successful five-year-long effort, begun in 2019, in which researchers challenged themselves to significantly improve the PSP’s capability with its associated cameras and computers.
      The NASA team’s desire was to develop and demonstrate a better process of acquiring, processing, and visualizing data using a properly equipped wind tunnel and supercomputer, then make the tool available at NASA wind tunnels across the country.
      The focus during a capability challenge was on NASA’s Unitary Plan Facility’s 11-foot transonic wind tunnel, which the team connected to the nearby NASA Advanced Supercomputing Facility, both located at Ames.
      Inside the wind tunnel, a scale model of NASA’s Space Launch System rocket served as the primary test subject during the challenge period.
      Now that the agency has completed its Artemis I uncrewed lunar flight test mission, researchers can match the flight-recorded data with the wind tunnel data to see how well reality and predictions compare.
      With the capability challenge officially completed at the end of 2024, the uPSP team is planning to deploy it to other wind tunnels and engage with potential users with interests in aeronautics or spaceflight.
      “This is a NASA capability that we have, not only for use within the agency, but one that we can offer industry, academia, and other government agencies to come in and do research using these new tools,” Lash said.
      NASA’s Aerosciences Evaluation and Test Capabilities portfolio office, an organization managed under the agency’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, oversaw the development of the uPSP capability.
      Watch this uPSP Video
      About the Author
      Jim Banke
      Managing Editor/Senior WriterJim Banke is a veteran aviation and aerospace communicator with more than 40 years of experience as a writer, producer, consultant, and project manager based at Cape Canaveral, Florida. He is part of NASA Aeronautics' Strategic Communications Team and is Managing Editor for the Aeronautics topic on the NASA website.
      Facebook logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es @NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es Instagram logo @NASA@NASAaero@NASA_es Linkedin logo @NASA Explore More
      6 min read By Air and by Sea: Validating NASA’s PACE Ocean Color Instrument
      Article 1 week ago 3 min read NASA Intern Took Career from Car Engines to Cockpits
      Article 1 week ago 4 min read NASA Tech to Use Moonlight to Enhance Measurements from Space
      Article 2 weeks ago Keep Exploring Discover More Topics From NASA
      Missions
      Artemis
      Aeronautics STEM
      Explore NASA’s History
      Share
      Details
      Last Updated Jul 03, 2025 EditorJim BankeContactJim Bankejim.banke@nasa.gov Related Terms
      Aeronautics Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate Aerosciences Evaluation Test Capabilities Ames Research Center Flight Innovation Glenn Research Center Langley Research Center Transformational Tools Technologies
      View the full article
    • By NASA
      Explore Webb Webb News Latest News Latest Images Webb’s Blog Awards X (offsite – login reqd) Instagram (offsite – login reqd) Facebook (offsite- login reqd) Youtube (offsite) Overview About Who is James Webb? Fact Sheet Impacts+Benefits FAQ Science Overview and Goals Early Universe Galaxies Over Time Star Lifecycle Other Worlds Observatory Overview Launch Deployment Orbit Mirrors Sunshield Instrument: NIRCam Instrument: MIRI Instrument: NIRSpec Instrument: FGS/NIRISS Optical Telescope Element Backplane Spacecraft Bus Instrument Module Multimedia About Webb Images Images Videos What is Webb Observing? 3d Webb in 3d Solar System Podcasts Webb Image Sonifications Webb’s First Images Team International Team People Of Webb More For the Media For Scientists For Educators For Fun/Learning Since July 2022, NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has been unwaveringly focused on our universe. With its unprecedented power to detect and analyze otherwise invisible infrared light, Webb is making observations that were once impossible, changing our view of the cosmos from the most distant galaxies to our own solar system.
      Webb was built with the promise of revolutionizing astronomy, of rewriting the textbooks. And by any measure, it has more than lived up to the hype — exceeding expectations to a degree that scientists had not dared imagine. Since science operations began, Webb has completed more than 860 scientific programs, with one-quarter of its time dedicated to imaging and three-quarters to spectroscopy. In just three years, it has collected nearly 550 terabytes of data, yielding more than 1,600 research papers, with intriguing results too numerous to list and a host of new questions to answer.
      Here are just a few noteworthy examples.
      1. The universe evolved significantly faster than we previously thought.
      Webb was specifically designed to observe “cosmic dawn,” a time during the first billion years of the universe when the first stars and galaxies were forming. What we expected to see were a few faint galaxies, hints of what would become the galaxies we see nearby.
      Instead, Webb has revealed surprisingly bright galaxies that developed within 300 million years of the big bang; galaxies with black holes that seem far too massive for their age; and an infant Milky Way-type galaxy that existed when the universe was just 600 million years old. Webb has observed galaxies that already “turned off” and stopped forming stars within a billion years of the big bang, as well as those that developed quickly into modern-looking “grand design” spirals within 1.5 billion years.
      Hundreds of millions of years might not seem quick for a growth spurt, but keep in mind that the universe formed in the big bang roughly 13.8 billion years ago. If you were to cram all of cosmic time into one year, the most distant of these galaxies would have matured within the first couple of weeks, rapidly forming multiple generations of stars and enriching the universe with the elements we see today.
      Image: JADES deep field
      A near-infrared image from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope shows a region known as the JADES Deep Field. Tens of thousands of galaxies are visible in this tiny patch of sky, including Little Red Dots and hundreds of galaxies that existed more than 13.2 billion years ago, when the universe was less than 600 million years old. Webb also spotted roughly 80 ancient supernovae, many of which exploded when the universe was less than 2 billion years old. This is ten times more supernovae than had ever been discovered before in the early universe. Comparing these supernovae from the distant past with those in the more recent, nearby universe helps us understand how stars in these early times formed, lived, and died, seeding space with the elements for new generations of stars and their planets. NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, JADES Collaboration 2. Deep space is scattered with enigmatic “Little Red Dots.”
      Webb has revealed a new type of galaxy: a distant population of mysteriously compact, bright, red galaxies dubbed Little Red Dots. What makes Little Red Dots so bright and so red? Are they lit up by dense groupings of unusually bright stars or by gas spiraling into a supermassive black hole, or both? And whatever happened to them? Little Red Dots seem to have appeared in the universe around 600 million years after the big bang (13.2 billion years ago), and rapidly declined in number less than a billion years later. Did they evolve into something else? If so, how? Webb is probing Little Red Dots in more detail to answer these questions.
      3. Pulsating stars and a triply lensed supernova are further evidence that the “Hubble Tension” is real.
      How fast is the universe expanding? It’s hard to say because different ways of calculating the current expansion rate yield different results — a dilemma known as the Hubble Tension. Are these differences just a result of measurement errors, or is there something weird going on in the universe? So far, Webb data indicates that the Hubble Tension is not caused by measurement errors. Webb was able to distinguish pulsating stars from nearby stars in a crowded field, ensuring that the measurements weren’t contaminated by extra light. Webb also discovered a distant, gravitationally lensed supernova whose image appears in three different locations and at three different times during its explosion. Calculating the expansion rate based on the brightness of the supernova at these three different times provides an independent check on measurements made using other techniques. Until the matter of the Hubble Tension is settled, Webb will continue measuring different objects and exploring new methods.
      4. Webb has found surprisingly rich and varied atmospheres on gas giants orbiting distant stars.
      While NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope made the first detection of gases in the atmosphere of a gas giant exoplanet (a planet outside our solar system), Webb has taken studies to an entirely new level. Webb has revealed a rich cocktail of chemicals, including hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, carbon dioxide, methane, and sulfur dioxide — none of which had been clearly detected in an atmosphere outside our solar system before. Webb has also been able to examine exotic climates of gas giants as never before, detecting flakes of silica “snow” in the skies of the puffy, searing-hot gas giant WASP-17 b, for example, and measuring differences in temperature and cloud cover between the permanent morning and evening skies of WASP-39 b.
      Image: Spectrum of WASP-107 b
      A transmission spectrum of the “warm Neptune” exoplanet WASP-107 b captured by NASA’s Hubble and Webb space telescopes, shows clear evidence for water, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, and ammonia in the planet’s atmosphere. These measurements allowed researchers to estimate the interior temperature and mass of the core of the planet, as well as understand the chemistry and dynamics of the atmosphere. NASA, ESA, CSA, Ralf Crawford (STScI) 5. A rocky planet 40 light-years from Earth may have an atmosphere fed by gas bubbling up from its lava-covered surface.
      Detecting, let alone analyzing, a thin layer of gas surrounding a small rocky planet is no easy feat, but Webb’s extraordinary ability to measure extremely subtle changes in the brightness of infrared light makes it possible. So far, Webb has been able to rule out significant atmosphere on a number of rocky planets, and has found tantalizing signs of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide on 55 Cancri e, a lava world that orbits a Sun-like star. With findings like these, Webb is laying the groundwork for NASA’s future Habitable Worlds Observatory, which will be the first mission purpose-built to directly image and search for life on Earth-like planets around Sun-like stars.
      6. Webb exposes the skeletal structure of nearby spiral galaxies in mesmerizing detail.
      We already knew that galaxies are collections of stars, planets, dust, gas, dark matter, and black holes: cosmic cities where stars form, live, die, and are recycled into the next generation. But we had never been able to see the structure of a galaxy and the interactions between stars and their environment in such detail. Webb’s infrared vision reveals filaments of dust that trace the spiral arms, old star clusters that make up galactic cores, newly forming stars still encased in dense cocoons of glowing dust and gas, and clusters of hot young stars carving enormous cavities in the dust. It also elucidates how stellar winds and explosions actively reshape their galactic homes.
      Image: PHANGS Phantom Galaxy (M74/NGC 628)
      A near- to mid-infrared image from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope highlights details in the complex structure of a nearby galaxy that are invisible to other telescopes. The image of NGC 628, also known as the Phantom Galaxy, shows spiral arms with lanes of warm dust (represented in red), knots of glowing gas (orange-yellow), and giant bubbles (black) carved by hot, young stars. The dust-free core of the galaxy is filled with older, cooler stars (blue). NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Janice Lee (STScI), Thomas Williams (Oxford), PHANGS team 7. It can be hard to tell the difference between a brown dwarf and a rogue planet.
      Brown dwarfs form like stars, but are not dense or hot enough to fuse hydrogen in their cores like stars do. Rogue planets form like other planets, but have been ejected from their system and no longer orbit a star. Webb has spotted hundreds of brown-dwarf-like objects in the Milky Way, and has even detected some candidates in a neighboring galaxy. But some of these objects are so small — just a few times the mass of Jupiter — that it is hard to figure out how they formed. Are they free-floating gas giant planets instead? What is the least amount of material needed to form a brown dwarf or a star? We’re not sure yet, but thanks to three years of Webb observations, we now know there is a continuum of objects from planets to brown dwarfs to stars.
      8. Some planets might be able to survive the death of their star.
      When a star like our Sun dies, it swells up to form a red giant large enough to engulf nearby planets. It then sheds its outer layers, leaving behind a super-hot core known as a white dwarf. Is there a safe distance that planets can survive this process? Webb might have found some planets orbiting white dwarfs. If these candidates are confirmed, it would mean that it is possible for planets to survive the death of their star, remaining in orbit around the slowly cooling stellar ember.
      9. Saturn’s water supply is fed by a giant fountain of vapor spewing from Enceladus.
      Among the icy “ocean worlds” of our solar system, Saturn’s moon Enceladus might be the most intriguing. NASA’s Cassini mission first detected water plumes coming out of its southern pole. But only Webb could reveal the plume’s true scale as a vast cloud spanning more than 6,000 miles, about 20 times wider than Enceladus itself. This water spreads out into a donut-shaped torus encircling Saturn beyond the rings that are visible in backyard telescopes. While a fraction of the water stays in that ring, the majority of it spreads throughout the Saturnian system, even raining down onto the planet itself. Webb’s unique observations of rings, auroras, clouds, winds, ices, gases, and other materials and phenomena in the solar system are helping us better understand what our cosmic neighborhood is made of and how it has changed over time.
      Video: Water plume and torus from Enceladus
      A combination of images and spectra captured by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope show a giant plume of water jetting out from the south pole of Saturn’s moon Enceladus, creating a donut-shaped ring of water around the planet.
      Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, G. Villanueva (NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center), A. Pagan (STScI), L. Hustak (STScI) 10. Webb can size up asteroids that may be headed for Earth.
      In 2024 astronomers discovered an asteroid that, based on preliminary calculations, had a chance of hitting Earth. Such potentially hazardous asteroids become an immediate focus of attention, and Webb was uniquely able to measure the object, which turned out to be the size of a 15-story building. While this particular asteroid is no longer considered a threat to Earth, the study demonstrated Webb’s ability to assess the hazard.
      Webb also provided support for NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission, which deliberately smashed into the Didymos binary asteroid system, showing that a planned impact could deflect an asteroid on a collision course with Earth. Both Webb and Hubble observed the impact, serving witness to the resulting spray of material that was ejected. Webb’s spectroscopic observations of the system confirmed that the composition of the asteroids is probably typical of those that could threaten Earth.
      —-
      In just three years of operations, Webb has brought the distant universe into focus, revealing unexpectedly bright and numerous galaxies. It has unveiled new stars in their dusty cocoons, remains of exploded stars, and skeletons of entire galaxies. It has studied weather on gas giants, and hunted for atmospheres on rocky planets. And it has provided new insights into the residents of our own solar system.
      But this is only the beginning. Engineers estimate that Webb has enough fuel to continue observing for at least 20 more years, giving us the opportunity to answer additional questions, pursue new mysteries, and put together more pieces of the cosmic puzzle.
      For example: What were the very first stars like? Did stars form differently in the early universe? Do we even know how galaxies form? How do stars, dust, and supermassive black holes affect each other? What can merging galaxy clusters tell us about the nature of dark matter? How do collisions, bursts of stellar radiation, and migration of icy pebbles affect planet-forming disks? Can atmospheres survive on rocky worlds orbiting active red dwarf stars? Is Uranus’s moon Ariel an ocean world?
      As with any scientific endeavor, every answer raises more questions, and Webb has shown that its investigative power is unmatched. Demand for observing time on Webb is at an all-time high, greater than any other telescope in history, on the ground or in space. What new findings await?
      By Dr. Macarena Garcia Marin and Margaret W. Carruthers, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
      Media Contacts
      Laura Betz – laura.e.betz@nasa.gov
      NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
      Christine Pulliam – cpulliam@stsci.edu
      Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md.
      Related Information
      More Webb News
      More Webb Images
      Webb Science Themes
      Webb Mission Page
      Related For Kids
      What is the Webb Telescope?
      SpacePlace for Kids
      En Español
      Ciencia de la NASA
      NASA en español 
      Space Place para niños
      Keep Exploring Related Topics
      James Webb Space Telescope


      Webb is the premier observatory of the next decade, serving thousands of astronomers worldwide. It studies every phase in the…


      Galaxies



      Exoplanets



      Universe


      Share








      Details
      Last Updated Jul 02, 2025 Editor Marty McCoy Contact Laura Betz laura.e.betz@nasa.gov Related Terms
      James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Astrophysics Black Holes Brown Dwarfs Exoplanet Science Exoplanets Galaxies Galaxies, Stars, & Black Holes Goddard Space Flight Center Nebulae Science & Research Star-forming Nebulae Stars Studying Exoplanets The Universe View the full article
    • By NASA
      Dwayne Lavigne works as a controls engineer at NASA’s Stennis Space Center, where he supports NASA’s Artemis mission by programming specialized computers for engine testing.NASA/Danny Nowlin As a controls engineer at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, Dwayne Lavigne does not just fix problems – he helps put pieces together at America’s largest rocket propulsion test site.
      “There are a lot of interesting problems to solve, and they are never the same,” Lavigne said. “Sometimes, it is like solving a very cool puzzle and can be pretty satisfying.”
      Lavigne programs specialized computers called programmable logic controllers. They are extremely fast and reliable for automating precisely timed operations during rocket engine tests as NASA Stennis supports the agency’s Artemis missions to explore the Moon and build the foundation for the first crewed mission to Mars.
      However, the system will not act unless certain parameters are met in the proper sequence. It can be a complex relationship. Sometimes, 20 or 30 things must be in the correct configuration to perform an operation, such as making a valve open or close, or turning a motor on or off.
      The Picayune, Mississippi, native is responsible for establishing new signal paths between test hardware and the specialized computers.
      He also develops the human machine interface for the controls. The interface is a screen graphic that test engineers use to interact with hardware.
      Lavigne has worked with NASA for more than a decade. One of his proudest work moments came when he contributed to development of an automated test sequencing routine used during all RS-25 engine tests on the Fred Haise Test Stand.
      “We’ve had many successful tests over the years, and each one is a point of pride,” he said.
      When Lavigne works on the test stand, he works with the test hardware and interacts with technicians and engineers who perform different tasks than he does. It provides an appreciation for the group effort it takes to support NASA’s mission.
      “The group of people I work with are driven to get the job done and get it done right,” he said.
      In total, Lavigne has been part of the NASA Stennis federal city for 26 years. He initially worked as a contractor with the Naval Oceanographic Office as a data entry operator and with the Naval Research Laboratory as a software developer.
      September marks 55 years since NASA Stennis became a federal city. NASA, and more than 50 companies, organizations, and agencies located onsite share in operating costs, which allows tenants to direct more of their funding to individual missions. 
      “Stennis has a talented workforce accomplishing many different tasks,” said Lavigne. “The three agencies I’ve worked with at NASA Stennis are all very focused on doing the job correctly and professionally. In all three agencies, people realize that lives could be at risk if mistakes are made or shortcuts are taken.”
      Learn More About Careers at NASA Stennis Explore More
      6 min read A Defining Era: NASA Stennis and Space Shuttle Main Engine Testing
      Article 1 month ago 4 min read NASA Stennis Releases First Open-Source Software
      Article 2 months ago 5 min read NASA Stennis Software is Built for Future Growth
      Article 2 months ago View the full article
  • Check out these Videos

×
×
  • Create New...