Jump to content

Intelligent alien life may have repeatedly evolved billions of years ago and they might be visiting Earth and Mars

USH
 Share

Recommended Posts

USH Rising Star

USH

Posted
Posted
Below is an extract from a research paper written by a biology professor from the University of Oklahoma, a Smithsonian staff member, and a cosmology professor and it was recently published in Journal of Astrophysics and Aerospace Technology. 

skulls%20skeleton.jpg

Anatomically “modern” humans appeared on this planet less than 50,000 years ago. But intelligent extraterrestrial life may have repeatedly evolved billions of years ago that might be the technological and scientific accomplishments of “humans” and intelligent non-human “beings” that evolved on Earth-like planets billions of years before our solar system was formed? For thousands of years there have been reports of extraterrestrial beings and “sky boats” that have visited Earth as recounted in ancient texts from India, Egypt, and Greece. They might appear to us as “gods” and they might be visiting Earth and Mars. 

bone.jpg

The implications are that similar forms of life have evolved on other planets and that intelligent extraterrestrials have evolved on worlds billions of years older than our own. 

flying%20ufos%20orbs.jpg

We provide a sample of official NASA Mars photographs above and below of what appears to be wreckage and debris from extraterrestrial spacecraft, partially buried bones, the body of a humanoid, humanoid skulls and UAPs/UFOs photographed in the skies and above surface of Mars but it must be cautioned, however, that without direct and detailed examination, it is impossible to determine with absolute certainty if these “anomalies” are extraterrestrial in origin. 

ufo%20parts%201.jpg

So far, government agencies refuse to acknowledge any evidence for extraterrestrial life, be it UAPs or fungi on Mars and with the creation of the quasi-military National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) it became official policy to denounce, ridicule and suppress any and all reports of extraterrestrial life, including fossils of fungi and bacteria in meteors and all evidence of algae, lichens, fungi and biological activity on Mars. 

ufo%20parts%202.jpg

Why has the “Pentagon” and the quasi-military NASA gone to such extraordinary extremes to deny and suppress all evidence of extraterrestrial life? Possibly, they fear if they admit there is life on Mars and UAPs are extraterrestrial, the implications are that life must be pervasive throughout this galaxy and intelligent life evolved on innumerable worlds; and this would explain why there have been tens of thousands of reports of UFOs visiting this planet. Perhaps they fear if they were to admit and acknowledge the veracity of this vast body of evidence that religious and government authority would be undermined. 

Perhaps this explains why NASA and the U.S. Defense Dept. have engaged in what some members of the U.S. congress and a few media outlets have called a “coverup”. 

Read the in-depth report submitted on 7/30/23 and revised on 8/8, 11/23 including more photos at: file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/MarsHumanoidsUAPsFINAL.pdf

View the full article

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Topics

    • CosmicSignals
      Could Signals from Proxima Centauri b Indicate Advanced Life?
      By CosmicSignals
      I've been thinking a lot about the recent discussions around potential signals originating from Proxima Centauri b. With it being the closest known exoplanet in the habitable zone, it's intriguing to consider what kinds of signals we might actually be picking up and what they could mean for the existence of advanced life.
      The signals detected so far seem to have characteristics that set them apart from usual cosmic background noise. Some experts are cautiously optimistic, suggesting that these could be technosignatures, possibly from an intelligent civilization. However, others argue that we should be careful not to jump to conclusions without more concrete evidence.
      What if these signals are not just random cosmic events? Proxima Centauri b has features that suggest it could support liquid water, which is a crucial ingredient for life as we know it. If we assume that life exists there, the possibility of discovering their form of communication is exciting yet daunting.
      We’ve been using radio telescopes for decades to search for signs of life, but the idea of listening for technosignatures from our closest neighbor raises a lot of questions. Are we prepared to deal with the implications of making contact if it turns out that these signals are indeed artificial? Or would we simply classify them as noise due to an overzealous interpretation?
      As the data comes in, it seems vital to approach these findings with a mix of skepticism and curiosity. Could this be the initial spark of a long-awaited breakthrough in our understanding of extraterrestrial intelligence? It might be too early to say, but it’s certainly exciting to consider the potential avenues this could open up in our search for life beyond Earth.
      I’m curious about what others think about this. Are the signals we’re observing just coincidental, or do you think we might actually be on the cusp of discovering something significant? What are the next steps we should take in following up on these signals to ensure we’re not missing out on a potential first contact scenario?
    • MysteryFiles
      Could Recent Mars Rover Findings Point to Ancient Microbial Life?
      By MysteryFiles
      The recent images and data from the Mars rovers have stirred up some intriguing conversations about the possibility of ancient microbial life on the Red Planet. One detail that stood out to me was the discovery of specific sedimentary structures that look strikingly similar to microbial mats found in some of Earth's oldest geological formations. It's as if Mars is echoing our planet's distant past in a way that can't be easily dismissed.
      Thinking back to the findings from Curiosity and Perseverance, we know that these rovers have been meticulously analyzing the Martian soil and rock samples. The presence of certain organic compounds combined with these structural formations raises a lot of questions. Could these be the remnants of long-gone life forms, or are there alternative explanations we haven’t fully explored yet?
      I’ve also been considering the role of water in all this. Mars had a much wetter environment billions of years ago, which seems essential for any form of life as we know it. Some researchers are suggesting that the conditions may have been right for microbial life to thrive. It’s fascinating to think that we might be looking at signs of ancient life in environments that once bore rivers or lakes.
      Then there’s the skepticism angle. Some scientists argue that the structures we’re seeing could be purely chemical in nature and not biological at all. This makes sense, especially when we remember that Mars is full of surprises, and the line between abiotic and biotic processes can get blurry. How do we sift through the evidence without jumping to conclusions?
      What complicates things even further is the historical context. If we look back at how the scientific community reacted to the early discoveries of extremophiles on Earth, it was a game-changer for our understanding of what life can be. Maybe Mars has a similar story to tell, but it relies on us to decode its secrets appropriately.
      With all this in mind, I wonder how we should approach the next phase of exploration. Are there specific experiments or missions that you think should be prioritized to investigate these findings further? I really feel like we’re on the cusp of something significant, and it’s exciting to think about what the next round of data might reveal.
    • UAPResearcher
      Starship SN20's Lunar Capabilities: What We Might Be Missing
      By UAPResearcher
      Has anyone else been thinking about how Starship SN20 might change our approach to lunar landings? With its reusable design and impressive payload capacity, it seems like a giant leap forward compared to previous missions. But I can’t help but wonder about the complexities involved in actually landing it on the Moon.
      The Artemis program has laid out some ambitious goals, and if SN20 is used for these missions, we might see unprecedented capabilities. However, landing something that massive on the lunar surface raises a lot of engineering challenges. The lunar regolith is different from Earth’s terrain, and we’ve seen some setbacks with previous lunar landers.
      It also makes me curious about how SpaceX plans to integrate SN20 with the rest of the Artemis architecture. NASA’s requirements for precision in landing could be a real test for SpaceX’s systems. They’ve been successful with Falcon launches, but the Moon is a whole different ball game.
      I wonder if we’ll see some new innovations in landing technology specifically for SN20, especially considering the need for precision guidance systems. Will they develop something unique, or will they adapt existing technology?
      Also, what do we think about the timeline here? SpaceX has a reputation for pushing boundaries, but do we really think SN20 will be ready for the Artemis missions as planned? Or are we looking at more delays as they iron out the kinks?
      I’d love to hear from anyone who’s been following the technical updates closely. Are there any recent tests or developments that would shed light on how they’re preparing SN20 for lunar landings? It feels like there’s a lot at stake here, and I’m eager to see how it all unfolds.
    • UAPResearcher
      Challenges Facing the Mars 2026 Sample Return Mission
      By UAPResearcher
      With the Mars 2026 Sample Return Mission on the horizon, it’s hard not to think about the challenges that lie ahead. Considering the successes and failures of past missions, like the difficulties faced during the Mars Science Laboratory's Curiosity rover landing in 2012, the stakes feel even higher this time. The mission aims to bring back samples that could fundamentally change our understanding of Mars and the possibility of past life, yet we know that such ambitious goals are rarely straightforward.
      One key challenge is the logistics of retrieving and launching the samples from Mars’ surface. We’ve seen how complex the landing processes can be, particularly with the terrain and environmental conditions on Mars. The proposed ascent vehicle and the collection techniques need to be meticulously designed to ensure success. In 2021, the Perseverance rover demonstrated sample collection, but now we have to rely on technology that hasn't yet been tested in a return capacity.
      Another aspect to consider is the potential contamination of these samples. Planetary protection protocols are a serious concern, especially with the possibility of microbial life existing on Mars. What measures are in place to ensure that we don't mistakenly bring back something that could disrupt Earth's ecosystem? NASA has stringent guidelines, but there are always uncertainties. It’s essential we get this right, especially with the scrutiny that any findings will face.
      The timeline for the mission is also quite aggressive. Delays are always a risk in space missions, and given the intricacies of what Mars presents—like dust storms and radiation levels—any hiccup could push the timeline back. This makes me wonder how much flexibility is built into the mission design. Are there contingencies in place if something doesn’t go according to the plan?
      Lastly, the scientific community’s expectations are incredibly high. The samples could provide valuable insights into Mars' geology and potential habitability. Yet, with great expectations come greater risks of disappointment. The pressure could lead to hasty decisions during the mission that might jeopardize the integrity of the samples.
      It'll be fascinating to watch how these challenges unfold as we approach the launch date. Do you think the current technological capabilities are up to the task? What aspects of the mission do you think are most likely to encounter significant hurdles?
    • CosmicSignals
      Starship's Mars Mission: Any Updates on Progress?
      By CosmicSignals
      With the recent focus on Starship's continued testing, I'm curious about what the latest updates are regarding its potential Mars missions. It seems like we're at a pivotal moment with the technology maturing rapidly, but how close are we really to sending humans to Mars? The last few tests have shown significant advancements, especially with the heat shield and engine performance, but I haven't seen much chatter about the timeline for actual crewed missions.
      NASA's Artemis missions are also advancing quickly, which makes me wonder how that will intersect with SpaceX's plans. Are they still planning to support NASA with lunar missions before pushing further out to Mars? It feels like there’s a lot of synergy there, especially with the Lunar Gateway coming into play.
      What are everyone's thoughts on the potential challenges still facing Starship? Reusability is a game changer, but ensuring that it can handle the long duration and harsh conditions of a Mars mission is another beast entirely. Plus, there’s the question of life support systems and how they’ll be integrated into the design.
      I also recall some excitement around the idea of in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) for producing fuel on Mars. Has there been any word on how SpaceX plans to approach that? If they could figure out a reliable way to produce methane on Mars, that would dramatically change the game for long-term colonization efforts.
      I'd love to hear if anyone has caught any recent leaks or statements from SpaceX that give insight into their roadmap. The anticipation for the first human mission to Mars is palpable, and it feels like we're on the brink of some exciting breakthroughs in the next couple of years. Are we still aiming for the mid-2030s?
      It's hard to keep up with everything that's happening, so any detailed updates or insider information would be appreciated! Maybe we can even speculate a bit on what the first crew on Mars might experience, considering how much we’ve learned from previous missions with rovers and landers.
×
×
  • Create New...